Skip to main content
Log in

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: a useful additional sequence in paediatric imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Whole-body MR (WBMR) imaging allows the acquisition of images of the entire body in a matter of minutes. Its use has primarily been in the evaluation of possible metastases in the setting of a known primary tumour. Objective: To document the value of WBMR imaging in ten children in whom this was added as an additional sequence when the primary diagnosis had not yet been made. Materials and methods: Ten children, age range 4 months–15 years (mean 7 years 4 months) had WBMR imaging after initial MR showed an abnormality that raised the possibility of systemic disease. Initial scanning was of the brain (n=1), spine (n=2), retroperitoneum (n=4), hips (n=1), femur (n=1) and wrist (n=1). Results: Abnormalities were detected in eight patients. Two patients had acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and another had an anaplastic lymphoma, unsuspected prior to the WBMR. Two patients had a previously undiagnosed neuroblastoma with bone marrow metastases. Two patients had Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis. Another had multiple bone lesions due to cystic angiomatosis. Conclusions: WBMR imaging may be a useful additional sequence in children in whom a systemic and especially a bone marrow abnormality is suspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–e
Fig. 2a, b
Fig. 3a, b
Fig. 4a, b
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eustace SJ, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, et al (1997) A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. AJR 169:1655–1661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daldrup-Link H, Franzius C, Link T, et al (2001) whole-body imaging for the detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. AJR 177:229–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazumdar A, Siegel MJ, Narra V et al (2002) Whole body fast inversion recovery MR imaging of small cell neoplasms in paediatric patients: a pilot study. AJR 179:1261–1266

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walker R, Kessar P, Blanchard R, et al (2000) Turbo STIR magnetic resonance imaging as a whole-body screening tool for metastases in patients with breast carcinoma: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:343–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horvath LJ, Burtness BA, McCarthy S, et al (1999) Total-body echo-planar MR imaging in the staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional methods—early experience. Radiology 211:119–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Traill ZC, Talbot D, Golding S, et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging versus radionuclide scintigraphy in screening for bone metastases. Clin Radiol 54:448–451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eustace SJ, Walker R, Blake M, et al (1999) Whole body MR imaging. Practical issues, clinical applications and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:209–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Downey SE, Wilson M, Boggis C, et al (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone metastases: a diagnostic and screening technique. Br J Surg 84:1094–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank JA, Ling A, Patronas NJ (1990) Detection of malignant bone tumours: MR imaging versus scintigraphy. AJR 155:1043–1048

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Avrahami E, Tadmor R, Dally O, et al (1989) Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:598–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gosfield E, Alavi A, Kneeland B (1993) Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting spinal metastases. J Nucl Med 34:2191–2198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher BD (1997) Imaging bone sarcomas. Radiol Clin North Am 35:1477–1494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lauenstein TC, Freudenberg LS, Goehde SC, et al (2002) Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 12:2091–2099

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson KM, Leavitt GD, Kayser HW (1997) Total-body MR imaging in as little as 18 seconds. Radiology 202:262–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barkhausen J, Quick HH, Lauenstein T, et al (2001) Whole-body MR imaging in 30 seconds with real-time true FISP and a rolling table platform: feasibility study. Radiology 220:252–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connell MJ, Hargaden G, Powell T, et al (2002) Whole-body turbo short tau inversion recovery MR imaging using a moving tabletop. AJR 179:866–868

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hargaden G, O’Connell M, Kavanagh E, et al (2003) Current concepts in whole-body imaging using turbo short tau inversion recovery MR imaging. AJR 180:247–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kavanagh E, Smith C, Eustace S (2003) Whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging: controversies and avenues for development. Eur Radiol 13:2196–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinborn M, Heuck A, Tiling R, et al (1999) Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:123–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin W, Delbeke W, Patton J et al (1996) Detection of malignancies with SPECT versus PET, with 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 198:225–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olson P, Everson L, Griffith H (1994) Staging of musculoskeletal tumours. Radiol Clin North Am 32:151–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow in hematologic malignancies. Blood 90:2127–2147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Siegel M, Ishwaran H, Fletcher B, et al (2002) Staging of neuroblastoma at imaging: report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 223:168–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. States LJ (2001) Imaging of metabolic bone disease and marrow disorders in children. Radiol Clin North Am 39:749–772

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Algra P, Bloem J, Tissing H, et al (1991) Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics 11:219–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Onikul E, Fletcher B, Parham DM, et al (1996) Accuracy of MR imaging for estimating intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma. AJR 167:1211–1215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie P. Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laffan, E.E., O’Connor, R., Ryan, S.P. et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: a useful additional sequence in paediatric imaging. Pediatr Radiol 34, 472–480 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1184-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1184-x

Keywords

Navigation