Marine Biology

, Volume 162, Issue 3, pp 649–660 | Cite as

Foraging by experienced and inexperienced Cory’s shearwater along a 3-year period of ameliorating foraging conditions

  • Fredrik D. Haug
  • Vítor H. PaivaEmail author
  • Antje C. Werner
  • Jaime A. Ramos
Original Paper


Experience is believed to be an important factor determining the foraging success of animals, but there is limited knowledge on how foraging tactics differ among individuals, and on how individuals develop efficient foraging strategies. Pelagic seabirds are some of the longest living organisms, and in several species, breeding is deferred far beyond their physical maturity. The complex foraging skills needed to successfully rear a young is considered the most likely explanation for this life trait, making seabirds particularly interesting for the investigation of how foraging skills differ and develop through their life span. In our study, the spatial distribution and foraging tactics of experienced and inexperienced males of a Procellariiform seabird species, the Cory’s shearwater (Calonectris borealis) breeding on the Portuguese continental shelf, were compared along three consecutive breeding seasons with ameliorating environmental conditions (from 2010 towards 2012). Kernel overlaps of foraging areas and habitat modelling demonstrated that while experienced males showed high fidelity to shallow feeding grounds, inexperienced birds were more explorative and relied more on less-productive pelagic areas. Our results seem to support the prediction that differences between experienced and inexperienced individuals are enhanced by food scarcity. In fact, there was a higher spatial, trophic and behavioural segregation between both groups when environmental conditions were poor, which progressively diminished with improving environmental conditions. Still, we cannot rule out the fact that inexperienced birds might be gaining experience with each breeding season and thus honing their foraging skills towards those of experienced individuals.


Home Range North Atlantic Oscillation Index Experienced Male Trophic Ecology Isotopic Niche 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank the Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e Florestas (ICNF) for their logistical support (lodging), especially the wardens of the Reserva Natural das Berlengas, Paulo Crisóstomo and Eduardo Mourato, for their companionship. Also a special thanks to Filipe Ceia and Margarida Soares for their help during fieldwork. GPS loggers were financed by the EU INTERREG project FAME: The Future of the Atlantic Marine Environment. F.D.H. acknowledges the study grant given by the EMMC-EMAE consortium and the European Commission. V.H.P. acknowledges the postdoctoral grants given by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT; SFRH/BPD/63825/2009 and SFRH/BPD/85024/2012). The experimental approach was conducted with permission from the Portuguese Government (ICNF). All methods used in this study comply with the current laws of Portugal.


  1. Afán I, Navarro J, Cardador L, Ramírez F, Kato A, Rodríguez B, Ropert-Coudert Y, Forero MG (2014) Foraging movements and habitat niche of two closely related seabirds breeding in sympatry. Mar Biol 161:657–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åkesson S, Weimerskirch H (2014) Evidence for sex-segregated ocean distributions first-winter wandering albatrosses at Crozet Islands. PLoS One 9(2):e86779Google Scholar
  3. Ashmole NP (1963) The regulation of numbers of tropical oceanic birds. Ibis 103b:458–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bearhop S, Phillips R, McGill R, Cherel Y, Dawson D, Croxall J (2006) Stable isotopes indicate sex-specific and long-term individual foraging specialisation in diving seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bicknell A, Oro D, Camphuysen K (2013) Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities. J Appl Ecol 50:649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunce A, Ward SJ, Norman FI (2005) Are age-related variations in breeding performance greatest when food availability is limited? J Zool 266:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calenge C, Darmon G, Basille M, Loison A, Jullien J-M (2008) The factorial decomposition of the Mahalanobis distances in habitat selection studies. Ecology 89:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceia FR, Phillips RA, Ramos JA, Cherel Y, Vieira RP, Richard P, Xavier JC (2012) Short- and long-term consistency in the foraging niche of wandering albatrosses. Mar Biol 159:1581–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceia FR, Paiva VH, Fidalgo V, Morais L, Beata A, Crisóstomo P, Mourato E, Garthe S, Marques JC, Ramos JA (2014) Annual and seasonal consistency in the feeding ecology of an opportunistic species, the yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 497:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherel Y, Hobson KA, Hassani S (2005a) Isotopic discrimination between food and blood and feathers of captive penguins: implications for dietary studies in the wild. Physiol Biochem Zool 78:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherel Y, Hobson KA, Weimerskirch H (2005b) Using stable isotopes to study resource acquisition and allocation in procellariform seabirds. Oecologia 145:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH, Stevenson IR, Marrow P, MacColl AD, Houston AI, McNamara JM (1996) Population fluctuations, reproductive costs and life-history tactics in female Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 65:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curio E (1983) Why do young birds reproduce less well? Ibis 125:400–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daunt F, Wanless S, Harris MP, Money L, Monaghan P (2007) Older and wiser: improvements in breeding success are linked to better foraging performance in European shags. Funct Ecol 21:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forslund P, Pärt T (1995) Age and reproduction in birds—hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol 10:364–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaillard JM, Yoccoz NG (2003) Temporal variation in survival of mammals: a case of environmental canalization? Ecology 84:3294–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granadeiro JP (1993) Variation in measurements of Cory’s shearwater between populations and sexing by discriminant analysis. Ring Migr 14:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grémillet D, Omo GD, Ryan PG, Peters G, Ropert-Coudert Y, Weeks SJ (2004) Offshore diplomacy, or how seabirds mitigate intra-specific competition : a case study based on GPS tracking of Cape gannets from neighbouring colonies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guilford TC, Meade J, Freeman R, Biro D, Evans T, Bonadonna F, Boyle D, Roberts S, Perrins CM (2008) GPS tracking of the foraging movements of Manx Shearwaters Puffinus puffinus breeding on Skomer Island, Wales. Ibis 150:462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gutowsky SE, Tremblay Y, Kappes MA, Flint EN, Klavitter J, Laniawe L, Shaffer SA (2014) Divergent post-breeding distribution and habitat associations of fledgling and adult Black-footed Albatrosses Phoebastria nigripes in the North Pacific. Ibis 156:60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurrell JW (1995) Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Igual JM, Forero MG, Tavecchia G, González-Solís J et al (2005) Short-term effects of data-loggers on Cory’s shearwater (Calonectris diomedea). Mar Biol 146:619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inger R, Bearhop S (2008) Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis 150:447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol 80:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (2002) Interactive effects of parental age and environmental variation on the breeding performance of Tengmalm’s owl. J Anim Ecol 71:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Vaillant M, Le Bohec C, Prud’Homme O, Wienecke B, Le Maho Y, Kato A, Ropert-Coudert Y (2013) How age and sex drive the foraging behaviour in the king penguin. Mar Biol 160:1147–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lecoq M, Catry P, Granadeiro JP (2011) Population trends of Cory’s shearwaters Calonectris diomedea borealis breeding at Berlengas Islands, Portugal. Airo 20:36–41Google Scholar
  29. Louzao M, Hyrenbach KD, Abelló P, de Sola LG, Oro D (2006) Oceanographic habitat of an endangered Mediterranean procellariform: implications for marine protected areas. Ecol Appl 16:1683–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Louzao M, Delord K, García D, Boué A, Weimerskirch H (2012) Protecting persistent dynamic oceanographic features: transboundary conservation efforts are needed for the critically endangered balearic shearwater. PLoS One 7:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLean AAE (1986) Age-specific foraging ability and the evolution of deferred breeding in three species of gulls. Wilson Bull 98:267–279Google Scholar
  32. Mougin J-L, Jouanin C, Roux F (2000) Démographie du puffin cendré Calonectris diomedea de Selvagem Grande. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 55:275–290Google Scholar
  33. Navarro J, Oro D, Bertolero A, Genovart M, Delgado A, Forero MG (2010) Age and sexual differences in the exploitation of two anthropogenic food resources for an opportunistic seabird. Mar Biol 157:2453–2459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nevoux M, Weimerskirch H, Barbraud C (2007) Environmental variation and experience-related differences in the demography of the long-lived black-browed albatross. J Anim Ecol 76:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nol E, Smith JNM (1987) Effects of age and breeding experience on seasonal reproductive success in the song sparrow. J Anim Ecol 56:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborn TJ (2011) Winter 2009/2010 temperatures and a record-breaking North Atlantic Oscillation index. Weather 66:19–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paiva VH, Geraldes P, Ramírez I, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2010a) How area restricted search of a pelagic seabird changes while performing a dual foraging strategy. Oikos 119:1423–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paiva VH, Geraldes P, Ramírez I, Meirinho A, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2010b) Oceanographic characteristics of areas used by Cory’s shearwaters during short and long foraging trips in the North Atlantic. Mar Biol 157:1385–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paiva VH, Xavier JC, Geraldes P, Ramírez I, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2010c) Foraging ecology of Cory’s shearwaters in different oceanic environments of the North Atlantic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 410:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paiva VH, Geraldes P, Ramírez I, Werner AC, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2013a) Overcoming difficult times: the behavioural resilience of a marine predator when facing environmental stochasticity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 486:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paiva VH, Geraldes P, Marques V, Rodrígues R, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2013b) Environmental variability affecting the distribution and abundance of different trophic levels of the North Atlantic food web. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 477:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pardo D, Barbraud C, Authier M, Weimerskirch H (2013) Evidence for an age-dependent influence of environmental variations on a long-lived seabird’s life-history traits. Ecology 94:208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS One 5:e9672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pärt T (2001) The effects of territory quality on age-dependent reproductive performance in the northern wheatear, Oenanthe oenanthe. Anim Behav 62:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Péron C, Grémillet D (2013) Tracking through life stages: adult, immature and juvenile autumn migration in a long-lived seabird. PLoS One 8:e72713Google Scholar
  46. Phillips RA, Xavier JC, Croxall JP (2003) Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. Auk 120:1082–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phillips RA, Bearhop S, McGill RAR, Dawson DA (2009) Stable isotopes reveal individual variation in migration strategies and habitat preferences in a suite of seabirds during the nonbreeding period. Oecologia 160:795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pütz K, Cherel Y (2005) The diving behaviour of brooding king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) from the Falkland Islands: variation in dive profiles and synchronous underwater swimming provide new insights into their foraging strategies. Mar Biol 147:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riotte-Lambert L, Weimerskirch H (2013) Do naive juvenile seabirds forage differently from adults? Proc R Soc B 280:20131434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts JJ, Best BD, Dunn DC, Treml EA, Halpin PN (2010) Marine geospatial ecology tools: an integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++. Environ Model Soft 25:1197–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santos AMP, Chícharo A, Dos Santos A, Moita T, Oliveira PB, Peliz Á, Ré P (2007) Physical–biological interactions in the life history of small pelagic fish in the Western Iberia Upwelling Ecosystem. Prog Oceanogr 74:192–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith JNM (1981) Does high fecundity reduce survival in song sparrows? Evolution 35:1142–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steiner I, Bürgi C, Werffeli S, Dell’Omo G, Valenti P, Tröster G, Wolfer DP, Lipp H-P (2000) A GPS logger and software for analysis of homing in pigeons and small mammals. Physiol Behav 71:589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Mysterud A et al (2003) Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niño Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc R Soc B 270:2087–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suryan R, Santora J, Sydeman W (2012) New approach for using remotely sensed chlorophyll a to identify seabird hotspots. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 451:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sydeman WJ, Penniman JF, Penniman TM, Pyle P, Ainley DG (1991) Breeding performance in the Western gull—effects of parental age, timing of breeding and year in relation to food availability. J Anim Ecol 60:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  58. Thiebot JB, Lescroël A, Pinaud D, Trathan PN, Bost C-A (2011) Larger foraging range but similar habitat selection in non-breeding versus breeding sub-Antarctic penguins. Antarct Sci 23:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsoar A, Allouche O, Steinitz O, Rotem D, Kadmon R (2007) A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. Divers Distrib 13:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Votier SC, Grecian WJ, Patrick S, Newton J (2011) Inter-colony movements, at-sea behaviour and foraging in an immature seabird: results from GPS-PPT tracking, radio-tracking and stable isotope analysis. Mar Biol 158:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Warham J (1990) The petrels: their ecology and breeding systems. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Weimerskirch H (1992) Reproductive effort in long-lived birds: age-specific patterns of condition, reproduction and survival in the wandering albatross. Oikos 64:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weimerskirch H, Gault A, Cherel Y (2005) Prey distribution and patchiness: factors in foraging success and efficiency of Wandering Albatrosses. Ecology 86:2611–2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Werner AC, Paiva VH, Ramos JA (2014) On the “real estate market”, individual quality and the foraging ecology of male Cory’s shearwaters. Auk 131:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zimmer I, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Ancel A, Chiaradia A (2011) Does foraging performance change with age in female little penguins (Eudyptula minor)? PLoS One 6(1):e16098CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fredrik D. Haug
    • 1
  • Vítor H. Paiva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antje C. Werner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jaime A. Ramos
    • 1
  1. 1.MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e TecnologiaUniversidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Ornitología, Museo de Historia Natural “Javier Prado”Universidad Nacional Mayor de San MarcosLima 14Peru

Personalised recommendations