Advertisement

Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 1531–1543 | Cite as

Experimental characterization of gasoline sprays under highly evaporating conditions

  • Muhammad Mahabat Khan
  • Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh
  • Azfar Khalid
  • Waqas Akbar Lughmani
Original
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

An experimental investigation of multistream gasoline sprays under highly evaporating conditions is carried out in this paper. Temperature increase of fuel and low engine pressure could lead to flash boiling. The spray shape is normally modified significantly under flash boiling conditions. The spray plumes expansion along with reduction in the axial momentum causes the jets to merge and creates a low-pressure area below the injector’s nozzle. These effects initiate the collapse of spray cone and lead to the formation of a single jet plume or a big cluster like structure. The collapsing sprays reduces exposed surface and therefore they last longer and subsequently penetrate more. Spray plume momentum increase, jet plume reduction and spray target widening could delay or prevent the closure condition and limit the penetration (delayed formation of the cluster promotes evaporation). These spray characteristics are investigated experimentally using shadowgraphy, for five and six hole injectors, under various boundary conditions. Six hole injectors produce more collapsing sprays in comparison to five hole injector due to enhanced jet to jet interactions. The spray collapse tendency reduces with increase in injection pressure due high axial momentum of spray plumes. The spray evaporation rates of five hole injector are observed to be higher than six hole injectors. Larger spray cone angles of the six hole injectors promote less penetrating and less collapsing sprays.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement of conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alkidas AC, El Tahry SH (2003) Contributors to the fuel economy advantage of DISI engines over PFI engines. SAE Tech Pap Ser. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-3101
  2. 2.
    Piock WF, Befrui B, Berndorfer A, Hoffmann G (2015) Fuel pressure and charge motion effects on GDi engine particulate emissions. SAE Int J Engines 8:464–473.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee S, Park S (2014) Spray atomization characteristics of a GDI injector equipped with a group-hole nozzle. Fuel 137:50–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wigley G, Goodwin M, Pitcher G, Blondel D (2004) Imaging and PDA analysis of a GDI spray in the near-nozzle region. Exp Fluids 36:565–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0690-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi D-S, Choi G-M, Kim D-J (2002) Spray structures and vaporizing characteristics of a GDI fuel spray. KSME Int J 16:999–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02949729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan M (2014) RANS and LES of multi-hole sprays for the mixture formation in piston engines. Doctoral Dissertation, Ecole Centrale de LyonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montanaro A, Allocca L (2015) Flash boiling evidences of a multi-hole GDI spray under engine conditions by Mie-scattering measurements. SAE Tech Pap Ser. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1945
  8. 8.
    Khan MM, Hélie J, Gorokhovski M, Sheikh NA (2017) Experimental and numerical study of flash boiling in gasoline direct injection sprays. Appl Therm Eng 123:377–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khan MM, Sheikh NA (2016) Identification and characterization of coherent structures in gasoline injector nozzle flow using proper orthogonal decomposition. J Mech Sci Technol 30:3673–3680.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0729-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vairamuthu G, Sundarapandian S, Thangagiri B (2015) Use of calophyllum inophyllum biofuel blended with diesel in DI diesel engine modified with nozzle holes and its size. Heat Mass Transf 52:1005–1013.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1623-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan M, Hélie J, Gorokhovski M, Sheikh NA (2017) Air entrainment in high pressure multihole gasoline direct injection sprays. J Appl Fluid Mech 10:1223–1234.  https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jafm.73.241.27628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Negro S, Brusiani F, Bianchi GM (2011) A numerical model for flash boiling of gasoline-ethanol blends in fuel injector nozzles. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 4:237–256.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-24-0003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeng Y, Lee C (2000) Modeling of spray vaporization and air-fuel mixing in gasoline direct-injection engines. SAE Tech Pap Ser. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-0537
  14. 14.
    Bar-Kohany T, Levy M (2016) State of the art review of flash-boiling atomization. At Sprays 26:1259–1305.  https://doi.org/10.1615/atomizspr.2016015626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li Y, Guo H, Ma X et al (2018) Morphology analysis on multi-jet flash-boiling sprays under wide ambient pressures. Fuel 211:38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo H, Ding H, Li Y et al (2017) Comparison of spray collapses at elevated ambient pressure and flash boiling conditions using multi-hole gasoline direct injector. Fuel 199:125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang Y, Huang S, Huang R, Hong G (2016) Spray and evaporation characteristics of ethanol and gasoline direct injection in non-evaporating, transition and flash-boiling conditions. Energy Convers Manag 108:68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.10.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Montanaro A, Allocca L, Lazzaro M (2017) Iso-octane spray from a GDI multi-hole injector under non- and flash boiling conditions. SAE Tech Pap Ser. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-2319
  19. 19.
    Aleiferis PG, van Romunde ZR (2013) An analysis of spray development with iso-octane, n-pentane, gasoline, ethanol and n-butanol from a multi-hole injector under hot fuel conditions. Fuel 105:143–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen R, Nishida K (2014) Spray evaporation of ethanol–gasoline-like blend and combustion of ethanol–gasoline blend injected by hole-type nozzle for direct-injection spark ignition engines. Fuel 134:263–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmitz I, Ipp W, Leipertz A (2002) Flash boiling effects on the development of gasoline direct-injection engine sprays. SAE Tech Pap Ser. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2661
  22. 22.
    van Romunde Z, Aleiferis PG (2009) Effect of operating conditions and fuel volatility on development and variability of sprays from gasoline direct-injection MULTIHOLE injectors. At Sprays 19:207–234.  https://doi.org/10.1615/atomizspr.v19.i3.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khan MM, Helie J, Gorokhovski M, et al (2012) Numerical analysis of multihole gasoline direct injection sprays. 12th International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Serras-Pereira J, Aleiferis PG, Richardson D, Wallace S (2008) Characteristics of ethanol, butanol, Iso-octane and gasoline sprays and combustion from a multi-hole injector in a DISI engine. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 1:893–909.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Mahabat Khan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nadeem Ahmed Sheikh
    • 3
  • Azfar Khalid
    • 1
  • Waqas Akbar Lughmani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCapital University of Science and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’AcoustiqueÉcullyFrance
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringHITEC UniversityTaxilaPakistan

Personalised recommendations