Skip to main content
Log in

Shell-boring versus tube-dwelling: is the mode of life fixed or flexible? Two cases in spionid polychaetes (Annelida, Spionidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Free crawling was an original life style, and the ability to build tubes and bore into shells evolved independently in various annelids and more than once within the family Spionidae. Absence of morphological differences between the shell-boring (SB) and tube-dwelling (TD) spionid worms and the innate ability of borers to build tubes raised a question whether the mode of life is fixed or flexible. Sequence data of three gene fragments of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA and nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA (in total 1,677 bp) have shown that SB and TD individuals of Dipolydora carunculata from the Sea of Japan were genetically identical, whereas those of Polydora triglanda from Taiwan were genetically distant and not conspecific. These data indicate that some species are constrained to a certain mode of life, while others are flexible and individuals can be either SB or TD depending on the place of settlement in the end of their larval development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blake JA (1969) Systematics and ecology of shell-boring polychaetes from New England. Am Zool 9:813–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JA (1996) Family Spionidae Grube, 1850. Including a review of the genera and species from California and a revision of the genus Polydora Bosc, 1802. In: Blake JA, Hilbig B, Scott PH (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the Benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel, vol 6., The Annelida Part 3-Polychaeta: Orbiniidae to CossuridaeSanta Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, pp 81–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JA, Evans JW (1973) Polydora and related genera as borers in mollusk shells and other calcareous substrates (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Veliger 15:235–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris S, Peel JS (2008) The earliest annelids: lower Cambrian polychaetes from the Sirius Passet Lagerstätte, Peary Land, North Greenland. Acta Palaeontol Pol 53:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsett DA (1961) The behavior of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.). Tube-building and burrowing. J Mar Biol Ass UK 41:577–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giribet G, Carranza S, Baguna J, Riutort M, Ribera C (1996) First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade. Mol Biol Evol 13:76–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel C (1957) Über den Röhrenbau und die Nahrungsaufnahme einiger Spioniden (Polychaeta sedentaria) der deutschen Küsten. Helgoländer wiss Meeresunters 6:100–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones ML (1969) Boring of shell by Caobangia in freshwater snails of Southeast Asia. Am Zool 9:829–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessing B, Croom H, Martin A, McIntosh C, Owen McMillian W (1989) The simple fool’s guide to PCR. University of Hawai, Hololulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamy E, André M (1937) Annélides perforant les coquilles de mollusques. Compt Rend XII Cong intern Zool, Lisbonne 1935—Sec. V 2:946–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauckner G (1980) Diseases of Mollusca: Gastropoda. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, vol I. Wiley, Chichester, pp 311–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauckner G (1983) Diseases of Mollusca: Bivalvia. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, vol II. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, pp 477–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Le HLV, Lecointre G, Perasso R (1993) A 28S rRNA based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphological based cladograms. Mol Phylogenet Evol 14:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGeachy JK, Stearn CW (1976) Boring by macro-organisms in the coral Montastrea annularis on Barbados reefs. Int Revue ges Hydrobiol 61:715–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakhov VV (2004) New ideas on the origin of bilateral animals. Rus J Mar Biol 30:335–346 In Russian with English Summary

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchenko GP, Radashevsky VI (2002) Genetic differences between two sibling sympatric Dipolydora species (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from the Sea of Japan, and a new species description. J Mar Biol Ass UK 82:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh WC (1868) On the boring of certain annelids. Ann Mag Nat Hist, Ser 4(2):276–295

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh WC (1908) The perforations of marine animals. Zoologist (London) 12:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radashevsky VI (1993) Revision of the genus Polydora and related genera from the North West Pacific (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Publs Seto Mar Biol Lab 36:1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Radashevsky VI (2012) Spionidae (Annelida) from shallow waters around the British Islands: an identification guide for the NMBAQC scheme with an overview of spionid morphology and biology. Zootaxa 3152:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Radashevsky VI, Hsieh HL (2000) Polydora (Polychaeta: Spionidae) species from Taiwan. Zool Stud 39:203–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Radashevsky VI, Olivares C (2005) Polydora uncinata (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in Chile: an accidental transportation across the Pacific. Biol Invasions 7:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radashevsky VI, Lana PC, Nalesso RC (2006) Morphology and biology of Polydora species (Polychaeta: Spionidae) boring into oyster shells in South America, with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 1353:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse GW, Pleijel F (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato-Okoshi W, Abe H (2012) Morphological and molecular sequence analysis of the harmful shell boring species of Polydora (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from Japan and Australia. Aquaculture 368–369:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon CA, Ludford A, Wynne S (2006) Spionid polychaetes infesting cultured abalone, Haliotis midae, in South Africa. African J Mar Sci 28:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon CA, Thornhill DJ, Oyarzun F, Halanych KM (2009) Genetic similarity between Boccardia proboscidea from Western North America and cultured abalone, Haliotis midae, in South Africa. Aquaculture 294:18–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Struck TH (2011) Direction of evolution within Annelida and the definition of Pleistoannelida. J Zool Syst Evol Res 49:340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zottoli RA, Carriker MR (1974) Burrow morphology, tube formation, and microarchitecture of shell dissolution by the spionid polychaete Polydora websteri. Mar Biol 27:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our sincere thanks are to Dr. Hwey-Lian Hsieh for providing generous support and conditions for collecting polychaetes in Taiwan, to Dr. John W. Chapman and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and edits on the manuscript, and to Alexander A. Omelyanenko for photographing scallop perforated by polychaetes. Financial support was provided by the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 94-2621-B-001-014) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project 05-04-90589) through the Taiwan–Russian Joint Research Cooperative Programme (Joint Research Project 94WIA0100036; Contract RP05B11), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project 12-04-00609) through the A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, and the Government of the Russian Federation (Project 11.G34.31.0010) through the Far Eastern Federal University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasily I. Radashevsky.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Uthicke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radashevsky, V.I., Pankova, V.V. Shell-boring versus tube-dwelling: is the mode of life fixed or flexible? Two cases in spionid polychaetes (Annelida, Spionidae). Mar Biol 160, 1619–1624 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2214-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2214-8

Keywords

Navigation