Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 165:31 | Cite as

Non-native species colonization of highly diverse, wave swept outer coast habitats in Central California

  • Chela J. Zabin
  • Michelle Marraffini
  • Steve I. Lonhart
  • Linda McCann
  • Lina Ceballos
  • Chad King
  • James Watanabe
  • John S. Pearse
  • Gregory M. Ruiz
Original paper

Abstract

More non-native species (NNS) are reported from harbors, estuaries and protected embayments than in wave-exposed, open-coast habitats. In California (USA), hundreds of NNS have become established in international ports, and dozens are known from smaller estuaries. In contrast, only 22 NNS are reported from the state’s 1350 km of open coast. As a result, the perception that open-coast habitats are not vulnerable to invasions has persisted. Management and monitoring focuses on ports and estuaries; the last major monitoring effort on the open coast occurred in 2004. Much of the species-rich Central California coast is now part of a network of marine protected areas (MPAs). We surveyed 12 wave-swept rocky intertidal and eight subtidal sites (from 37°53′40N 122°42′30W to 36°31′16N 121°56′22W) for NNS. At least one NNS was detected at half of the sites surveyed, but most were not widespread or abundant. One exception, a bryozoan in the Watersipora spp. complex, known primarily from ports and estuaries, was found at multiple sites, and was abundant at some. Another non-native, the alga Caulacanthus ustulatus, was abundant at a single site. MPAs were just as likely as sites outside of MPAs to have NNS. For subtidal sites, proximity to a harbor was correlated with the abundance of non-natives. Our findings suggest that our study area is still relatively uninvaded, but the success of Watersipora within some of these highly diverse rocky shore sites underscores the potential vulnerability of high-value open-coast systems to invasions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in part under contract to GMR by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Invasive Species Program, Agreement number P1475001. We thank James T. Carlton and Kathy Ann Miller for assistance in developing our target species list. Kathy Ann Miller provided taxonomic expertise for the algae and David Elvin for sponges. Carrie Craig, Blu Forman, Brandy Gale, Vanesa Guerra, Josie Iselin, Carlianne Johnson, Melinda Wheelock, Heather Fulton-Bennett, and Chris Scianni assisted with field surveys; Daniel M. Cox and Blu Forman assisted with graphics. We thank numerous students from Stanford University’s Hopkins Marine Station for collecting data and Freya Sommer for assisting with the logistics of dive operations there. We also thank the reviewers for suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript, and Andrew L. Chang, Laura Jurgens and Patrick Alderich for advice on statistics.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Animal ethics

All animals and plants have been sampled according to state and federal guidelines, and all required research permits and permissions were obtained.

Supplementary material

227_2018_3284_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (171 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 170 kb)

References

  1. Abbott IA, Hollenberg GJ (1976) Marine algae of California. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken E (2014) Underwater tumbleweeds: an exclusive look at an invasive bryozoan (Watersipora subtorquata) in Monterey Harbor. Senior thesis, California State University Monterey BayGoogle Scholar
  3. Albins MA, Hixon MA (2008) Invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 367:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albins MA, Hixon MA (2013) Worst case scenario: potential long-term effects of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans) on Atlantic and Caribbean coral-reef communities. Environ Biol Fish 96:1151–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aplikioti M, Louizidou P, Mystikou A, Marcou M, Stavrou P, Kalogirou S, Tsiamis K, Panayotidis P, Küpper FC (2015) Further expansion of the alien seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia var. distichophylla (Sonder) Verlaque, Huisman & Procacini (Ulvophyceae, Bryopsidales) in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Aquat Invasions 11:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ardura A, Juanes F, Planes S, Garcia-Vazquez E (2016) Rate of biological invasions is lower in coastal marine protected areas. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33013 Google Scholar
  7. Ashton G, Davidson IC, Ruiz GM (2014) Transient small boats as a long-distance coastal vector for dispersal of biofouling organisms. Estuaries Coasts 37:1572–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashton G, Zabin C, Davidson I, Ruiz G (2011) Aquatic invasive species vector risk assessments: recreational vessels as vectors for non-native marine species in California. Final report to the California Ocean Science TrustGoogle Scholar
