Self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in three ascidian species that differ in genetic dispersal potential
- 239 Downloads
Although self-fertilization can mitigate the costs of sexual reproduction, many hermaphroditic marine invertebrates avoid selfing, presumably because of inbreeding depression. Eventually, successive generations of inbreeding are expected to reduce genetic load, but selfing cannot evolve for future benefits. Initial inbreeding costs of selfing could be offset by the immediate benefits of local adaptation and mating assurance, both of which are more likely in species with limited gene flow. We compared the likelihood of selfing and the magnitude of inbreeding depression among three ascidian species (Molgula provisionalis, Ciona intestinalis, and Botryllus schlosseri) that were known a priori to differ in larval dispersal potential. Selfing potential exhibited a negative association, and inbreeding depression a positive association with dispersal potential. M. provisionalis, with highly philopatric larvae, had no apparent barrier to self-fertilization and exhibited little evidence of inbreeding depression (ratio of survival of self to outcross progeny 10 weeks after metamorphosis was 0.999). By contrast, C. intestinalis, with highly dispersive larvae, exhibited low levels of self-fertilization in flowing water and high levels of inbreeding depression (survival ratio 14 weeks after metamorphosis of 0.274). B. schlosseri larvae have intermediate dispersal capabilities, yet exhibited low likelihood of self-fertilization and high magnitude of inbreeding depression (survival ratio 10 weeks after metamorphosis of 0.310); however, extremely long-lived sperm contribute to gene flow in B. schlosseri. These results suggest that in marine hermaphrodites, gene flow, self-fertilization, and inbreeding depression should be evaluated as an integrated suite of traits, not independent characters.
We thank Sheri Johnson, Basma Mohammad, and Beth Ann Choate for laboratory assistance and the National Science Foundation (OCE-01-17623 and OCE-14-58188) for funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was funded by National Science Foundation (OCE-01-17623 and OCE-14-58188).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Berrill NJ (1950) The Tunicata. Bernard Quaritch, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Carlon DB (1999) The evolution of mating systems in tropical reef corals. Trends Ecol Evol 12:17–21Google Scholar
- Ghiselin MT (1987) Evolutionary aspects of marine invertebrate reproduction. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS, Pearse VB (eds) Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, vol 9, General aspects: seeking unity in diversity. Blackwell Scientific Publications/The Boxwood Press, Palo Alto/Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
- Givinish TJ (2010) Ecology of plant speciation. Taxon 59:1326–1366Google Scholar
- Knowlton N, Jackson JBC (1993) Inbreeding and outbreeding in marine invertebrates. In: Thornhill NW (ed) The Natural History of inbreeding and Outbreeding. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd DG (1980) Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms. In: Solbrig OT (ed) Demography and evolution in plant populations. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Maynard Smith J (1971) The origin and maintenance of sex. In: Williams GC (ed) Group selection. Aldine Atherton, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Millar RH (1953) Ciona. The University Press, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
- Phillippi A (2005) A comparative study of self-fertilization in the life histories of three ascidian species with contrasting dispersal patterns. PhD Thesis, University of Maine, OronoGoogle Scholar
- Selander RK, Ochman H (1983) The genetic structure of populations as illustrated by molluscs. Curr Top Biol Med Res 10:93–123Google Scholar
- Shields WM (1982) Philopatry, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Shields WM (1987) Dispersal and mating systems: investigating their causal connections. In: Chepko-Sade BD, Halpin ZT (eds) Mammalian dispersal patterns: the effects of social structure on population genetics. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Templeton AR (1986) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- van Name WG (1945) The North and South American Ascidians. American Museum of Natural History, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vrijenhoek RC, Graven MA (1992) Population genetics of Egyptian Biomphalaria alexandrina (Gastropoda, Planorbidae). J Heredity 83:255–261Google Scholar
- Wright S (1977) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol 3. Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar