Marine Biology

, 165:84 | Cite as

Memory of direction of locomotion in sea urchins: effects of nerves on direction and activity of tube feet

  • Kazuya Yoshimura
  • Hajimu Tsurimaki
  • Tatsuo Motokawa
Original paper

Abstract

Memory and learning in invertebrates with decentralized nervous systems is poorly understood and sea urchins are no exception. Following up on previous studies of locomotory direction in sea urchins, the regular sea urchin, Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus was used to examine whether they have directionality and ‘memory’ of direction in locomotion. Experiments were conducted in 2011–2013 on urchins collected from the subtidal rocky area off the Aburatsubo coast, Kanagawa, Japan. The sea urchins locomoted mainly with their tube feet. Individuals retained their directional locomotion in two successive trials separated by a resting period. This implies memory of the original direction and is termed “directional memory”. This memory was retained when the resting period was 5 min but disappeared when the period was extended to 10 min. Such directional memory was also observed in cutaway preparations in which the aboral one-third of the test was removed along with the viscera. The radial nerves (RNs) were severed in cutaway preparations to study their roles in memory and activities of the tube feet. The speed of locomotion was proportional to the total length of the RNs. When all RNs were separated from the nerve ring, the preparation continued to attach firmly to the substrate. When all RNs but one were cut at the midpoint, preparations locomoted keeping the ambulacrum with the uncut, longest RN forward. When all RNs were cut at the midpoint, directional memory was observed without the interference of the longest RN. A model in which each ambulacrum assumes one of four modes (leading, trailing, attached, or retracted) with its tube feet being controlled and coordinated by the RN, and where mode switching is caused by the mechanical pull of other ambulacra and or via the RN–ring system accounts for these findings.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of Misaki Marine Biological Station for collecting H. pulcherrimus. We would like to express thanks to Mr. Y. Miwa for technical assistance. We would like to express thanks to Dr. O. Ellers of Bowdoin College for improvement of English description of our manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Cobb JLS (1970) The significance of the radial nerve cords in asteroids and echinoids. Z Zellforsch 108:457–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cobb JLS (1982) The anatomical basis of integratory mechanisms in echinoderms. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Proceedings of the int. echinoderm conf., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 409–412Google Scholar
  4. Cobb JLS (1987) Neurobiology of the echinodermata. In: Ali MA (ed) Nervous systems in invertebrates. Plenum, New York, pp 483–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen-Rengifo M, Moureaux C, Dubois P, Flammang P (2017) Attachment capacity of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in a range of seawater velocities in relation to test morphology and tube foot mechanical properties. Mar Biol 164:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connolly DM, Desvignes T, Williamson JE (2017) Influence of body size on tube feet morphology and attachment capacity in the sea urchin Holopneustes purpurascens (Temnopleuridae). Mar Biol 164:223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denny M (1999) Are there mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms? J Exp Biol 202:3463–3467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Domenici P, Gonzales-Calderon D, Ferrari RS (2003) Locomotor performance in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividis. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flammang P (1996) Adhesion in echinoderms. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC (2009) Multiple comparison procedures. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyman LH (1955) The invertebrates: echinodermata, 4. Echinoidea. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerkut GA (1953) The forces exerted by the tube feet of the starfish during locomotion. J Exp Biol 30:575–583Google Scholar
  13. Kerkut GA (1954) The mechanisms of coordination of the starfish tube feet. Behavior 6:206–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lal SP, Yamada K, Endo S (2008) Emergent motion characteristics of a modular robot through genetic algorithm. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5227:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrence JM (1987) A functional biology of echinoderms. Croom Held, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. McClintock JB, Lawrence JM (1982) Photoresponse and associative learning in Luidia clathrata say (Ecinodermata: Asteroidea). Mar Behav Physiol 9:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCurley RS, Kier WM (1995) The functional morphology of starfish tube feet: the role of a crossed-fiber helical array in movement. Biol Bull 188:197–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Romanes GJ, Ewart JC (1881) Observations on the locomotor system of Echinodermata. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 172:829–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith JE (1945) The role of the nervous system in some activities of starfish. Biol Rev 20:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ullrich-Lüter EM, Dupont S, Arboleda E, Hausen H, Arnone MI (2011) Unique system of photoreceptors in sea urchin tube feet. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:8367–8372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Yoshimura K, Motokawa T (2008) Bilateral symmetry and locomotion: do elliptical regular sea urchins proceed along their longer body? Mar Biol 154:911–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoshimura K, Motokawa T (2010) Bilaterality in the regular sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina is related to efficient defense not to efficient locomotion. Mar Biol 157:2475–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshimura K, Iketani T, Motokawa T (2012) Do regular sea urchins show preference in which part of the body they orient forward in their walk? Mar Biol 159:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuya Yoshimura
    • 1
  • Hajimu Tsurimaki
    • 2
  • Tatsuo Motokawa
    • 2
  1. 1.Science and Education CenterOchanomizu UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Bioscience and BiotechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations