Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 217–222 | Cite as

Flap repair of complex pilonidal sinus: a single institution experience

  • George Kokosis
  • Andrew Barbas
  • Cecilia Ong
  • Howard Levinson
  • Detlev Erdmann
  • Christopher R. Mantyh
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Healing of pilonidal cysts after initial excision remains a vexing problem for surgeons. While simple sinus can be managed with success, recurrence of the cyst after primary excision or sizeable sinus often requires a more complex repair; however, the morbidity and ultimate success of these procedures are unknown.

Methods

A retrospective review from 2009 to 2014 of all consecutive patients undergoing surgical intervention for pilonidal cyst disease from a single institution was performed. Management of pilonidal disease after excision with flap coverage was examined. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, procedural data, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-one flap patients were identified. These included 15 V-Y fasciocutaneous repairs, 5 rotational flaps, and 1 Romberg flap closure. Mean BMI was 32, mean defect size was 8 cm, and the patients have had an average of 1.05 attempts prior to the excision and flap repair. The flap group demonstrated 14% recurrence rate, 33% reoperation rate, and 47% dehiscence rate. Mean time to healing was 36.4 days.

Conclusions

Flap repairs for complex pilonidal cysts have high rates of recurrence, reoperation, and wound dehiscence. However, flap patients represent a more challenging repair with long operative times, blood loss, and large sinus size. Absence of the perfect approach to managing a complex sinus necessitates a thorough description of the problem and a discussion between the surgeon and the patient about the merits of each approach before a decision is made.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Keywords

Pilonidal sinus Cyst Flap 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

George Kokosis, Andrew Barbas, Cecilia Ong, Howard Levinson, Detlev Erdmann, and Christopher R. Mantyh declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study is a retrospective study and was conducted after an Institutional Review Board was conducted.

Informed consent

No informed consent was necessary since this was a retrospective study.

References

  1. 1.
    Saray A, Dirlik M, Caglikulekci M et al (2002) Gluteal V-Y advancement fasciocutaneous flap for treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 36:80–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sungur N, Kocer U, Uysal A et al (2006) V-Y rotation advancement fasciocutaneous flap for excisional defects of pilonidal sinus. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2448–2454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aydede H, Erhan Y, Sakarya A et al (2001) Comparison of three methods in surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. ANZ J Surg 71:362–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sahasrabudhe P, Panse N, Waghmare C et al (2012) V-y advancement flap technique in resurfacing postexcisional defect in cases with pilonidal sinus disease-study of 25 cases. Indian J Surg 74:364–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khanna A, Rombeau JL (2011) Pilonidal disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:46–53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kitchen PR (1982) Pilonidal sinus: excision and primary closure with a lateralised wound—the Karydakis operation. Aust N Z J Surg 52:302–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allen-Mersh TG (1990) Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. Br J Surg 77:123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson HA (1978) On treatment of pilonidal sinus and cysts by conservative excision and W-plasty closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 62:107–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borman H, Maral T (2002) The gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation-advancement flap with V-Y closure in the management of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2325–2329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berkem H, Topaloglu S, Ozel H et al (2005) V-Y advancement flap closures for complicated pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Color Dis 20:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khatri VP, Espinosa MH, Amin AK (1994) Management of recurrent pilonidal sinus by simple V-Y fasciocutaneous flap. Dis Colon rectum 37:1232–1235Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demiryilmaz I, Yilmaz I, Peker K et al (2014) Application of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap in primary and recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Med Sci Monit 20:1263–1266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Caliskan K et al (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V-Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 199:170–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kronborg O, Christensen K, Zimmermann-Nielsen C (1985) Chronic pilonidal disease: a randomized trial with a complete 3-year follow-up. Br J Surg 72:303–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solla JA, Rothenberger DA (1990) Chronic pilonidal disease. An assessment of 150 cases. Dis Colon rectum 33:758–761Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weinstein MA, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP (1977) The dilemma of pilonidal disease: pilonidal cystotomy, reappraisal of an old technique. Dis Colon rectum 20:287–289Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O et al (2010) Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 200:318–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Middleton MD (1968) Treatment of pilonidal sinus by Z-plasty. Br J Surg 55:516–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bose B, Candy J (1970) Radical cure of pilonidal sinus by Z-plasty. Am J Surg 120:783–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roth RF, Moorman WL (1977) Treatment of pilonidal sinus and cyst by conservative excision and W-plasty closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:412–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee HC, Ho YH, Seow CF et al (2000) Pilonidal disease in Singapore: clinical features and management. Aust N Z J Surg 70:196–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaser SA, Zengaffinen R, Uhlmann M et al (2015) Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study. Int J Color Dis 30:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eryilmaz R, Okan I, Coskun A et al (2009) Surgical treatment of complicated pilonidal sinus with a fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. Dis Colon rectum 52:2036–2040Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dylek ON, Bekereciodlu M (1998) Role of simple V-Y advancement flap in the treatment of complicated pilonidal sinus. Eur J Surg 164:961–964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milone M, Musella M, Salvatore G et al (2011) Effectiveness of a drain in surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial on 803 consecutive patients. Int J Color Dis 26:1601–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations