Aquatic Toxicity of Chemical Road Dust Suppressants to Freshwater Organisms

Abstract

Unpaved roads make up at least 14 million kilometers of the worldwide road network. Although investigations of road runoff often are focused on paved roads, unpaved roads contribute large volumes of runoff to roadside aquatic habitats and introduce unique constituents to runoff, such as chemical dust suppressants. At least 200 products across five chemical categories are commercially available for road dust suppression and are typically applied at rates up to 4.5 L/m2. Many of these products are poorly described and are lacking basic information on environmental transport, fate, and potential toxicity to roadside organisms. We characterized the aquatic toxicity of 27 commercially available dust control products, including 13 biobased products from the U.S. Department of Agriculture BioPreferred catalog, using juvenile rainbow trout. Acute toxicity varied by more than 1000-fold among products, with 96-h LC50 values ranging from 1.7 to > 16,000 mg/L. Toxicity was not well-predicted by product category. Testing with selected products after simulated weathering under UV radiation did not provide evidence of photoenhanced toxicity. Additional tests with freshwater mussels, juvenile crayfish, pond snails, and amphibian larvae indicated that juvenile rainbow trout were reasonable surrogates for these organisms for a subset of products. This effort represents one of the first comparative studies of dust suppressant toxicity and provides important information for assessing risk to aquatic resources from a widely used but understudied class of contaminants in road runoff.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Addo JQ, Chenard M, Sanders TG (2004) Road dust suppression: Effect on maintenance, stability, safety and the environment (Phases 1–3). Report MPC-04-156. Mountain Plains Consortium

  2. ASTM International (2019a) Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests with fishes, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians (E729-96 (2014)). Annual Book of ASTM International Standards Volume 11.06, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  3. ASTM International (2019b) Standard guide for conducting laboratory toxicity tests with freshwater mussels (ASTM E2455-06 (2013)). Annual Book of ASTM Standards Volume 11.06. West Conshohocken, PA

  4. Burden N, Benstead R, Clook M, Doyle I, Edwards P, Maynard SK, Ryder K, Sheahan D, Whale G, van Egmond R, Wheeler JR, Hutchinson TH (2016) Advancing the 3Rs in regulatory ecotoxicology: a pragmatic cross-sector approach. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:417–421

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calfee RD, Little EE (2003) The effects of ultraviolet-b radiation on the toxicity of fire-fighting chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1525–1531

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE (eds) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Water Environment Federation, American Water Works Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edvardsson K, Gustafsson A, Magnusson R (2012) Dust suppressants efficiency study: in situ measurements of dust generation on gravel roads. Int J Pavement Eng 13:11–31

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Environment Canada (2014) 2013 Air pollutant emissions for Alberta. Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Search, National Pollutant Release Inventory. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://www.ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/donnees-data/ap/index.cfm?do=ap_result&process=true&sector=&lang=en&year=2013&substance=all&location=AB&submit=Submit

  9. Erickson RJ (2015) Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program (TRAP), Ver 1.30a. EPA/600/C-11/002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  10. Ettinger WS (1987) Impacts of a chemical dust suppressant/soil stabilizer on the physical and biological characteristics of a stream. J Soil Water Conserv 42:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gillis PL (2011) Assessing the toxicity of sodium chloride to the glochidia of freshwater mussels: implications for salinization of surface waters. Environ Pollut 159:1702–1708

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodrich BA, Koski RD, Jacobi WR (2009) Monitoring surface water chemistry near magnesium chloride dust suppressant treated roads in Colorado. J Environ Qual 38:2373–2381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greening T (2011) Quantifying the impacts of vehicle-generated dust: a comprehensive approach. Transport Research Support Program. World Bank, Washington, DC, p 84

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hermann PM, Bulloch AGM (1998) Developmental plasticity of respiratory behavior in Lymnaea. Behav Neurosci 112:656–667

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Irwin K, Hall F, Kemner W, Beighley E, Husby P (2008) Testing of dust suppressants for water quality impacts. Final Report [not numbered]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati, OH

  17. Jones D (2013) Project report on the development of a selection guide and specifications for unpaved road chemical treatments. Report UCPRC-RR-2013-02. University of California Pavement Research Center, Davis and Berkeley, CA

  18. Kavouras IG, DuBois DW, Nikolich G, Avittia AC, Etyemezian V (2016) Particulate dust emission factors from unpaved roads in the US–Mexico border semi-arid region. J Arid Environ 124:189–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan S, Nugegoda D (2007) Sensitivity of juvenile freshwater crayfish Cherax destructor (Decapoda: Parastacidae) to trace metals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 68:463–469

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kociolek A (2013) Unpaved Road Chemical Treatments State of the Practice Survey. FHWA-CFL/TD-13-002. Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhns H, Gillies J, Etyemezian V, Nikolich G, King J, Zhu D, Uppapalli S, Engelbrecht J, Kohl S (2010) Effect of soil type and momentum on unpaved road particulate matter emissions from wheeled and tracked vehicles. Aerosol Sci Technol 44:187–196

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kunz BK, Little EE (2015) Dust control products at Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge, Texas: environmental safety and performance. Transp Res Rec 2472:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Larson RA, Berenbaum MR (1988) Environmental phototoxicity. Environ Sci Technol 22:354–360

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leite MBNL, De Araujo MMS, Nascimento IA, Da Cruz ACS, Pereira SA, Do Nascimento NC (2011) Toxicity of water-soluble fractions of biodiesel fuels derived from castor oil, palm oil, and waste cooking oil. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:893–897

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lippiatt BC (2013) Science-based metrics for product sustainability assessment. In: Jawahir IS et al (eds) Treatise on sustainability science and engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 127–138

    Google Scholar 

  26. Little EE, Fabacher DL (1996) Exposure of freshwater fish to simulated solar UVB radiation. In: Ostrander GK (ed) Techniques in aquatic toxicology. CRC Press Inc, New York, pp 141–158

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mayer FL, Ellersieck MR, Krause GF, Sun K, Lee G, Buckler DR (2002) Time-concentration-effect models in predicting chronic toxicity from acute toxicity data. In: Crane M, Newman MC, Chapman PF, Fenlon J (eds) Risk assessment with time to event models. Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL, pp 39–67

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meijer JR, Huijbregts MAJ, Schotten KCGJ, Schipper AM (2018) Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environ Res Lett 13:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabd42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Monlux S, Mitchell M (2006) Surface-aggregate stabilization with chloride materials. 0677 1805—SDTDC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Technology and Development Program

  30. Partearroyo MA, Pilling SJ, Jones MN (1991) The lysis of isolated fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gill epithelial cells by surfactants. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C: Comp Pharmacol 100:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Piechota TC, vanEe J, Batista JR, Stave KA, James DE (2004) Potential environmental impacts of dust suppressants: “Avoiding another Times Beach.” EPA/600/R-04/031. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in conjunction with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV

  32. Prosser RS, Rochfort Q, McInnis R, Exall K, Gillis PL (2017) Assessing the toxicity and risk of salt-impacted winter road runoff to the early life stages of freshwater mussels in the Canadian province of Ontario. Environ Pollut 230:589–597

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of human experimental technique. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Singer MM, Aurand D, Bragin GE, Clark JR, Coelho GM, Sowby ML, Tjeerdeema RS (2000) Standardization of the preparation and quantitation of water-accommodated fractions of petroleum for toxicity testing. Mar Poll Bull 40:1007–1016

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh V, Piechota T, James D (2003) Hydrologic impacts of disturbed lands treated with dust suppressants. J Hydrol Eng 8:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Steevens J, Suedel B, Gibson A, Kennedy A, Blackburn W, Splichal D, Pierce JT (2007) Environmental evaluation of dust stabilizer products. Report ERDC/EL TR-07-X. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center

  37. Sun K, Krause GF, Mayer FL, Ellersieck MR, Basu AP (1995) Estimation of acute toxicity by fitting a dose-time-response surface. Risk Anal 15:247–252

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. US Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th edn. EPA-821-R-02-012. Office of Water, Washington, DC

  39. US Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Technical overview of ecological risk assessment—analysis phase: ecological effects characterization. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/technical-overview-ecological-risk-assessment-0. Accessed 5 May 2020

  40. Vaughn CC (2018) Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 810:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang N, Ingersoll CG, Greer IE, Hardesty DK, Ivey CD, Kunz JL, Brumbaugh WG, Dwyer FJ, Roberts AD, Augspurger T, Kane CM, Neves RJ, Barnhart MC (2007) Chronic toxicity of copper and ammonia to juvenile freshwater mussels (Unionidae). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2048–2056

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang N, Ivey CD, Dorman RA, Ingersoll CG, Steevens J, Hammer EJ, Bauer CR, Mount DR (2018) Acute toxicity of sodium chloride and potassium chloride to a unionid mussel (Lampsilis siliquoidea) in water exposures. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:3041–3049

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiss M, Haufe J, Carus M, Brandão M, Bringezu S, Hermann B, Patel MK (2012) A review of the environmental impacts of biobased materials. J Ind Ecol 16:S169–S181

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wheeler MW, Park RM, Bailer AJ (2006) Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1441–1444

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wigginton AJ, Birge WJ (2007) Toxicity of cadmium to six species in two genera of crayfish and the effect of cadmium on molting success. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:548–554

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to E. Scott, H. Puglis, J. Davis, N. Fischer, J. Counihan, L. Johnson, S. Olson, and R. Espejo for laboratory assistance; to R. Surdahl, D. Jones, P. Bolander, L. Fay, and D. James for technical guidance; and to S. Suder, S. Furniss, and S. Finger for overall project support. The work benefitted from the comments of C. Ingersoll, J. Zajicek, C. Schmitt, J. Steevens, and two anonymous reviewers.

Funding

Funding to support this work was provided by the U.S. Federal Lands Highway Refuge Roads Program through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Federal Lands Highway Coordinated Technology Implementation Program (CTIP) through the U.S. Forest Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey Environmental Health Program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to portions of the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Bethany K. Kunz and Edward E. Little. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Bethany K. Kunz, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bethany K. Kunz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics Approval

All animal testing protocols were approved by the USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center (CERC) Animal Care and Use Committee.

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated during the current study are available in the USGS ScienceBase repository, (https://doi.org/10.5066/P9VK2LLO).

Disclaimer

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the US Government.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunz, B.K., Little, E.E. & Barandino, V.L. Aquatic Toxicity of Chemical Road Dust Suppressants to Freshwater Organisms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00806-y

Download citation