Skip to main content
Log in

On the occurrence of admissible representations in the real Howe correspondence in stable range

  • Published:
manuscripta mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \(({\rm G, G'}) \subset {\rm Sp}({\rm W})\) be an irreducible real reductive dual pair of type I in stable range, with G the smaller member. In this note, we prove that all irreducible genuine representations of \(\tilde{\rm G}\) occur in the Howe correspondence. The proof uses structural information about the groups forming a reductive dual pair and estimates of matrix coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams J. and Barbasch D. (1995). Reductive dual pairs correspondence for complex groups. J. Funct. Anal. 132: 1–42

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hörmander L. (1983). The analysis of linear partial differential operator I. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howe, R.: θ-series and invariant theory. In: Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1, vol. XXXIII, pp. 275–285. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (1979)

  4. Howe, R.: On a notion of rank for unitary representations of classical groups. Harmonic analysis and group representations, pp. 223–331. Liguori, Naples (1982)

  5. Howe, R.: Small unitary representations of classical groups. In: Group representations, ergodic theory, operator algebras, and mathematical physics (Berkeley, 1984). Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 121–150. Springer, New York (1987)

  6. Howe R. (1989). Transcending Classical Invariant Theory. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2(2): 535–552

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J.-S. (1989). Singular unitary representations of classical groups. Invent. Math. 97(2): 237–255

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Li J.-S., Paul A., Tan E.-C. and Zhu C.-B. (2003). The explicit duality correspondence of \(({\rm Sp}(p,q), {\rm O}^*_{2n})\) J. Funct. Anal. 200(1): 71–100

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Moeglin C. (1989). Correspondance de Howe pour les paires duales reductives duales: quelques calculs dans la cas archimédien. J. Funct. Anal. 85: 1–85

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul A. (2005). On the Howe correspondence for symplectic-orthogonal dual pairs. J. Funct. Anal. 228(2): 270–310

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Przebinda T. (2006). Local Geometry of Orbits for an Ordinary Classical Lie Supergroup. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 4: 449–506

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallach N. (1988). Real Reductive Groups I. Academic Press, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Protsak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Protsak, V., Przebinda, T. On the occurrence of admissible representations in the real Howe correspondence in stable range. manuscripta math. 126, 135–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-007-0161-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-007-0161-8

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation