Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Temporal variance of disturbance did not affect diversity and structure of a marine fouling community in north-eastern New Zealand

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural heterogeneity in ecological parameters, like population abundance, is more widely recognized and investigated than variability in the processes that control these parameters. Experimental ecologists have focused mainly on the mean intensity of predictor variables and have largely ignored the potential to manipulate variances in processes, which can be considered explicitly in experimental designs to explore variation in causal mechanisms. In the present study, the effect of the temporal variance of disturbance on the diversity of marine assemblages was tested in a field experiment replicated at two sites on the northeast coast of New Zealand. Fouling communities grown on artificial settlement substrata experienced disturbance regimes that differed in their inherent levels of temporal variability and timing of disturbance events, while disturbance intensity was identical across all levels. Additionally, undisturbed assemblages were used as controls. After 150 days of experimental duration, the assemblages were then compared with regard to their species richness, abundance and structure. The disturbance effectively reduced the average total cover of the assemblages, but no consistent effect of variability in the disturbance regime on the assemblages was detected. The results of this study were corroborated by the outcomes from simultaneous replicate experiments carried out in each of eight different biogeographical regions around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams NM (1994) Seaweeds of New Zealand: an illustrated guide. Canterbury University Press, Chistchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001a) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001b) Permutational test for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN (2007) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, ter Braak CJF (2003) Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. J Stat Comput Simul 73:85–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atalah J, Anderson MJ, Costello MJ (2007) Temporal variability and intensity of grazing: a mesocosm experiment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayling AM (1981) The role of biological disturbance in temperate subtidal encrusting communities. Ecology 62:830–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L (2000) Variance in ecological consumer-resource interactions. Nature 407:370–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L (2003) The importance of the variance around the mean effect size of ecological processes. Ecology 84:2335–2346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L, Bertocci I, Vaselli S, Maggi E (2006) Temporal variance reverses the impact of high mean intensity of stress in climate change experiments. Ecology 87:2489–2499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L, Vaseli S, Maggi E, Bertocci I (2005) Interactive effects of spatial variance and mean intensity of grazing on algal cover in rock pools. Ecology 86:2212–2222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertocci I, Maggi E, Vaselli S, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2005) Contrasting effects of mean intensity and temporal variation of disturbance on assemblages of rocky shores. Ecology 86:2061–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MJ (1989) Community response to variable predation: field studies with sunfish and freshwater invertebrates. Ecol Monogr 59:311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H, Cohen JE (1995) Red, white and blue environmental variance spectra and coexistence in metapopulations. J Theor Biol 176:301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150:519–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial, Plymouth

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ, Myers AA (1996) Turnover of transient species as a contributor to the richness of a stable amphipod (Crustacea) fauna in a sea inlet. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 202:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ, Thrush SF (1991) Colonization of artificial substrata as an multispecies bioassay of marine environmental quality. In: Jeffrey DW, Madden B (eds) Bioindicators and environmental management. Academic, London, pp 401–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2004) Timing of disturbance and coexistence in a species-rich ruderal plant community. Ecology 85:3277–3288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 41:351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JH, Ballantine WJ (1985) Leigh climate report—the climate in 1985. Leigh, Marine Laboratory, University of Auckland 111

  • Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe DJ, Gotelli NJ (2000) Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 124:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1976) Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition and temporal heterogeneity. Am Nat 110:351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete SA (1996) Variable predation: effects of whelks on a mid-intertidal successional community. Ecol Monogr 66:301–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oden NL, Sokal RR (1986) Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Syst Zool 35:604–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JV, Sandgren CD (1983) The effect of temporal environmental heterogeneity on community structure: a replicated experimental study. Oecologia 57:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WP (1979) Experimental investigations of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol Monogr 49:227–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WP (2001) Natural disturbance and dynamics of marine benthic communities. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 85–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden H, Panusch R, Lenz M, Wahl M, Thomason JC (2007) Temporal variability of disturbances: is this important for the diversity of benthic subtidal assemblages? Mar Ecol (in press)

  • Underwood AJ (1996) Spatial patterns of variance in density of intertidal populations. In: Floyd AW, Sheppard AW, De barro PJ (eds) Frontiers of population ecology. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 369–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (2000) Variation in abundances of intertidal populations: consequences of extremities of environment. Hydrobiologia 426:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia N, Heidemann A, Thiel M, Molis M, Wahl M (2005) Effects of disturbance on the diversity of hard-bottom macrobenthic communities on the coast of Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 299:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White PS, Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic, Orlando, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Benedetti-Cecchi (University of Pisa) for helping with the experimental design and data analysis; W. Nelson (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research), D. G. Fautin (University of Kansas), V. Pearse (American Microscopical Society) and J. Buchanan (Victoria University of Wellington) for helping with the taxonomic identification. Thanks to Chloe Rich (University of Wollongong), Carmen Kamlah (University of Rostock), Tiago Porto (Universidade Federal Fluminense) and Mauricio Cifuentes (Universidad Católica del Norte) for helpful discussions. This study was part of the international research project GAME (Global Approach by Modular Experiments), funded by Stiftung Mercator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Atalah.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Atkinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atalah, J., Otto, S.A., Anderson, M.J. et al. Temporal variance of disturbance did not affect diversity and structure of a marine fouling community in north-eastern New Zealand. Mar Biol 153, 199–211 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-007-0798-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-007-0798-6

Keywords

Navigation