Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 160, Issue 3, pp 691–702 | Cite as

Relationship between the growth and survival of larval Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis

  • Keisuke SatohEmail author
  • Yosuke Tanaka
  • Masachika Masujima
  • Makoto Okazaki
  • Yoshiki Kato
  • Hiroshi Shono
  • Kentaro Suzuki
Original Paper

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that a large body size and rapid growth rate affect the survival of larval Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis (PBT), and analyzed larval growth in relation to environmental conditions. Seven high density larval patches of PBT were tracked with reference buoys in the northwestern Pacific Ocean for 28–171 h in May–June from 2004 to 2008. The otolith radii and daily growth rates of the survivor larvae (collected on later tracking days of each tracking session) tended to be larger and more rapid, respectively, than those of original larvae (collected on earlier tracking days). A large body size was found to positively affect the survival of larval PBT, as did a rapid growth rate, even at an early larval stage (7 days after hatching). Generalized linear modeling showed that the otolith radius was influenced positively by the sea temperature, stratification parameter and food density, while the growth rate was influenced positively by the sea temperature and food density.

Keywords

Standard Length Larval Growth Large Body Size Food Density Rapid Growth Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We especially thank Captain Y. Terada (in 2008), former Captain M. Onoda (2004–2007) and the crew of the “Shunyo-Maru” for their suggestions and constant support. We appreciate the support given on deck by K. Hiramoto, N. Chow, K. Hoshino, M. Yamada, K. Murai, K. Korenaga, T. Urushizaka, E. Asakawa, M. Tanikawa, K. Nishimura and M. Suda. We are grateful to K. Hoshino, M. Suda, S. Nara, H. Asai, Y. Takahashi and M. Tanikawa for their help in sorting and identifying ichthyoplankton species. We also thank Z. Suzuki, M. Miyabe, H. Honda, H. Okamoto and M. Ogura for encouraging us to conduct this study.

Supplementary material

227_2012_2124_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 9 kb)
227_2012_2124_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 14 kb)

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Allain G, Petitgas P, Lazure P, Grellie P (2007) Biophysical modeling of larval drift, growth and survival for the prediction of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) recruitment in the Bay of Biscay (NE Atlantic). Fish Oceanogr 16:489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaugrand G, Brander KM, Lindley JA, Souissi S, Reid PC (2003) Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea. Nature 426:661–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers RC, Miller TJ (1995) Evaluating fish growth by means of otolith increment analysis: special properties of individual-level longitudinal data. In: Secor DH, Dean JM, Campana SE (eds) Recent Developments in Otolith Research. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 155–175Google Scholar
  5. Chihara M, Murano M (1997) An illustrated guide to marine plankton in Japan. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 1–1568 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Cury P, Roy C (1989) Optimal environmental window and pelagic fish recruitment success in upwelling areas. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cushing DH, Horwood JW (1994) The growth and death of fish larvae. J Plankton Res 16:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dower JF, Pepin P, Leggett WC (2002) Using patch studies to link mesoscale patterns of feeding and growth in larval fish to environmental variability. Fish Oceanogr 11:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dower JF, Pepin P, Kim GC (2009) Covariation in feeding success, size-at-age and growth in larval radiated shanny (Ulvaria subbifurcata): insights based on individuals. J Plankton Res 31:235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fontes J, Santos RS, Afonso P, Caselle JE (2011) Larval growth, size, stage duration and recruitment success of a temperate reef fish. J Sea Res 6:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortier L, Quinonez-Velazquez C (1998) Dependence of survival on growth in larval pollock Pollachius virens and haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus: a field study based on individual hatchdates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 174:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Francis RICC (1990) Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review. J Fish Biol 36:883–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis MP (1993) Does water temperature determine year class strength in New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus, Sparidae). Fish Oceanogr 2:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuiman LA, Rose KA, Cowan JH, Smith EP (2006) Survival skills required for predator evasion by fish larvae and their relation to laboratory measures of performance. Anim Behav 71:1389–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harding D, Nichols JH, Tungate DS (1978) The spawning of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) in the southern North Sea and England Channel. Rapp p-v Reun Cons Int Explor Mer 172:102–113Google Scholar
  16. Hare JA, Cowen RK (1997) Size, growth, development, and survival of the planktonic larvae of Pomatomus saltatrix (Pisces: pomatomidae). Ecology 78:2415–2431Google Scholar
  17. Heath MR (1992) Field investigations of the early life stages of marine fish. Adv Mar Biol 28:1–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Houde ED (1989) Comparative growth, mortality, and energetic of marine larvae: temperature and implied latitudinal effects. Fish Bull 87:471–495Google Scholar
  19. Houde ED (2008) Emerging from Hjort’s shadow. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 41:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houde ED (2009) Recruitment variability. In: Jakobsen T, Fogarty MJ, Megrey BA, Mokness E (eds) Fish reproductive biology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 91–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houde ED, Zastrow CE (1993) Ecosystem- and taxon-specific dynamic and energetics properties of larval fish assemblages. Bull Mar Sci 53:290–335Google Scholar
  22. Itoh T, Shiina Y, Tsuji S, Endo F, Tezuka N (2000) Otolith daily increment formation in laboratory reared larval and juvenile bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus. Fish Sci 66:834–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins GP, Young JW, Davis TLO (1991) Density dependence of larval growth of a marine fish, the southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1358–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaji T, Tanaka M, Takahashi Y, Oka M, Ishibashi N (1996) Preliminary observations on development of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus (Scombridae) larvae reared in the laboratory, with special reference to the digestive system. Mar Freshw Res 47:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lasker R (1975) Field criteria for survival of anchovy larvae: the relation between inshore chlorophyll maximum layers and successful first feeding. Fish Bull 73:453–462Google Scholar
  26. Lasker R (1978) The relation between oceanographic conditions, and larval anchovy food in the California Current: identification of factors contributing to recruitment failure. Rapp P-v Reun Cons Int Explor Mer 173:212–230Google Scholar
  27. Lee O, Nash RDM, Danilowicz BS (2005) Small-scale spatio-temporal variability in ichthyoplankton and zooplankton distribution in relation to a tidal-mixing front in the Irish Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1021–1036Google Scholar
  28. Litvak MK, Leggett WC (1992) Age and size-selective predation on larval fishes: the bigger-is-better hypothesis revisited. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 81:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meekan MG, Fortier L (1996) Selection for fast growth during the larval life of Atlantic cod Gadus morpha on the Scotian shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 137:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meekan MG, Vigliola L, Hansen A, Doherty PJ, Halford A, Carleton JH (2006) Bigger is better: size-selective mortality throughout the life history of a fast-growing clupeid, Spratelloides gracilis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 317:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miyashita S (2002) Studies on the seedling production of the Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus orientalis. Bull Fish Lab Kinki Univ 8:1–171Google Scholar
  32. Nielsen R, Munk P (2004) Diel vertical migrations of juvenile fish: an obligate or facultative process? Adv Mar Biol 26:115–168Google Scholar
  33. Nishikawa Y (1985) Identification for larvae of three species of genus Thunnus by melanophore patterns. Bull Far Seas Fish Res Lab 22:119–129Google Scholar
  34. Okiyama M (1974) Occurrence of the postlarvae of bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus, in the Japan Sea. Bull Jpn Sea Natl Fish Res Inst 25:89–97Google Scholar
  35. Pepin P, Shears TH, Lafontaine Y (1992) Significance of body size to the interaction between a larval fish (Mallotus villosus) and a vertebrate predator (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 81:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Satoh K (2010) Horizontal and vertical distribution of larvae of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis in patches entrained in mesoscale eddies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 404:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Satoh K, Tanaka Y, Iwahashi M (2008) Variations in the instantaneous mortality rate between larval patches of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Fish Res 89:248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simpson JH, Edelsten DJ, Edwards A, Morris NCG, Tett PB (1979) The Islay front: physical structure and phytoplankton distribution. Est Coast Mar Sci 9:713–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sponaugle Su, Walter KD, Denit KL, Llopiz JK, Cowen RK (2010) Variation in pelagic larval growth of Atlantic billfishes: the role of prey composition and selective mortality. Mar Biol 157:839–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takasuka A, Aoki I, Mitani I (2003) Evidence of growth-selective predation on larval Japanese anchovy Engraulis japonicus in Sagami Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takasuka A, Oozeki Y, Kimura R, Kubota H, Aoki I (2004) Growth-selective predation hypothesis revisited for larval anchovy in offshore waters: cannibalism by juveniles versus predation by skipjack tunas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 278:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanaka Y, Satoh K, Iwahashi M, Yamada H (2006) Growth-dependent recruitment of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 319:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanaka Y, Satoh K, Yamada H, Takebe T, Nikaido H, Shiozawa S (2008) Assessment of the nutritional status of field-caught larval Pacific bluefin tuna by RNA/DNA ratio based on a starvation experiment of hatchery-reared fish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 354:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taniguchi A (1977) Distribution of microzooplankton in the Philippine Sea and the Celebes Sea in summer, 1972. J Oceanogr Soc Japan 33:82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uotani I, Saito T, Hiranuma K, Nishikawa Y (1990) Feeding habit of bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus larvae in the western North Pacific Ocean. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 56:713–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wuenschel MJ, Werner RG (2004) Consumption and gut evacuation rate of laboratory-reared spotted seatrout (Sciaenidae) larvae and juveniles. J Fish Biol 65:723–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yabe H, Ueyanagi S, Watanabe H (1966) Studies on the early life history of bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus and on the larvae of the southern bluefin tuna T. maccoyii. Rep Nankai Reg Fish Res Lab 23:95–129Google Scholar
  48. Yamada H, Takagi N, Nishimura D (2006) Recruitment abundance index of Pacific bluefin tuna using fisheries data on juveniles. Fish Sci 72:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keisuke Satoh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yosuke Tanaka
    • 2
  • Masachika Masujima
    • 3
  • Makoto Okazaki
    • 3
  • Yoshiki Kato
    • 4
  • Hiroshi Shono
    • 5
  • Kentaro Suzuki
    • 6
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Far Seas FisheriesShizuokaJapan
  2. 2.Amami StationNational Center for Stock EnhancementOhshimaJapan
  3. 3.National Research Institute of Fisheries ScienceYokohamaJapan
  4. 4.National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries Yokohama OfficeYokohamaJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of FisheriesKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan
  6. 6.Institute of Environmental EcologyIDEA Consultants, Inc.ShidaJapan

Personalised recommendations