Skip to main content
Log in

Potential pitfalls in cranial sonography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. We present several anatomic variants of the brain and artifacts related to scanning techniques which could be misinterpreted as lesions on neonatal cranial sonography.

Materials and methods. The findings were derived from US studies performed on 176 premature infants and 26 full-term newborns, using the anterior, posterior and mastoid fontanelles as acoustic windows.

Results. The pseudolesions are divided into three groups: ventricular system (asymmetric lateral ventricle size and coarctation of the lateral ventricles); choroid plexus ("split" choroid, "truncated" choroid and choroid cyst); and brain parenchyma (peritrigonal blush, thalamic pseudolesion, pseudo-absence of the inferior vermis, occipital pseudomass and calcar avis simulating intraventricular clot). We provide images of these pseudolesions and clues to their differentiation from true brain pathology. Images of several brain disorders are included for comparison. Knowledge of these potential pitfalls is essential for proper interpretation of US brain studies and will help to avoid the use of other more invasive diagnostic tests.

Conclusions. Misleading images seen on US examination of the neonatal brain that could be misinterpreted as pathology are presented, with clues to their differentiation from true lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enríquez, G., Correa, F., Lucaya, J. et al. Potential pitfalls in cranial sonography. Ped Radiol 33, 110–117 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0836-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0836-y

Navigation