Marine Biology

, 165:78 | Cite as

Comparative growth increments of gladius surface and cross-sections to estimate Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis age

  • Xue Feng Wang
  • Bi Lin LiuEmail author
  • Jian Hua Li
  • Rui Jiang
  • Jing Yuan Lin
  • Teng Li


The age of the purpleback flying squid (Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis) has been widely studied over its geographic range based on hard structure analysis, especially the statolith. In this study, we propose an additional method for estimating the age of S. oualaniensis using growth increments in the gladius. Our results show regular growth increments in the proostracum dorsal surface and stem cross-sections. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between statolith and gladius readings showed the formation of increments in stem cross-sections to be daily, assuming that the formation of increments is daily in statoliths. A progressively more faint microstructure in the half-posterior part of the gladius possibly explains why the number of growth increments in the proostracum dorsal surface is less than the statolith-determined age. The low average percentage error and coefficient of variation indicate that our modified processing and counting methods are reliable. We believe that using growth increments in the gladius stem cross-section is a feasible alternative tool for determining the age of S. oualaniensis, whereas using growth increments in the proostracum dorsal surface is more informative for reconstructing ontogenetic life history.



Special thanks goes to the reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. The Project was jointly funded by the Ministry of Agriculture Programs for light falling net survey for pelagic fish in the Central Pacific Ocean (2014), the Provincial Programs for the Rising Young Teachers (YQ2014002), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201403008), the Project of Enhancing School with Innovation of Guangdong Ocean University (2013050247) and National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (201410566002). We thank Dr. Pauline H. Lovell for editing the English text.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the coauthors has ethical issues arising from conflicts of interest.

Research involving animals

The samples were taken with the permission of the Shanghai Ocean University which is in charge of oceanic fisheries research in China. All the sampling protocols have been evaluated and approved by the Shanghai Ocean University, and the samples were taken strictly following protocol.


