Abstract
When food supply declines or population density increases, the per capita food availability is reduced causing a decline in condition of consumers. Many consumers alter their feeding behaviour and ultimately the surrounding community (e.g. overgrazing and formation of urchin barrens). This study tested the hypothesis that sea urchin populations are of greater density and poorer condition in barrens (little food) than forest habitat (lots of food). We then tested the hypothesis that a decrease in per capita food supply to urchins has a negative effect not only on their condition but also on their surrounding habitat. We experimentally assessed the effect of limited food supply and increased density of a subtidal Australian sea urchin (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) on their condition (i.e. gonad index) and surrounding benthic habitat (i.e. turf-forming algae). Our results show that a reduction in food supply led to poorer consumer condition and greater herbivory on surrounding local habitat. We provide evidence that per capita food reduction is one of the necessary conditions for the over-consumption by urchins (i.e. urchin barrens), a proposed but previously untested mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson WB, Polis GA (2004) Allochthonous nutrient and food inputs: consequences for temporal stability. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at a landscape level. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 577
Andrew NL (1986) The interaction between diet and density in influencing reproductive output in the echinoid Evechinus chloroticus (Val.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 97:63–79
Andrew NL, Underwood AJ (1993) Density-dependent foraging in the sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii on shallow subtidal reefs in New South Wales, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 99:89–98
Beck HJ, Styan CA (2010) Colour patterns in the sea urchin, Heliocidaris erythrogramma, suggest limited connectivity across the Southern and Pacific Ocean coastlines of Australia. Mar Freshw Res 61:143–152
Breen PA, Mann KH (1976) Changing lobster abundance and the destruction of kelp beds by sea urchins. Mar Biol 34:137–142
Bustamante RH, Branch GM, Eekhout S (1995) Maintenance of an exceptional intertidal grazer biomass in South Africa: subsidy by subtidal kelps. Ecology 76:2314–2329
Camp DK, Cobb SP, van Breedveld JF (1973) Overgrazing of Seagrasses by a Regular Urchin, “Lytechinus variegatus”. Bioscience 23:37–38
Connell SD (2000) Is there safety-in-numbers for prey? Oikos 88:527–532
Connell SD (2007) Subtidal temperate rocky habitats: habitat heterogeneity at local to continental scales. In: Connell SD, Gillanders BM (eds) Mar ecol. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, pp 378–401
Connell SD, Irving AD (2008) Integrating ecology with biogeography using landscape characteristics: a case study of subtidal habitat across continental Australia. J Biogeogr 35:1608–1621
Constable AJ (1990) An investigation of resource allocation in he sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (Valenciennes). Department of Zoology, Melbourne
Crawley KR, Hyndes GA, Vanderklift MA, Revill AT, Nichols PD (2009) Allochthonous brown algae are the primary food source for consumers in a temperate, coastal environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 376:33–44
Dean TA, Schroeter SC, Dixon JD (1984) Effects of grazing by two species of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and Lytechinus anamesus) on recruitment and survival of two species of kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera and Pterygophora californica). Mar Biol 78:301–313
Despland E, Simpson SJ (2005) Food choices of solitarious and gregarious locusts reflect cryptic and aposematic antipredator strategies. Anim Behav 69:471–479
Drummond SP, Connell SD (2005) Quantifying percentage cover of subtidal organisms on rocky coasts: a comparison of the costs and benefits of standard methods. Mar Freshw Res 56:865–876
Duggins DO, Simenstad CA, Estes JA (1989) Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems. Science 245:170–174
Elner RW, Vadas RL (1990) Inference in ecology: the sea-urchin phenomenon in the Northwestern Atlantic. Am Nat 136:108–125
Estes JA, Duggins DO (1995) Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: generality and variation in a community ecological paradigm. Ecol Monogr 65:75–101
Estes JA, Palmisano JF (1974) Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science 185:1058–1060
Goodsell PJ, Fowler-Walker MJ, Gillanders BM, Connell SD (2004) Variations in the configuration of algae in subtidal forests: implications for invertebrate assemblages. Aust Ecol 29:350–357
Guillemain M, Fritz H, Blais S (2000) Foraging methods can affect patch choice: an experimental study in Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Behav Process 50:123–129
Harrold C, Reed DC (1985) Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66:1160–1169
Irving AD, Connell SD (2002) Sedimentation and light penetration interact to maintain heterogeneity of subtidal habitats: algal versus invertebrate dominated assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 245:83–91
Irving AD, Connell SD (2006) Physical disturbance by kelp abrades erect algae from the understorey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 324:127–137
Kawamata S (1998) Effect of wave-induced oscillatory flow on grazing by a subtidal sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus (A. Agassiz). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 224:31–48
Konar B, Estes JA (2003) The stability of boundary regions between kelp beds and deforested areas. Ecology 84:174–185
Lang C, Mann KH (1976) Changes in sea-urchin populations after destruction of kelp beds. Mar Biol 36:321–326
Lauzon-Guay J-S, Scheibling R (2007) Seasonal variation in movement, aggregation and destructive grazing of the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) in relation to wave action and sea temperature. Mar Biol 151:2109–2118
Ling SD, Ibbott S, Sanderson JC (2010) Recovery of canopy-forming macroalgae following removal of the enigmatic grazing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 395:135–146
Lissner AL (1980) Some effects of turbulence on the activity of the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus Verrill. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 48:185–193
Livore JP, Connell SD (2012) Effects of food origin and availability on sea urchin condition and feeding behaviour. J Sea Res 68:1–5
Minor MA, Scheibling RE (1997) Effects of food ration and feeding regime on growth and reproduction of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Mar Biol 129:159–167
Pederson HG, Johnson CR (2007) Growth and age structure of sea urchins (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) in complex barrens and native macroalgal beds in eastern Tasmania. ICES J Mar Sci 65:1–11
Polis GA, Hurd SD (1996) Allochthonous input across habitats, subsidized consumers, and apparent trophic cascades: examples from ocean-land interface. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 275–285
Polis GA, Holt RD, Menge BA, Winemiller KO (1996) Time, space and life history: influences on food webs In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp xiv, 472
Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD (1997) Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Russell BD, Connell SD (2005) A novel interaction between nutrients and grazers alters relative dominance of marine habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 289:5–11
Sanchez-Pinero F, Polis GA (2000) Bottom-up dynamics of Allochthonous Input: direct and indirect effects of seabirds on Islands. Ecology 81:3117–3132
Shears N, Babcock R (2002) Marine reserves demonstrate top-down control of community structure on temperate reefs. Oecologia 132:131–142
Sivertsen K (2006) Overgrazing of kelp beds along the coast of Norway. J Appl Phycol 18:599–610
Smart J, Gill JA (2003) Non-intertidal habitat use by shorebirds: a reflection of inadequate intertidal resources? Biol Conserv 111:359–369
Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, Tegner MJ (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ Conserv 29:436–459
Vanderklift MA, Kendrick GA (2005) Contrasting influence of sea urchins on attached and drift macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 299:101–110
Vanderklift MA, Wernberg T (2008) Detached kelps from distant sources are a food subsidy for sea urchins. Oecologia 157:327–335
Vanderklift MA, Lavery PS, Waddington KI (2009) Intensity of herbivory on kelp by fish and sea urchins differs between inshore and offshore reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 376:203–211
Wellenreuther M, Connell SD (2002) Response of predators to prey abundance: separating the effects of prey density and patch size. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 273:61–71
Wright JT, Dworjanyn SA, Rogers CN, Steinberg PD, Williamson JE, Poore AGB (2005) Density-dependent sea urchin grazing: differential removal of species, changes in community composition and alternative community states. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298:143–156
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank John Naumann and Maria Eugenia Segade for assistance in the field and two anonymous thesis examiners for comments on earlier versions. This study was funded by an Australian Research Council grant to Sean Connell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. Kraufvelin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Livore, J.P., Connell, S.D. Reducing per capita food supply alters urchin condition and habitat. Mar Biol 159, 967–973 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1875-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1875-4