  9. Bacela-Spychalska K, Grabowski M, Rewicz T, Konopacka A, Wattier R (2013) The ‘killer-shrimp’ Dikerogrammarus villosus (Crustacea, Amphipoda) invading Alpine lakes: overland transport by recreational boats and scuba-diving gear as potential entry vectors? Aquat Conserv 23:606–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barry JP, Baxter CH, Sagarin RD, Gilman SE (1995) Climate-related, long-term faunal changes in a California rocky intertidal community. Science 267:672–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W (2003) Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Mar Policy 27:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullard SG, Lambert G, Carman MR, Byrnes J, Whitlatch RB, Ruiz G, Miller RJ, Harris L, Valentine PC, Collie JS, Pederson J, McNaught DC, Cohen AN, Asch RG, Dijkstra J, Heinonen K (2007) The colonial ascidian Didemnum sp. A: current distribution, basic biology and potential threat to marine communities of the northeast and west coasts of North America. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulleri F, Airoldi L (2005) Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non-indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea. J Appl Ecol 42:1063–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bumbeer J, Moreira da Rocha R (2016) Invading the natural marine substrates: a case study with invertebrates in South Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba).  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689zool-20150211 Google Scholar
  15. Burfeind DS, Pitt KA, Connolly RM, Byers JE (2013) Performance of non-native species within marine reserves. Biol Invasions 15:17–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) California Marine Life Protection Act Plan for Protected Areas. Updated draft November 2015Google Scholar
  17. Carlton JT (ed) (2007) The Light & Smith manual: intertidal invertebrates from central California to Oregon, 4th edn. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlton JT, Ruiz GM (2005) Vector science and integrated vector management in bioinvasion ecology: conceptual frameworks. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 36–58Google Scholar
  19. Carlton JT (1999) The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlton JT (1979) History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and estuarine invertebrates of the Pacific Coast of North America. Dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  21. Caro AU, Guiñez R, Ortiz V, Castilla JC (2011) Competition between a native mussel and a non-indigenous invader for primary space on intertidal rocky shores in Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 428:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cavole L-CM, Demko AM, Diner RE, Giddings A, Koester I, Pagniello CM, Paulsen M-L, Ramirez-Valdez A, Schwenck SM, Yen NK (2016) Biological impacts of the 2013–2015 warm-water anomaly in the Northeast Pacific. Oceanography 29:273–285.  https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cebrian E, Linares C, Marschal C, Garrabou J (2012) Exploring the effects of invasive algae on persistence of gorgonian populations. Biol Invasions 14:2647–2656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chapman ARO, Johnson CR (1990) Disturbance and organization of macroalgal assemblages in the Northwestern Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 192:77–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clarke Murray C, Pakhomov EA, Thierrault TW (2011) Recreational boating: a large unregulated vector transporting marine invasive species. Divers Distrib 6:1161–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Claudet J, Fraschetti S (2010) Human-drive impacts on marine habitats: a regional meta-analysis in the Mediterranean Sea. Biol Conserv 143:2195–2206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cohen AN, Harris LH, Bingham BL, Carlton JT, Chapman JW, Lambert CC, Lambert G, Ljubenkov JC, Murray SN, Rao LC, Reardon K, Schwindt E (2005) Rapid Assessment Survey for exotic organisms in southern California bays and harbors, and abundance in port and non-port areas. Biol Invasions 7:995–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta: a Report for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. and the National Sea Grant College Program, Connecticut Sea Grant. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  29. Culver CS, Kuris AM (2000) The apparent eradication of a locally established introduced marine pest. Biol Invasions 2:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dafforn KA, Glasby TM, Airoldi L, Rivero NK, Mayer-Pinto M, Johnston EL (2015) Marine urbanization: an ecological framework for designing multifunctional artificial structures. Front Ecol Environ 1:82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1890/140050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davidson SK, Haygood MG (1999) Identification of sibling species of the bryozoan Bugula neritina that produce different anticancer bryostatins and harbor distinct strains of the bacterial symbiont “Candidatus Endobugula setulata”. Biol Bull 196:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dethier MN, Graham ES, Cohen S, Tear LM (1993) Visual versus random-point percent cover estimations: ‘objective’ is not always better. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 96:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diez I, Secilla A, Santolaria A, Gorostiaga JM (1999) Phytobenthic intertidal community structure along an environmental pollution gradient. Mar Pollut Bull 38:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Edelist D, Rilov G, Golani D, Carlton JT, Spanier E (2012) Restructuring the sea: profound shifts in the world’s most invaded marine ecosystem. Divers Distrib.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12002 Google Scholar
  35. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farrell P, Fletcher RL (2006) An investigation of dispersal of the introduced brown alga Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar and its competition with some species on the man-made structures of Torquay Marina (Devon, UK). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 334:236–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fenner D, Banks K (2004) Orange cup coral Tubastraea coccinea invades Florida and the Flower Garden Banks, northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Coral Reefs 23:505–507Google Scholar
  38. Floerl O, Inglis GJ (2005) Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biol Invasions 7:589–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fofonoff PW, Ruiz GM, Steves B, Carlton JT (2017) California non-native estuarine and marine organisms (Cal-NEMO) system. http://invasions.si.edu/nemesis/calnemo/intro.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2017
  40. Foss S (2008) Introduced aquatic species and marine and estuarine waters of California. Report to California State Legislature, California Department of Fish and Game, Office of Oil Spill Prevention and ResponseGoogle Scholar
  41. Galil BS (2011) The alien crustaceans in the Mediterranean Sea: an historical review. In: Clark PF, Carlton JT (eds) In the wrong place—alien marine crustaceans: distribution, biology and impacts, invading nature, vol 6. Springer series in invasion ecology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 377–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Glasby TM, Connell SD, Holloway MG, Hewitt CL (2007) Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? Mar Biol 151:887–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gordon DP (1967) A report on the ectoproct polyzoa of some Auckland shores. Tane 13:43–76Google Scholar
  44. Griffiths CL, Hockey PAR, Van Erkom Schurink C, Le Roux PJ (1992) Marine invasive aliens on South African shores: implications for community structure and tropillic functioning. Afr J Mar Sci 12:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Guidetti P, Baiata P, Ballesteros E, Di Franco A, Hereu B, Macpherson E, Micheli F, Pais A, Panzalis P, Rosenberg AA, Zabala M, Sala E (2014) Large-scale assessment of Mediterranean marine protected areas effects on fish assemblages. PLoS ONE 9:e91841.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hackerott S, Valdiva A, Green SJ, Cote IM, Cox CE, Akins L, Precht WF, Bruno JF (2013) Native predators do not influence invasion success of Pacific lionfish on Caribbean reefs. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068259 Google Scholar
  47. Hedgpeth JW (1968) Newcomers to the Pacific coast: the estuarine itinerants. In: Ricketts EF, Calvin J, Hedgpeth JW (eds) Between pacific tides, 4th edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 376–380Google Scholar
  48. Hilbish TJ, Brannock PM, Jones KR, Smith AB, Bullock BN, Wethey DS (2010) Historical changes in the distributions of invasive and endemic marine invertebrates are contrary to global warming predictions: the effects of decadal climate oscillations. J Biogeogr 37:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jeschke JM, Aparicio LG, Haider S, Heger T, Lortie CJ, Pysek P, Strayer DL (2012) Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johns CV, Brownstein G, Blick RAJ, Erskine PD, Fletcher AT (2015) Testing the power of a wetland vegetation monitoring survey design to detect change based on visual cover estimates. Wetlands 35:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaplanis NJ, Harris JL, Smith JE (2016) Distribution patterns of non-native seaweeds Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh and Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar on the San Diego and Pacific coast of North America. Aquat Invasions 11:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kappel CV (2005) Losing pieces of the puzzle: threats to marine, estuarine, and diadromous species. Front Ecol Environ 3:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keller BD, Gleason DF, McLeod E, Woodley CM, Airame S, Causey BD, Friedlander AM, Grober-Dunsmore R, Johnson JE, Miller SL, Steneck RS (2009) Climate change, coral reef ecosystems, and management options for marine protected areas. Environ Manag 44:1069–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kuhlenkamp R, Kind B (2013) Arrival of the invasive Watersipora subtorquata (Bryozoa) at Helgoland (Germany, North Sea) on floating macroalgae (Himanthalia). Mar Biodivers Rec 6:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuris AM, Culver CS (1999) An introduced sabellid polychaete pest infesting cultured abalones and its potential spread to other California gastropods. Invertebr Biol 118:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ladd MC, Collado-Vides L (2013) Practical applications of monitoring results to improve managing for coral reef resilience: a case study in the Mexican Caribbean. Biodivers Conserv 22:591–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lages BG, Fleury BG, Menegola C, Creed JC (2011) Change in tropical rocky shore communities due to an alien coral invasion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 438:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leising AW, Schroeder ID, Bograd SJ, Abell J, Durazo R, Gaxiola-Castro G, Bjorkstedt EP, Field J, Sakuma K, Robertson RR, Goericke R, Peterson WT, Brodeur RD, Barceló C, Auth TD, Daly EA, Suryan RM, Gladics AJ, Porquez JM, McClatchie S, Weber ED, Watson W, Santora JA, Sydeman WJ, Melin SR, Chavez FP, Golightly RT, Schneider SR, Fisher J, Morgan C, Bradley R, Warybok P (2015) State of the California current 2014–15: impacts of the warm-water “Blob”. CalCOFI Rep 56:31–68Google Scholar
  59. Leppäkoski E, Shiganova T, Alexandrov B (2009) European enclosed and semi-enclosed seas. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems: ecological, management, and geographic perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 529–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Levin LA, Crooks JA (2011) Functional consequences of invasive species in coastal and estuarine systems. In: Wolanski E, McLusky D (eds) Treatise on estuarine and coastal science, vol 7. Functioning of ecosystems at the land–ocean interface. Academic Press, London, pp 17–51Google Scholar
  61. Lewis JA, Coutts ADM (2010) Biofouling invasions. In: Durr S, Thomason CJ (eds) Biofouling. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 348–365Google Scholar
  62. Mackie JA, Darling JA, Geller JB (2012) Ecology of cryptic invasions: latitudinal segregation among Watersipora (Bryozoa) species. Sci Rep 2:871.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Maggi E, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Castelli A, Chatzinikolaou E, Crowe TP, Ghedini G, Kotta J, Lyons DA, Ravaglioli C, Rilov G, Rindi L, Bulleri F (2015) Ecological impacts of invading seaweeds: a meta-analysis of their effects at different trophic levels. Divers Distrib 21:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Malherbe H, Samways M (2014) Rocky shores of a major southern African Marine Protected Area are almost free from intertidal invertebrate alien species. Koedoe 56: Art. #1206Google Scholar
  65. Maloney E, Fairey R, Lyman A, Reynolds K, Sigala M (2006) Introduced aquatic species in California open coastal waters. Final report. California Department of Fish and Game. Office of Spill Prevention and Response, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  66. Marks LM, Salinas-Ruiz P, Reed DC, Holbrook SJ, Culver CS, Engle JM, Kushner DJ, Caselle JE, Freiwald J, Williams JP, Smith JR, Aguilar-Rosas LE, Kaplanis NJ (2015) Range expansion of a non-native, invasive macroalga Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh, 1820 in the eastern Pacific. Bioinvasions Rec 4:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marraffini ML, Geller JB (2015) Species richness and interacting factors control invasibility of a marine community. Proc R Soc B 282:20150439.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miller KA, Aguilar-Rosas LE, Pedroche FF (2011) A review of non-native seaweeds from California, USA and Baja California, Mexico. Hidrobiologica 21:365–379Google Scholar
  69. Miller KA, Engle JM (2009) The natural history of Undaria pinnatifida and Sargassum filicinum at the California Channel Islands: non-native seaweeds with different invasion styles. In: Damiani CC, Garcelon DK (eds). Proceedings of the 7th California islands symposium. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Arcata, CA. pp 131–140Google Scholar
  70. Morton JE, Miller MC (1968) The New Zealand Sea Shore. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Needles LA, Wendt DE (2013) Big changes to a small bay: introduced species and long-term compositional shifts to the fouling community of Morro Bay (CA). Biol Invasions 15:1231–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nguyen V, Greenville AC, Dickman CR, Wardle GM (2015) On the validity of visual cover estimates for time series analyses: a case study of hummock grasslands. Plant Ecol 216:975–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (2015) Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Condition Report Partial Update: A New Assessment of the State of Sanctuary Resources US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  74. Otero M, Cebrian E, Francour P, Galil B, Savini D (2013) Monitoring marine invasive species in Mediterranean marine protected areas (MPAs): a strategy and practical guide for managers. IUCN, MalagaGoogle Scholar
  75. Page HM, Dugan JE, Culver CS, Hoesterey JC (2006) Exotic invertebrate species on offshore oil platforms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 325:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pister B (2009) Urban marine ecology in southern California: the ability of riprap structures to serve as rocky intertidal habitat. Mar Biol 156:861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Preisler RK, Wasson K, Wolff JW, Tyrrell MC (2009) Invasions of estuaries vs. the adjacent open coast: a global perspective. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems: ecological, management and geographic perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 587–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  79. Relini G, Relini M, Torchia G (2000) The role of fishing gear in the spreading of allochthonous species: the case of Caulerpa taxifolia in the Ligurian sea. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1421–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ricketts EF, Calvin J, Hedgpeth JW (1985) Between pacific tides, 5th edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford (Revised by DW Phillips) Google Scholar
  81. Robertson A (1905) Non-incrusting chilostomatous Bryozoa of the west coast of North America. Univ Calif Publ Zool 2:235–322Google Scholar
  82. Ruesink JL (2007) Biotic resistance and facilitation of a non-native oyster on rocky shores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 331:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (2003) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  84. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED, Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent and consequences. Am Zool 37:621–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Steves B, Foss SF, Shiba S (2011) Marine invasion history and vector analysis of California: a hotspot for western North America. Divers Distrib 17:362–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ruiz GM, Freestone AL, Fofonoff PW, Simkanin C (2009) Habitat distribution and heterogeneity in marine invasion dynamics: the importance of hard substrate and artificial structure. In: Wahl M (ed) Marine hard bottom communities. Springer, Berlin, pp 321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ruiz GM, Rawlings TK, Dobbs FC, Drake LA, Mullady T, Huq A, Colwell RR (2000) Global spread of microorganisms by ships. Nature 408:49–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Russell LK, Hepburn CD, Hurd CL, Stuart MD (2008) The expanding range of Undaria pinnatifida in southern New Zealand: distribution, dispersal mechanisms and the invasion of wave-exposed environments. Biol Invasions 10:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sagarin RD, Barry JP, Gilman SE, Baxter CH (1999) Climate-related change in an intertidal community over short and long time scales. Ecol Monogr 69:465–490. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0465:crciai]2.0.co;2Google Scholar
  90. Sanchez I, Fernandez C (2006) Resource availability and invasibility in an intertidal macroalgal assemblage. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 313:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sanford E, Gaylord B, Hettinger A, Lenz EA, Meyer K, Hill TM (2014) Ocean acidification increases the vulnerability of native oysters to predation by invasive snails. Proc R Soc B 281:20132681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schultz ST, Goddard JHR, Gosliner TM, Mason DE, Pence WE, MacDonald GR, Pearse VB, Pearse JS (2011) Climate-index response profiling indicates larval transport is driving fluctuations in nudibranch gastropods from the northeast Pacific Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 56:749–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sellheim K, Stachowicz JJ, Coates RC (2010) Effects of a nonnative habitat-forming species on mobile and sessile epifaunal communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 398:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Shinen JS, Morgan SG, Chan AL (2009) Invasion resistance on rocky shores: direct and indirect effects of three native predators on an exotic and native prey species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 378:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Simkanin C, Davidson IC, Therriault TW, Jamieson G, Dower JF (2017) Manipulating propagule pressure to test the invasibility of subtidal marine habitats. Biol Invasions 19:1565–1575.