Skip to main content
Log in

3D simulation of polyurethane foam injection and reacting mold flow in a complex geometry

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to develop a flow model which can be used to determine the paths of the polyurethane foam in the mold filling process of a refrigerator cabinet so that improvements in the distribution and the size of the venting holes can be achieved without the expensive prototyping and experiments. For this purpose, the multi-component, two-phase chemically reacting flow is described by Navier Stokes and 12 scalar transport equations. The air and the multi-component foam zones are separated by an interface, which moves only with advection since the mass diffusion of species are set zero in the air zone. The inverse density, viscosity and other diffusion coefficients are calculated by a mass fraction weighted average of the corresponding temperature-dependent values of all species. Simulations are performed in a real refrigerator geometry, are able to reveal the problematical zones where air bubbles and voids trapped in the solidified foam are expected to occur. Furthermore, the approach proves itself as a reliable design tool to use in deciding the locations of air vents and sizing the channel dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klempner D, Sendijarevic V (2004) Handbook of polymeric foams and foam technology, 2nd edn. Hanser Publications, Cincinnatti

    Google Scholar 

  2. Federation of European Rigid Polyurethane Foam Associations. Report No: 1, Thermal insulation materials made of rigid polyurethane foam (PUR/PIR): Properties – Manufacture, October 2006

  3. Wu J-W, Sung W-F, Chu H-S (1999) Thermal conductivity of polyurethane foams. Int J Heat Mass Transf 42:2211–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris DB, Fogg B (1979) Rigid polyurethane foam: refrigerator cabinet design and construction. Int J Refrig 2:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond EC, Evans JA (2014) Application of vacuum insulation panels in the cold chain – analysis of viability. Int J Refrig 47:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozdemir IB, Akar F (2017) Effects of composition and temperature of initial mixture on the formation and properties of polyurethane foam. Adv Polym Technol

  7. Goods SH, Neuschwanger CL, Henderson C, Skala DM (1997) Mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of a polyurethane foam. Technical Paper SAND97–8490

  8. Maier U, Wirtz H-G, Fietz J, Frahm A, Rüb T (2005) Polyurethane Processing Systems, Bayer Material Science, (24)19:1–12

  9. Ashida K (2007) Polyurethane and related foams – chemistry and technology. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  10. Everitt SL, Harlen OG, Wilson HJ, Read DJ (2003) Bubble dynamics in viscoelastic fluids with application to reacting and non-reacting polymer foams. J Non-Newton Fluid 114:83–107

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Khazabi M (2015) Investigation of biopolyol spray foam insulation modified with natural fibers. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto

  12. Hobbs ML, Erickson KL, Chu TY (2000) Modeling decomposition of unconfined rigid polyurethane foam. Polym Degrad Stab 69:47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz LW, Roy RV (2003) A mathematical model for an expanding foam. J Colloid Interface Sci 264:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geier S, Winkler C, Piesche M (2009) Numerical simulation of mold filling processes with polyurethane foams. Chem Eng Technol 32:1438–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu W, Zhang H, Yang Z, Zhang J (2008) Numerical investigation on the flow characteristics and permeability of three-dimensional reticulated foam materials. Chem Eng J 140:562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YB, Kim KD, Hong SE, Kim JG, Park MH, Kim JH, Kweon JK (2005) Numerical simulation of PU foaming flow in a refrigerator cabinet. J Cell Plast 41:252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gopala VR, van Wachem BGM (2008) Volume of fluid methods for immiscible-fluid and free-surface flows. Chem Eng J 141:204–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sussman M, Smereka P, Osher S (1994) A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J Comput Phys 114:146–159

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Osher S, Fedkiw RP (2001) Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. J Comput Phys 169:463–502

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Unverdi SO, Tryggvason G (1992) A front-tracking method for viscous, incompressible multi-fluid flows. J Comput Phys 100:25–37

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Prosperetti A, Tryggvason G (2007) Computational methods for multiphase flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo D, Youn JR, Tucker CL (2003) Numerical simulation of mold filling in foam reaction injection molding. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 42:1105–1134

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitani T, Hamada H (2003) Prediction of flow patterns in the polyurethane foaming process by numerical simulation considering foam expansion. Polym Eng Sci 43:1603–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seo D, Youn JR (2005) Numerical analysis on reaction injection molding of polyurethane foam by using a finite volume method. Polymer 46:6482–6493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dodd AB, Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC (2009) Numerical examination of two-dimensional smolder structure in polyurethane foam. P Combust Inst 32:2497–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bikard J, Bruchon J, Coupez T, Silva L (2007) Numerical simulation of 3D polyurethane expansion during manufacturing process. Colloid Surface A 309:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kee RJ, Coltrin ME, Glarborg P (2005) Chemically reacting flow: theory and practice. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  28. Warnatz J (2002) HOMREA user guide, Steinbeis-Transferzentrum, Simulation Reaktiver Strömungen, Heidelberg

  29. Maier RS, Petzold LR, Rath W (1995) Parallel solution of large differential-algebraic systems. Concurrency: Practice and Experience 7:795–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferziger JH, Peric M (2002) Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. ANSYS FLUENT, Release 6.3, Analysis guide, ANSYS, Inc.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been funded by the Turkish Ministry of Industry (SANTEZ 01213.STZ-2012-1). The partial support by Arcelik Inc. is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İ. Bedii Özdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özdemir, İ.B., Akar, F. 3D simulation of polyurethane foam injection and reacting mold flow in a complex geometry. Heat Mass Transfer 54, 1281–1288 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2232-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2232-z

Navigation