  1. Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA (1991) A comparative analysis of age and growth estimation using statoliths and Gladius in squids. In: Jereb P, Ragonese S, Boletzky SV (eds) Squid age determination using statoliths. Proceedings of the international workshop. NTR–ITPP special publications, no 1. Instituto di Tecnologia della Pesca e del Pescato, Mazara del Vallo, Italy, 9–14 October 1989, pp 19–33Google Scholar
  2. Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA (1997) Statolith shape and microstructure in studies o f systematics, age and growth in planktonic paralarvae of gonatid squids (Cephalopoda, Oegopsida) from the western Bering Sea. J Plankton Res 19(12):1993–2030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkhipkin AI, Perez JAA (1998) Life history reconstruction. In: Rodhouse PG, Dawe EG, O’Dor RK (eds) Squid recruitment dynamics: the genus Illex as a model, the commercial Illex species. Influences on variability. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap, Rome, pp 157–180Google Scholar
  4. Arkhipkin AI, Shcherbich ZN (2012) Thirty years’ progress in age determination of squid using statoliths. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 92(6):1389–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA, Fuchs D (2012) Vestigial phragmocone in the gladius points to a deepwater origin of squid (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Deep Sea Res I 61:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barratt IM, Allcock AL (2010) Ageing octopods from stylets development of a technique for permanent preparations. ICES J Mar Sci 67:1452–2457Google Scholar
  7. Beamish RJ, Fournier DA (1981) A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:982–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettencourt V, Guerra A (2001) Age studies based on daily growth increments in statoliths and growth lamellae in cuttlebone of cultured Sepia officinalis. Mar Biol 139:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bizikov VA (1987) New data on squid gladius structure. Zool Zh 46(2):177–184Google Scholar
  10. Bizikov VA (1991) A new method of squid age determination using the gladius. In: Jereb P, Ragonese S, Boletzky SV (eds) Squid age determination using statoliths. Proceedings of the international workshop. NTR–ITPP special publications, no 1. Instituto di Tecnologia della Pesca e del Pescato, Mazara del Vallo, Italy, 9–14 October 1989, pp 39–51Google Scholar
  11. Bizikov VA (1995) Growth of the squid Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis (Lesson, 1830) form a new method based on Gladius microstructure. ICES Mar Sci Symp 199:445–459Google Scholar
  12. Bizikov VA (1996) Atlas of morphology and anatomy of the gladius of squid. VNIRO Publishing, Moscow, p 248 (In Russian with English summary) Google Scholar
  13. Bizikov VA (2008) Evolution of the shell in cephalopod. VNIRO Publishing, Moscow, p 444 (In Russian with English summary) Google Scholar
  14. Cárdenas EB, Correa SM, Guzman RC, Barahona N, Briceño F, Villegas MJ, Paredes R (2011) Eye lens structure of the octopus Enteroctopus megalocyathus: evidence of growth. J Shellfish Res 30(2):199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang WYB (1982) A statistical method for evaluating the reproducibility of age determination. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:1208–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen XJ, Liu BL, Qian WG, Tian SQ, Zhao XH (2007) Fishery biology of purpleback squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis, in the northwest Indian Ocean. Fish Res 83:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choe S (1963) Daily age marking on the shell of cuttlefishes. Nature 197:306–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chung MT, Wang CH (2013) Age validation of the growth lamellae in the cuttlebone from cultured Sepia pharaonis at different stages. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 447:132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doubleday ZA, Semmens JM, Pecl G, Jackson G (2006) Assessing the validity of stylets as ageing tools in Octopus pallidus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 338:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doubleday ZA, White J, Pecl G, Semmens JM (2011) Age determination in merobenthic octopuses using stylet increment analysis: assessing future challenges using Macroctopus maorum as a model. ICES J Mar Sci 68(10):2059–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermosilla CA, Rocha F, Fiorito G, González ÁF, Guerra Á (2010) Age validation in common octopus Octopus vulgaris using stylet increment analysis. ICES J Mar Sci 67:1458–1463Google Scholar
  22. Hernández-López JL, Castro-Hernández JL, Hernández-garica V (2001) Age determined from the daily deposition of concentric rings on common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) beaks. Fish B-NOAA 99:679–684Google Scholar
  23. Iglesias J, Fuentes L, Villanueva R (2014) Cephalopod culture. Springer Press, New York, p 493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson GD (2004) Advances in defining the life histories of myopsid squid. Mar Freshw Res 55:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson GD, Arkhipkin AI, Bizikov VA (1993) Hanlon RT (1993) Laboratory and field corroboration of age and growth from statoliths and gladii of the loliginid squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). In: Okutani T, O’Dor R, Kubodera T (eds) Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 189–199Google Scholar
  26. Jereb P, Roper CFE (2010) Cephalopods of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of cephalopod species known to date. Myopsid Oegopsid Squids 2:649Google Scholar
  27. Krstulović-Šifner S (2008) Method for age and growth determination in cephalopods. Ribarstvo 66(1):25–34Google Scholar
  28. LaRoe ET (1971) The culture and maintenance of the lologinid squids Sepioteuthis sepioidea and Doryteuthis plei. Mar Biol 9:9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leporati SC, Semmens JM, Peel GT (2008) Determining the age and growth of wild octopus using stylet increment analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 367:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lipinski MR, Underhill LG (1995) Sexual maturation in squid: quantum or continuum. S Afr J Mar Sci 15:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu BL, Chen XJ, Zhong JS (2009) Age, growth and population structure of squid Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis in Northwest Indian Ocean by statolith microstructure. Chin J Dalian Fish U 24(3):206–212 (In Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  32. Liu BL, Chen XJ, Chen Y, Hu GY (2015) Determination of squid age using upper beak rostrum sections technique improvement and comparison with the statolith. Mar Biol 162:1685–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu BL, Chen XJ, Li JH, Chen Y (2016) Age, growth and maturation of Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean by statolith analysis. Mar Freshw Res 67(12):1973–1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu BL, Lin JY, Feng CL, Li JH, Su H (2017a) Estimation of age, growth and maturation of purpleback flying squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis, in the Bashi Channel, Central Pacific Ocean. J Ocean U China 16(3):525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu BL, Chen XJ, Chen Y, Hu GY, Yu W, Wang JT, Lin JH (2017b) Periodic increments in Jumbo squid beak: a potential tool for determining age and investigating regional difference in growth rates. Hydrobiologia 790(1):83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKinnon JF (2006) Aspects of the population biology of the southern arrow squid, Nototodarus sloanii, in Southern New Zealand. Ph.D. Thesis, the University of Otago, Dunedin New Zealand, pp 282Google Scholar
  37. Naef A (1922) Die Cephalopoda. Fauna Flora Golfes von Neapel Monogr. Israel Program for Scientific translations, published for the Smithsonian Institution and the National Science Foundation, no 35(1). Printed by Wiener Bindery Ltd., JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  38. Perales-Raya C, Hernández-González CL (1998) Growth lines within the beak microstructure of the Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797. S Afr J Mar Sci 20:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perales-Raya C, BartoloméA García-Santamaría MT, Pascual-Alayón P, Almansa E (2010) Age estimation obtained from analysis of octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797) beaks: improvements and comparisons. Fish Res 106:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perales-Raya C, Almansa E, Bartolomé A, Felipe BC, Iglesias J, Sánchez FJ, Carrasco JF, Rodríguez C (2014) Age validation in Octopus vulgaris beaks across the full ontogenetic range: beaks as recorders of live events in octopuses. J Shellfish Res 33(2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perez JAA, O’Dor RK (1998) The impact of environmental gradients on the early life inshore migration of the short finned squid Illex illecebrosus. S Afr J Mar Sci 20(1):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perez JAA, O’Dor RK (2000) Critical transitions in early life histories of shortfinned squid, Illex illecebrosus, as reconstructed from gladius growth. J Mar Biol Ass UK 80:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perez JAA, O’Dor RK, Beck P, Dawe EG (1996) Evaluation of gladius dorsal surface structure for age and growth studies of the short-finned squid, Illex illecebrosus (Teuthoidea: Ommastrephidae). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:2837–2846Google Scholar
  44. Perez JAA, de Aguiar DC, dos Santos JAT (2006) Gladius and statolith as tools for age and growth studies of the squid Loligo plei (Teuthida Loliginidae) off Southern Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Tech 49(5):747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reis CS, Fernandes R (2002) Growth Observations on Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 from the Portuguese waters growth lines in the vestigial shell as possible tools for age determination. Bull Mar Sci 71(2):1099–1103Google Scholar
  46. Richard A (1969) The part played by temperature in the rhythm of formation of markings on the shell of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis L. (Mollusque, Cephalopod). Experientia 25:1051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schroeder R, Perez JAA (2010) The study of intra-specific growth variability of Illex argentinus (Cephalopoda Teuthida) in Brazilian waters as reconstructed from the gladius microstructure. Fish Res 106:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schroeder R, Perez JAA (2013) Individual growth of the squid Illex argentinus off Brazil as reconstructed from the gladius microstructure. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 93(6):1653–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spratt JD (1978) Age and growth of the market squid, Loligo opalescens, Berry, in Monterey Bay. Fish Bull 169:35–44Google Scholar
  50. Sukramongkol N, Promjinda S, Prommas R (2007) Age and Reproduction of Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis in the Bay of Bengal. In: The proceedings of the workshop on ecosystem-based fishery management in the Bay of Bengal, Thailand, September, 2008. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, pp 195–205Google Scholar
  51. Takagi K, Yatsu A (1996) Age determination using Statolith microstructure of the purpleback fling squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis, in the North Pacific Ocean. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 65(2):98–113 (In Japanese) Google Scholar
  52. Takagi K, Kitahara T, Suzuki N, Mori J, Yatsu A (2002) The age and growth of Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in the Pacific Ocean. Bull Mar Sci 71(2):1105–1108Google Scholar
  53. Wang XH, Qiu YS, Zhang P, Du FY (2017) Natural mortality estimation and rational exploitation of purpleback flying squid Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis in the southern South China Sea. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 35(4):902–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Bin Zakaria MZ (2000). Age and Growth Studies of Oceanic Squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis using Statoliths in the South China Sea, Area III, Western Philippines. In: Proceedings of the SEAFDEC Seminar on Fishery Resources in the South China Sea, Area III, vol 44, pp 118–134. Western PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  55. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang P, Yang L, Zhang XF, Tan YG (2010) The present status and prospect on exploitation of tuna and squid fishery resources in South China Sea. South China Fish Sci 6(1):68–74 (In Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xue Feng Wang
    • 1
  • Bi Lin Liu
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  • Jian Hua Li
    • 2
  • Rui Jiang
    • 2
  • Jing Yuan Lin
    • 2
  • Teng Li
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Fisheries ScienceGuangdong Ocean UniversityZhanjiangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Marine SciencesShanghai Ocean UniversityLingang New CityPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.The Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries ResourcesMinistry of EducationLingang New CityPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.National Engineering Research Center for Oceanic FisheriesLingang New CityPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Key Laboratory of Oceanic Fisheries ExplorationMinistry of AgricultureLingang New CityPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Oceanic Fishery ResourcesMinistry of AgricultureLingang New CityPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations