Plankton supports the majority of fish biomass on temperate rocky reefs
- 501 Downloads
Coastal temperate rocky reefs are economically valuable and highly diverse, yet the trophodynamics of these productive systems are understudied. Quantifying the trophic linkages that support fish assemblages on these reefs is valuable for understanding how these assemblages may change due to changes in benthic and pelagic primary production. The goal of this study was to quantify the relative importance of primary sources of nutrition (here, macroalgae, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and detritus) for supporting fish assemblages on shallow rocky reefs. We constructed a general food web that traces the food sources supporting fish biomass on shallow temperate reefs near Sydney, Australia, using species composition data from 17 reefs based on field sampling and the Reef Life Survey (reeflifesurvey.com), and combined this with dietary information sourced from field collections and published literature. Planktivorous fish typically dominated reef fish assemblages, comprising an average of 41% of the total fish biomass (ranging from 12 to 71% among sites). Our food web analysis showed that, on average, 56% (±5% s.e.) of the total fish biomass was ultimately supported by phytoplankton (and 53% from zooplankton), in comparison to 31% (±4%) supported by macroalgae and 12% (±2%) by detritus. This result highlights the dominance of zooplanktivorous fish on temperate reefs and also their importance as prey for piscivores. Our findings demonstrate the importance of understanding the coastal dynamics of plankton and planktivory for predicting the response of temperate reefs and their fish assemblages to a changing climate.
KeywordsMacroalgae Fish Assemblage Reef Fish Trophic Group Fish Biomass
The authors recognise the data shared by the Reef Life Survey (reeflifesurvey.com). This article is Sydney Institute of Marine Science Contribution #202.
Compliance with ethical standards
This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project (Grant Number LP120100592).
Conflict of interest
All authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was done under the University of NSW Animal Care and Ethics Committee (ACEC) approval #10/15B.
- Barrett NS et al. (2014) Adaptive management of temperate reefs to minimise effects of climate change: developing new effective approaches for ecological monitoring and predictive modelling. University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Report for the Fisheries Research and Development CorporationGoogle Scholar
- Bulman C, Condie S, Furlani D, Cahill M, Klaer N, Goldsworthy S, Knuckey I (2006) Trophic dynamics of the eastern shelf and slope of the South East Fishery: impacts of and on the fishery. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Report for the Fisheries Research and Development CorporationGoogle Scholar
- Burchmore JJ, Pollard DA, Bell JD, Middleton MJ, Pease BC, Matthews J (1985) An ecological comparison of artificial and natural rocky reef fish communities in Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. Bull Mar Sci 37:70–85Google Scholar
- Connell SD (2007) Subtidal Temperate Rocky Habitats: Habitat Heterogeneity at Local to Continental Scales. In: Connell SD, Gillanders BM (eds) Marine Ecology. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 378–401Google Scholar
- Forrest RE (2008) Simulation models for estimating productivity and trade-offs in the data limited fisheries of New South Wales, Australia. The University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
- Frederich B, Fabri G, Lepoint G, Vandewalle P, Parmentier E (2009) Trophic niches of thirteen damselfishes (Pomacentridae) at the Grand Récif of Toliara, Madagascar. Ichthyol Res 56:10–17Google Scholar
- Hamner WM, Jones MS, Carleton JH, Hauri IR, Williams DM (1988) Zooplankton, planktivorous fish, and water currents on a windward reef face: Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Bull Mar Sci 42:459–479Google Scholar
- Opitz S (1996) Trophic Interactions in Caribbean Reefs. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources ManagementGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Sheaves M, Baker R, Abrantes KG, Connolly RM (2016) Fish biomass in tropical estuaries: substantial variation in food web structure, sources of nutrition and ecosystem-supporting processes. Estuaries Coasts 1–14Google Scholar
- Weaver DC, Dennis GD, Sulak KJ (2002) Northeastern Gulf of Mexico and Marine Ecosystem Program: Community Structure and Trophic Ecology of Dermersal Fishes on the Pinnacles Reef Tract. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey USGS, and Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, Biological Sciences Report USGS BSR 2001-0008 OCS Study MMS 2002-034Google Scholar
- Young JW et al. (2015) The trophodynamics of marine top predators: Current knowledge, recent advances and challenges. Deep-Sea Res Pt II(113):170–187Google Scholar