Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bottlenose dolphins and aquaculture: interaction and site fidelity on the north-eastern coast of Sardinia (Italy)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Owing to the worldwide growth of aquaculture over the last years, new habitats have been created through the supplement of nutrients. This addition of nutrients affects the whole marine food web, resulting in predator species such as bottlenose dolphins becoming attracted to these areas. During this 5-year-long study that was carried out along the north-eastern coast of Sardinia (Italy), bottlenose dolphin’s history of exposure to aquaculture perturbations and their effects was documented. The interaction with a fish farm was assessed by studying the site fidelity, group dynamics, and seasonal and yearly occurrence. In all, 1,838 hours were spent in the field. Behavioural observations showed that the predominant activity (89 % of the time) in the fish farm was foraging (predation and depredation). The occurrence of bottlenose dolphins appeared to be related with the seasons and with the fish farm harvesting operations. Thus, the peak dolphin occurrence in the fish farm area throughout Fall coincides with the period in which they spend most of their time foraging. A relatively small community remained resident interacting with the fish farm over a long period of time. Hence, these individuals gained intimate knowledge on how to capitalize on the fish farm industry. This heterogeneity in site fidelity and residence patterns is highly relevant when coastal management initiatives are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bearzi G, Fortuna CM, Reeves RR (2008) Ecology and conservation of common bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in the Mediterranean Sea. Mammal Review 39(2):92–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge M (1996) Cage aquaculture, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science Ltd, Fishing News Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Black KD (2001) Environmental impacts of aquaculture. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Carss DN (1990) Concentrations of wild and escaped fishes immediately adjacent to fish farm cages. Aquaculture 90(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carss DN (1994) Killing of piscivorous birds at Scottish fish farms, 1984–87. Biol Conserv 68(2):181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole R (2002) Impacts of marine farming on wild fish populations. Final research report for ministry of fisheries research project ENV2000/08. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand

  • Connor RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000) The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission-fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor R, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 91–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor RC, Smolker R, Bejder L (2006) Synchrony, social behaviour and alliance affiliation in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus. Anim Behav 72:1371–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster T, Sanchez-Jerez P, Bayle-Sempere J, Kingsford M (2004) Extensive aggregations of wild fish at coastal sea-cage fish farms. Hydrobiologia 525:245–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B (2006a) Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) predation on a marine fin fish farm: some underwater observations. Aquat Mamm 32:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B (2006b) Interactions between Mediterranean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and gillnets off Sardinia, Italy. ICES J Mar Sci 63:946–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B (2009) The bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus foraging around a fish farm: effects of prey abundance on dolphins’ behaviour. Current Zool 55(4):243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B, Mariño F (2011) A trial of an acoustic harassment device efficacy on free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in Sardinia, Italy. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 44(4):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B, Shirai JAB (2007) Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) presence and incidental capture in a marine fish farm on the north-eastern coast of Sardinia (Italy). J Mar Biol Assess UK 87:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B, Shirai JAB (2008) Marine aquaculture and bottlenose dolphins’ (Tursiops truntatus) social structure. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62(6):887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B, Shirai JAB (2010) Mediterranean common bottlenose dolphin's repertoire and communication use. In: Pierce AG, Correa L (eds) Dolphins: Anatomy, Behavior, and Threats. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 129–148

  • Díaz López B, Marini L, Polo F (2005) The impact of a fish farm on a bottlenose dolphin population in the Mediterranean Sea. Thalassas 21:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz López B, Bunke M, Shirai JAB (2008) Marine aquaculture off Sardinia Island (Italy): ecosystem effects evaluated through a trophic mass-balance model. Ecol Model 212:292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1999) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture, 1998. Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy

  • FAO (2007) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2006. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Fernandes TF, Eleftheriou A, Ackefors H, Eleftheriou M, Ervik A, Sanchez-Mata A, Scanlon T, White P, Cochrane S, Pearson TH, Miller KL, Read PA (2002) The management of the environmental impacts of aquaculture. Scottish Executive, Aberdeen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjälling A, Wahlberg M, Westerberg H (2006) Acoustic harassment devices reduce seal interaction in the Baltic salmon-trap, net fishery. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1751–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanardi O (1990) I piccoli pelagici nel Mar Tirreno: Osservazioni dopo il primo anno di indagini ittioplanctoniche. Cuaderno ICRAP, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowans S, Würsig B, Karczmarski L (2008) The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework. Adv Mar Biol 53:195–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PS (1986) Estimating the size of naturally marked whale populations using capture-recapture techniques. Rep Int Whaling Comm Spec Issue 8:253–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave BT (2003) Far-field environmental effects of marine finfish aquaculture. A scientific review of the potential environmental effects of aquaculture in aquatic ecosystems. Volume I. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 2450:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper CM, Shaughnessay P, Pemberton D, Mann J, Hume F, Cawthorn M, Würsig B (2003) Aquaculture and marine mammals: coexistence or conflict? In: Gales N, Hindell M, Kirkwood R (eds) Marine mammals: fisheries, tourism and management issues. CSIRO Publishing, Victoria, pp 208–228

  • Lemarié G, Martin JLM, Dutto G, Garidou C (1998) Nitrogenous and phosphorous waste production in a flow-through land-based farm of European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquat Living Resour 11:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machias A, Karakassis I, Giannoulaki M, Papadopoulou KN, Smith CJ, Somarakis S (2005) Response of demersal fish communities to the presence of fish farms. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 288:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann J, Sargeant B (2003) Like mother, like calf: the ontogeny of foraging traditions in wild Indian ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). In: Fragazy DM, Perry S (eds) The biology of traditions: models and evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 236–266

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mann J, Connor RC, Barre LM, Heithaus MR (2000) Female reproductive success in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.): life history, habitat, provisioning, and group-size effects. Behav Ecol 11:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DS (1996) Seal predation at salmon farms in Maine, an overview of the problem and potential solutions. Marine Technol Soc J 30(2):39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash CE, Iwamoto RN, Mahnken CVW (2000) Aquaculture risk management and marine mammal interactions in the Pacific Northwest. Aquaculture 183:307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Mooney H, Beveridge M, Clay J, Folke C, Kautsky N, Lubchenco J, Primavera J, Williams M (1998) Nature’s subsidies to shrimp and salmon farming. Science 282:883–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowacek DP (2002) Sequential foraging behaviour of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Behaviour 139:1125–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesiuk PF, Nichol LM, Sowden MJ, Ford JKB (2002) Effect of the sound generated by an acoustic harassment device on the relative abundance and distribution of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in Retreat Passage, British Columbia. Mar Mamm Sci 18:843–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra GJ, Corkeron PJ, Marsh H (2006) Population sizes, site fidelity and residence patterns of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 129:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay TVR (1992) Aquaculture and the environment. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay TVR (2004) Aquaculture and the environment, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price IM, Nickum JG (1995) Aquaculture and birds: the context for controversy. Col Waterbirds 18 (Special Publication 1):33–45

  • Read P, Fernandes T (2003) Management of environmental impacts of marine aquaculture in Europe. Aquaculture 226:139–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rendell L, Whitehead H (2001) Culture in whales and dolphins. Behav Brain Sci 24:309–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross A (1988) Controlling nature’s predators on fish farms. Rep Mar Conserv Soc

  • Rueggeberg H, Booth J (1989) Interactions between wildlife and salmon farms in British Columbia: results of a survey. Technical Report Series, vol 67. Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon Region, British Columbia

  • Sargeant BL, Wirsing AJ, Heithaus MR, Mann J (2007) Can environmental heterogeneity explain individual foraging variation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane SH (1990) Comparison of Bottlenose Dolphin behaviour in Texas and Florida, with a critique of methods for studying dolphin behaviour. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 541–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Capps JJ, Mann J (2005) The effects of aquaculture on bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops sp.) ranging in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Biol Conserv 124:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe PH, Copley NJ, Boyd SH (1990) Coarse-scale horizontal patchiness and vertical migration of zooplankton in Gulf Stream warm-core ring 82-H. Deep-Sea Res 99:237–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JA, Dawson SM, Slooten E (1993) The abundance and distribution of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Can J Zool 71:2080–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Hammond PS, Thompson PM (1999) Estimating size and assessing trends in a coastal bottlenose dolphin population. Ecol Appl 9(1):288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu RSS (1995) The environmental impact of marine fish culture: towards a sustainable future. Mar Pollut Bull 31(4–12):159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Würsig B, Gailey GA (2002) Responsible marine aquaculture. In: Stickney RR, McVay JP (eds) Marine mammals and aquaculture: conflicts and potential resolutions. CAP International Press, New York, pp 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Würsig B, Jefferson RA (1990) Methods of photo-identification for small cetaceans. Rep Int Whaling Comm Spec Issue 12:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research came from the Bottlenose Dolphin Research Institute—BDRI. This study would not have been possible without the willingness of the fish farm manager Dr. Graziano and fish farm workers, and I wish to thank them for their help and cooperation. Heartfelt thanks are extended to the BDRI member Selma Bajraktarevic who helped with the manuscript and all the volunteers and internships who gave generously of their time to help with field work. Data collection complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bottlenose Dolphin Research Institute (BDRI), Via Diaz 4, Golfo Aranci (Sardinia), Italy

    Bruno Díaz López

Authors
  1. Bruno Díaz López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Díaz López.

Additional information

Communicated by U. Siebert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, B.D. Bottlenose dolphins and aquaculture: interaction and site fidelity on the north-eastern coast of Sardinia (Italy). Mar Biol 159, 2161–2172 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2002-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2002-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation