Skip to main content
Log in

Blind and ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous biopsy of the liver is the most commonly used procedure to obtain tissue for histopathological assessment of liver disease. Although, intuitively, image-guided liver biopsy might be expected to reduce the risk of bleeding, haematoma caused by a penetrating injury of a branch of the hepatic artery or portal vein, and puncture of the gallbladder, no trial has been large enough to show reduced mortality or morbidity with US guidance, and the mechanisms by which the use of US can reduce the risk of bleeding remain speculative.

Objective

To compare the mortality and morbidity of blind liver biopsy with that of US-guided liver biopsy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of our experience of 140 procedures over a 16-month period.

Results

In the blind group, biopsy was unsuccessful in ten children (95% CL 7.3–25.4); no tissue was obtained in eight children and an inadequate sample was obtained in two. Three children (95% CL 9.2–14.7) suffered significant haemorrhage (indicated by a drop in haemoglobin of >20 g/l) with intrahepatic (n=1) and subcapsular (n=2) haematomas detectable by US after biopsy. An adequate sample was obtained in all children in the US-guided group. There were no complications requiring treatment in either group.

Conclusions

Our results showed a significant difference in the complication rate between liver biopsy undertaken with US guidance and liver biopsy performed blind (P=0.002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glaser J, Pausch J (1995) The risk of liver biopsy (in German). Z Gastroenterol 33:673–676

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherlock S, Dooley J (1997) Diseases of the liver and biliary system, 10th edn. Blackwell, London

  3. Balistreri WF (1985) Neonatal cholestasis. J Pediatr 106:171–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Degos F, Benhamou JP (1999) Liver biopsy. In: Bircher J, Benhamou JP, McIntyre N, et al (eds) Clinical hepatology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 541–548

  5. Bingel A (1923) Ueber die parenchympunktion der leber. Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med 35:210–212

    Google Scholar 

  6. Menghini G (1958) One second needle biopsy of the liver. Gastroenterology 35:109

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindor KD, Bru C, Jorgenson, et al (1996) The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology 23:1079–1083

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodd GD, Esola CC, Memel DS, et al (1996) Sonography: the undiscovered jewel of interventional radiology. Radiographics 16:1271–1288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffer FA (2000) Liver biopsy methods for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Radiol 30:481–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma P, MacDonald GB, Banaji M (1982) The risk of bleeding after percutaneous liver biopsy: relation to platelet count. J Clin Gastroenterol 4:451–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheimann AO, Barrios JM, Al-Tawil YS, et al (2000) Percutaneous liver biopsy in children: impact of ultrasonography and spring-loaded biopsy needle. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 31:536–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lichtman S, Guzman C, Moore D, et al (1987) Morbidity after percutaneous liver biopsy. Arch Dis Child 62:901–904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lebensztejn DM, Kaczmarski M, Sobaniec-Lotowska M, et al (2000) Blind liver biopsy in children—diagnostic significance and complications in authors' own material. Med Sci Monit 6:1155–1158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ (1978) Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology 74:103–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cadranel J-F, Rufat P, Degos F (2000) Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. Hepatology 32:477–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stotland BR, Lichtenstein GR (1996) Liver biopsy complications and routine ultrasound. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1295–1296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugano S, Sumino Y, Hatory T, et al (1991) Incidence of ultrasound-detected intrahepatic haematomas due to Trucut needle liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci 36:1229–1233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiff ER, Schiff L (1993) Needle biopsy of the liver. In: Schiff L, Schiff ER (eds) Diseases of the liver, vol 1, 7th edn. Lippincott, New York, pp 217–218

  19. Younnossi ZM, Theran JC, Ganiats TG, et al (1998) Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease: an economic analysis. Dig Dis Sci 43:46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerio Nobili.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nobili, V., Comparcola, D., Sartorelli, M.R. et al. Blind and ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Pediatr Radiol 33, 772–775 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-003-1044-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-003-1044-0

Keywords

Navigation