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1379-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Simons RD, Page HM, Zaleski S, Miller R, Dugan JE, Schroeder DM, Doheny B (2016) The effects of anthropogenic structures on habitat connectivity and the potential spread of non-native invertebrate species in the offshore environment. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152261 Google Scholar
  97. Smith JR, Vogt SC, Creedon F, Lucas BJ, Eernisse DJ (2014) The non-native turf-forming alga Caulacanthus ustulatus displaces space-occupants but increases diversity. Biol Invasions 16:2195–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stachowicz JJ, Byrnes JE (2006) Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Steneck RS, Carlton JT (2001) Human alterations of marine communities: students beware! In: Bertness M, Gaines S, Hay M (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, pp 445–468Google Scholar
  101. Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, Tegner MJ (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ Conserv 29:436–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tamburello L, Bulleri F, Balata D, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2014) The role of overgrazing and anthropogenic disturbance in shaping spatial patterns of distribution of an invasive seaweed. J Appl Ecol 51:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Trimble AC, Ruesink JL, Dumbauld BR (2009) Factors preventing the recovery of a historically overexploited shellfish species, Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864. J Shellfish Res 28:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Veiga P, Torres AC, Rubal M, Troncoso J, Sousa-Pinto I (2014) The invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Ochrophyta) along the north coast of Portugal: distribution model versus field observations. Mar Pollut Bull 84:63–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Vieira LM, Spencer Jones M, Taylor PD (2014) The identity of the invasive fouling bryozoan Watersipora subtorquata (d’Orbigny) and some other congeneric species. Zootaxa 3857:151–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Vila M, Basnou C, Pysek P, Josefsson J, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Roques A, Roy D, Hylme PE, DAISIE partners (2010) How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Evol 8:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wasson KW, Fenn K, Pearse JS (2005) Habitat differences in marine invasions of central California. Biol Invasions 7:935–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wasson K, Zabin CJ, Bedinger L, Diaz C, Pearse J (2001) Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport. Biol Conserv 102:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Williams SL, Smith JE (2007) A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:327–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Yuan WS, Hoffman EA, Walters LJ (2016) Effects of nonnative invertebrates on two life stages of the native eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. Biol Invasions 18:689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zabin CJ, Ashton GV, Brown CW, Davidson IC, Sytsma MD (2014) Small boats provide connectivity for nonindigenous marine species between a highly invaded international port and nearby coastal harbors. Manag Biol Invasion 5:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zabin CJ, Ashton GV, Brown CW, Ruiz GM (2009) Northern range expansion of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) in western North America. Aquat Invasions 4:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zabin CJ, Danner EM, Baumgartner EP, Spafford D, Miller KA, Pearse JS (2013) A comparison of intertidal species richness and composition between Central California and Oahu, HI. Mar Ecol 34:131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterTiburonUSA
  2. 2.Monterey Bay National Marine SanctuaryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSanta CruzUSA
  3. 3.Hopkins Marine StationStanford UniversityPacific GroveUSA
  4. 4.Joseph M. Long Marine LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations