Abstract
Proteins approximately behave as molecular clocks, accumulating amino acid replacements at a more or less constant rate. Nonetheless, each protein displays a characteristic rate of evolution: whereas some proteins remain largely unaltered over large periods of time, others can rapidly accumulate amino acid replacements. An article by Richard Dickerson, published in the first issue of the Journal of Molecular Evolution (J Mol Evol 1:26–45, 1971), described the first analysis in which the rates of evolution of many proteins were compared, and the differences were interpreted in the light of their function. When comparing the sequences of fibrinopeptides, hemoglobin, and cytochrome c of different species, he observed a linear relationship between the number of amino acid replacements and divergence time. Remarkably, fibrinopeptides had evolved fast, cytochrome c had evolved slowly, and hemoglobin exhibited an intermediate rate of evolution. As the Journal of Molecular Evolution celebrates its 50th anniversary, I highlight this landmark article and reflect on its impact on the field of Molecular Evolution.
References
Alvarez-Ponce D (2012) The relationship between the hierarchical position of proteins in the human signal transduction network and their rate of evolution. BMC Evol Biiol 12(1):192
Alvarez-Ponce D (2014) Why proteins evolve at different rates: the determinants of proteins’ rates of evolution. In: Fares M (ed) Natural selection: methods and applications. CRC Press, London, pp 126–178
Alvarez-Ponce D, Sabater-Muñoz B, Toft C, Ruiz-González MX, Fares MA (2016) Essentiality is a strong determinant of protein rates of evolution during mutation accumulation experiments in Escherichia coli. Genome Biol Evol 8(9):2914–2927
Alvarez-Ponce D, Feyertag F, Chakraborty S (2017) Position matters: network centrality considerably impacts rates of protein evolution in the human protein–protein interaction network. Genome Biol Evol 9(6):1742–1756
Alvarez-Ponce D, Aguilar-Rodríguez J, Fares MA (2019) Molecular chaperones accelerate the evolution of their protein clients in yeast. Genome Biol Evol 11(8):2360–2375
Baum DA, Futuyma DJ, Hoekstra HE et al (2013) The Princeton guide to evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Biswas S, Akey JM (2006) Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends Genet 22(8):437–446
Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO (2006a) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 23:1751–1761
Bloom JD, Labthavikul ST, Otey CR, Arnold FH (2006b) Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:5869–5874
Bogumil D, Dagan T (2012) Cumulative impact of chaperone-mediated folding on genome evolution. Biochemistry 51:9941–9953
Brown CJ, Takayama S, Campen AM, Vise P, Marshall TW, Oldfield CJ, Williams CJ, Dunker AK (2002) Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. J Mol Evol 55:104–110
Dickerson RE (1971) The structure of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol 1:26–45
Dickerson RE, Geis I (1969) The structure and action of proteins. Harper & Row, New York
Dickerson RE, Takano T, Eisenberg D, Kallai OB, Samson L, Cooper A, Margoliash E (1971) Ferricytochrome c: I. general features of the horse and bonito proteins at 2.8 Å resolution. J Biol Chem 246(5):1511–1535
Dickerson RE, Takano T, Kallai OB, Samson L (1972) Ferricytochrome c: II. Chain flexibility and a possible reduction mechanism. In: Åkeson Å, Ehrenberg A (eds) Structure and function of oxidation–reduction enzymes. Pergamon, Stockholm, pp 69–83
Doolittle RF, Blombäck B (1964) Amino-acid sequence investigations of fibrinopeptides from various mammals: evolutionary implications. Nature 202(4928):147–152
Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH (2005) Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:14338–14343
Duret L, Mouchiroud D (2000) Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol 17:68–74
Feyertag F, Alvarez-Ponce D (2017) Disulfide bonds enable accelerated protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 34(8):1833–1837
Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296:750–752
Goldman N, Thorne JL, Jones DT (1998) Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149:445–458
Greenberg AJ, Stockwell SR, Clark AG (2008) Evolutionary constraint and adaptation in the metabolic network of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 25:2537–2546
Hamilton MB (2009) Population genetics. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Hurst LD, Smith NG (1999) Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr Biol 9:747–750
Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2004) Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase. BMC Evol Biol 4:22
Julenius K, Pedersen AG (2006) Protein evolution is faster outside the cell. Mol Biol Evol 23:2039–2048
Kim PM, Lu LJ, Xia Y, Gerstein MB (2006) Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 314(5807):1938–1941
Kumar S (2005) Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 6(8):654–662
Levy ED, De S, Teichmann SA (2012) Cellular crowding imposes global constraints on the chemistry and evolution of proteomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:20461–20466
Margoliash E (1963) Primary structure and evolution of cytochrome c. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 50:672–679
Morgan GJ (1998) Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the molecular evolutionary clock, 1959-1965. J Hist Biol 1:155–178
Nolan C, Margoliash E (1968) Comparative aspects of primary structures of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 37(1):727–791
Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD (2001) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927–931
Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ (2006) An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 7:337–348
Park C, Chen X, Yang JR, Zhang J (2013) Differential requirements for mRNA folding partially explain why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E678–E686
Pegueroles C, Laurie S, Albà MM (2013) Accelerated evolution after gene duplication: a time-dependent process affecting just one copy. Mol Biol Evol 30(8):1830–1842
Pevsner J (2009) Bioinformatics and functional genomics. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken
Robinson LM, Boland JR, Braverman JM (2016) Revisiting a classic study of the molecular clock. J Mol Evol 82(2–3):110–116
Ruse M, Travis J (2009) Evolution: the first four billion years. Belknap, Cambridge
Russell PJ (2003) Essential iGenetics. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco
Toft C, Fares MA (2010) Structural calibration of the rates of amino acid evolution in a search for Darwin in drifting biological systems. Mol Biol Evol 27:2375–2385
van der Lee R, Wiel L, van Dam T, Huynen MA (2017) Genome-scale detection of positive selection in nine primates predicts human-virus evolutionary conflicts. Nucleic Acids Res 45(18):10634–10648
Yang JR, Liao BY, Zhuang SM, Zhang J (2012) Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E831–E840
Zhang J, Yang JR (2015) Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution. Nat Rev Genet 16:409–420
Zuckerkandl E, Pauling LB (1962) Molecular disease, evolution, and genetic heterogeneity. In: Kasha M, Pullman B (eds) Horizons in biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 189–225
Zuckerkandl E, Pauling LB (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Evol Genes Proteins 97:166
Acknowledgements
Research in my lab is supported by grant MCB 1818288 from the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: Aaron Goldman
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarez-Ponce, D. Richard Dickerson, Molecular Clocks, and Rates of Protein Evolution. J Mol Evol 89, 122–126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-020-09973-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-020-09973-x