Marine Biology

, 166:34 | Cite as

Implications of range overlap in the commercially important pan-tropical sea urchin genus Tripneustes (Echinoidea: Toxopneustidae)

  • Omri BronsteinEmail author
  • Andreas Kroh
  • Ashley D. Miskelly
  • Stephen D. A. Smith
  • Symon A. Dworjanyn
  • Benjamin Mos
  • Maria Byrne
Short note


Sea urchins of the genus Tripneustes are among the most abundant and ecologically important pan-tropical marine invertebrates. Recognized as potent ecosystem engineers due to their intense grazing of macroalgae and sea grass and highly valued for their gonads, wild populations of Tripneustes are commercially exploited for fisheries and aquaculture. Recently, a new species, Tripneustes kermadecensis (Bronstein et al. 2017), was described from the southern Pacific Ocean, off the Kermadec Islands, near the tropical/sub-tropical transition zone. Here, we explore the range of Tripneustes and, in particular, T. kermadecensis by morphological and genetic tools to determine whether it also occurs in Australia. We report, for the first time, the presence of a second Tripneustes species, T. kermadecensis, from Australia. We show that T. kermadecensis is in fact highly abundant throughout most of sub-tropical eastern Australia, where it occurs in association with coral and temperate reefs and has been recognized for decades as the ‘lamington sea urchin’. As commercial exploitation and stock-release programs of Tripneustes are rapidly expanding, and as global warming causes tropicalization of eastern Australia, driving the southern expansion of its congener T. gratilla, we call for re-evaluation of the conservation vulnerability of T. kermadecensis along the Australian continent and action by the aquaculture industry to genetically confirm the species identity of stocks in their facilities.



Institutional support was provided by the Central Research Laboratories and the Department of Geology and Palaeontology at the Natural History Museum Vienna, Austria. We gratefully acknowledge Gustav Paulay (Florida Museum of Natural History), Francisco Solis-Marin (National Autonomous University of Mexico), and Baraka Kuguru (Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute) for assistance in obtaining the samples. Meirav Chen is acknowledged for graphical assistance. M. A. Sewell and an undisclosed reviewer are greatfully acknowledged for critically reading the manuscript and suggesting valuable comments. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): project number P 29508-B25.


Funding was provided by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): project number P 29508-B25.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

227_2019_3478_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (738 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 737 kb)


  1. Bronstein O, Loya Y (2014) Echinoid community structure and rates of herbivory and bioerosion on exposed and sheltered reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 456:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bronstein O, Kroh A, Haring E (2016) Do genes lie? Mitochondrial capture masks the Red Sea collector urchin’s true identity (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Tripneustes). Mol Phylogenet Evol 104:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bronstein O, Kroh A, Tautscher B, Liggins L, Haring E (2017) Cryptic speciation in pan-tropical sea urchins: a case study of an edge-of-range population of Tripneustes from the Kermadec Islands. Sci Rep 7(1):5948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronstein O, Kroh A, Haring E (2018) Mind the gap! The mitochondrial control region and its power as a phylogenetic marker in echinoids. BMC Evol Biol 18:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown PN, Eddy ES (2015) Echinoderm aquaculture. Wiley Blackwell, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne M, Gall M (2017) A tale of two urchins: Heliocidaris erythrogramma and H. tuberculata. In: Byrne M, O’Hara TD (eds) Australian echinoderms: biology ecology and evolution. CSIRO Press, CanberraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne M, O’Hara TD (eds) (2017) Australian echinoderms: biology ecology and evolution. CSIRO Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Juinio-Meñez MA, Bangi HG, Malay MC, Pastor D (2008) Enhancing the recovery of depleted Tripneustes gratilla stocks through grow-out culture and restocking. Rev Fish Sci 16:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koike I, Mukai H, Nojima S (1987) The role of the sea urchin, Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus), in decomposition and nutrient cycling in a tropical seagrass bed. Ecol Res 2:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kroh A, Mooi R (2018) World echinoidea database. Accessed 9 Sept 2018
  11. Lawrence JM (2007) Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawrence JM, Agatsuma Y (2013) Tripneustes. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Sea urchins: biology and ecology. Elsevier, New york, pp 491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lessios HA, Kane J, Robertson DR (2003) Phylogeography of the pantropical sea urchin Tripneustes: contrasting patterns of population structure between oceans. Evolution 57:2026–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ling SD, Barrett NS, Edgar GJ (2018) Facilitation of Australia’s southernmost reef-building coral by sea urchin herbivory. Coral Reefs 37:1053–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mortensen TH (1943) A monograph of the Echinoidea. Ill. 2. Camarodonta. I. Orthopsidæ, Glyyhocyphidæ, Temnopleuridæ and Toxopneustidæ. C. A. Reitzel, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  16. Mos B, Cowden KL, Nielsen SJ, Dworjanyn SA (2011) Do cues matter? Highly inductive settlement cues don’t ensure high post-settlement survival in sea urchin aquaculture. PLoS One 6:e28054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mos B, Byrne M, Cowden KL, Dworjanyn SA (2015) Biogenic acidification drives density-dependent growth of a calcifying invertebrate in culture. Mar Biol 162:1541–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mos B, Byrne M, Dworjanyn SA (2016) Biogenic acidification reduces sea urchin gonad growth and increases susceptibility of aquaculture to ocean acidification. Mar Env Res 113:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neilson BJ, Wall CB, Mancini FT, Gewecke CA (2018) Herbivore biocontrol and manual removal successfully reduce invasive macroalgae on coral reefs. Peer J 6:e5332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nimbs M, Smith S (2018) Beyond capricornia: tropical sea slugs (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) extend their distributions into the Tasman Sea. Diversity 10:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahman MA, Arshad A, Yusoff FM (2014) Sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): their biology, culture and bioactive compounds. In: Muzenda E, Yingthawornsuk T (eds) International conference on agricultural, ecological and medical sciences (AEMS-2014). International Institute of Chemical, Biological & Environmental Engineering (IICBEE), London, UK, pp 39–48Google Scholar
  22. Ridgway KR, Dunn JR (2003) Mesoscale structure of the mean East Australian Current System and its relationship with topography. Prog Oceanogr 56:189–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steneck RS (2013) Sea urchins as drivers of shallow benthic marine community structure. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Sea urchins: biology and ecology. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suthers IM, Young JM, Baird ME, Roughan MR, Everett JD, Brassington GB, Byrne M, Condie SA, Hartog JR, Hassler CS, Hobda AJ, Holbrook NJ, Malcolm HA, Oke PR, Thompson PA, Ridgway K (2011) The strengthening of the East Australian Current, its eddies and biological effects—an introduction and overview. Deep Sea Res Part II 58:538–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thorstad EB, Fleming IA, McGinnity P, Soto D, Wennevik V, Whoriskey F (2008) Incidence and impacts of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in nature. NINA Spec Rep 36:1–110Google Scholar
  26. Valentine JP, Edgar GJ (2010) Impacts of a population outbreak of the urchin Tripneustes gratilla amongst Lord Howe Island coral communities. Coral Reefs 29:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Veron J, Done T (1979) Corals and coral communities of Lord Howe Island. Mar Freshw Res 30:203–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williamson JE (2015) Sea urchin aquaculture in Australia. In: Brown NP, Eddy SD (eds) Echinoderm aquaculture. Wiley Blackwell, New York, pp 225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeng X, Zhang W (2012) Molecular Phylogenetics of the Genus Temnopleurus Based on 16S rRNA and COI Sequences. Periodical Ocean Univ Chin 42:47–51 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  30. Zigler KS, Byrne M, Raff EC, Lessios HA, Raff RA (2012) Natural hybridization in the sea urchin genus Pseudoboletia between species without apparent barriers to gamete recognition. Evolution 66:1695–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural History Museum ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.The Steinhardt Museum of Natural HistoryTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.The Sea Urchin Science Centre and GallerySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.National Marine Science CentreSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  5. 5.Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and EngineeringSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  6. 6.School of Medical SciencesUniversity of SydneyLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations