Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marine connectivity dynamics: clarifying cosmopolitan distributions of marine interstitial invertebrates and the meiofauna paradox

  • Student Review
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many interstitial species were first described as widely distributed, often cosmopolitan or amphi-oceanic, contrasting with descriptions of a sedentary life style and the general absence of pelagic dispersal stages. These inconsistencies became known as the “meiofauna paradox”. In this review, we present a literature review investigating these inconsistencies and address the assumptions of the meiofauna paradox. We break the paradox down to two aspects including species distribution and dispersal. Focusing on distribution, we demonstrate that wide distributions are seldom given and false records likely stem from biological phenomena like stasis or recent speciation. These phenomena account for morphological similarity, ultimately represented by the pronounced occurrence of cryptic species with restricted distribution ranges. Additionally, taxonomic artefacts such as the erroneous application of taxonomic keys contribute to the report of widely distributed species. Considering dispersal, we point out the mismatch between traditional assumptions of meiofaunal sedentarism and growing experimental and empirical evidences suggesting higher dispersal potential. These evidences include not only indications for dispersal by pelagic stages, but further consider ecological and life-history traits in shaping distribution ranges. We conclude that the meiofauna paradox sensu stricto most likely does not exist and provide a roadmap for future research, suggesting a focus on morphological similarity and marine connectivity. Meiofaunal research should concentrate on evolutionary factors resulting in morphological similarity, improving the taxonomic resolution of species complexes and conducting more sophisticated experimental experiments to meiofaunal dispersal. In all cases, meiofaunal research will benefit from high-throughput sequencing such as genome scanning approaches, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to two anonymous reviewers and Diego Fontaneto whose comments have considerably improved the original manuscript. JC is grateful to Zeca Afonso (among other thinkers) for inspiration (“Em cada esquina um amigo; Em cada rosto igualdade”). This is NHM Evolutionary Genomics Lab contribution No. 10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Cerca.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All authors have approved the submitted manuscript

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: S. Connell.

Reviewed by Undisclosed experts.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerca, J., Purschke, G. & Struck, T.H. Marine connectivity dynamics: clarifying cosmopolitan distributions of marine interstitial invertebrates and the meiofauna paradox. Mar Biol 165, 123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3383-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3383-2

Navigation