Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 5, pp 1951–1957 | Cite as

Temporal changes in activity budgets of chick-rearing Adélie penguins

  • K. YodaEmail author
  • Y. Ropert-Coudert
Research Article


Changes in sea-ice conditions can affect locomotion on land, diving behavior, and corresponding foraging success of penguins. In this study, locomotion on land and diving behavior were compared between early and late stages of the guard phase with different sea-ice conditions using miniaturized time-depth-acceleration data loggers for Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae from 18 December 2001 to 11 January 2002 in Dumont d’Urville, Adélie Land (66.7°S, 140.0°E), Antarctica. Differences were found between early and late stages in the ratio of walking vs. tobogganing, proportion of time spent diving, diving depth as well as in the rate of parental tissue accumulation. In contrast, trip duration, distance traveled on land, and meal delivery rate to chicks did not differ between the stages. This study suggests that physical changes in sea-ice during the penguins’ chick-rearing period may affect certain on-land and/or at-sea behaviors which, in turn, may affect how resources are allocated to self-maintenance or chick-provisioning.


Trip Duration Diving Behavior Diving Depth Dive Duration Chinstrap Penguin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was financially supported by a Research Fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists and by a Grant for the Biodiversity Research of the 21st Century COE (A14). The authors would like to thank all the members of the 52nd wintering party at Dumont d’Urville for their help in the field, the French Institut Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) and the captain and crew of l’Astrolabe for their logistic support; C.A. Bost and G.H. Hosie for their help, hospitality, and advice. Thanks also to Y. Naito, A. Kato, and K. Sato for supplying the loggers. We are grateful to D. Austin and Y. Watanuki for critical comments on the manuscript. All the necessary permits to conduct the research were obtained from the Terres Australes and Antarctiques Françaises and the project was accepted by the scientific and ethics committee of the Institut Paul-Emile Victor.


  1. Ainley DG, Wilson PR, Barton KJ, Ballard G, Nur N, Karl B (1998) Diet and foraging effort of Adélie penguins in relation to pack-ice conditions in the southern Ross sea. Polar Biol 20:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainley DG (2002) The Adélie penguin: bellwether of climate change. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainley DG, Ballard G, Dugger KM (2006) Competition among penguins and cetaceans reveals trophic cascades in the western Ross sea, Antarctica. Ecology 87:2080–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannasch R, Wilson RP, Culik B (1994) Hydrodynamic aspects of design and attachment of a back-mounted device in penguins. J Exp Biol 194:83–96Google Scholar
  5. Bautista LM, Tinbergen J, Kacelnik A (2001) To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes. PNAS 98:1089–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croxall JP, Trathan PN, Murphy EJ (2002) Environmental change and Antarctic seabird populations. Science 297:1510–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dall SRX, Johnstone RA (2002) Managing uncertainty: information and insurance under the risk of starvation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1519–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Irvine LG, Clarke JR, Kerry KR (2000) Low breeding success of the Adélie penguin at Béchervaise Island in the 1998/99 season. CCAMLR Sci 7:151–167Google Scholar
  10. Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2006) Sea ice affects the population dynamics of Adélie penguins in Terre Adélie. Polar Biol 29:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kato A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Naito Y (2002) Changes in Adélie penguin breeding populations in Lützow-Holm Bay, Antarctica, in relation to sea-ice conditions. Polar Biol 25:934–938Google Scholar
  12. Monaghan P, Uttley JD, Burns MD, Thaine C, Blackwood J (1989) The relationship between food supply, reproductive effort and breeding success in arctic terns Sterna paradisaea. J Anim Ecol 58:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pinshow B, Fedak MA, Schmidt-Nielsen (1977) Terrestrial locomotion in penguins: it costs more to waddle. Science 195:592–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodary D, Wienecke BC, Bost CA (2000) Diving behaviour of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) at Dumont D’Urville, Antarctica: nocturnal patterns of diving and rapid adaptations to changes in sea-ice condition. Polar Biol 23:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rombolá E, Marschoff E, Coria N (2003) Comparative study of the effects of the late pack-ice break-off on chinstrap and Adélie penguins’ diet and reproductive success at Laurie Island, South Orkney Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 26:41–48Google Scholar
  16. Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP, Daunt F, Kato A (2004) Patterns of energy acquisition by a central place forager: benefits of alternating short and long foraging trips. Behav Ecol 15:824–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP (2005) Trends and perspectives in animal-attached remote sensing. Front Ecol Environ 3:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Mori Y, Naito Y (1993) Diving performance of adélie penguins in relation to food availability in fast sea-ice areas: comparison between years. J Anim Ecol 62:634–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Naito Y, Robertson G, Robinson S (1997) Diving and foraging behaviour of Adélie penguins in areas with and without fast sea-ice. Polar Biol 17:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Sato K, Niizuma Y, Bost CA, Le Maho Y, Naito Y (2002) Parental mass change and food provisioning in Adélie penguins rearing chicks in colonies with contrasting sea-ice conditions. Polar Biol 25:672–681Google Scholar
  21. Watanuki Y, Takahashi A, Daunt F, Wanless S, Harris M, Sato K, Naito Y (2005) Regulation of stroke and glide in a foot-propelled avian diver. J Exp Biol 208:2207–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams TD, Rothery P (1990) Factors affecting variation in foraging and activity patterns of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) during the breeding season at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Appl Ecol 27:1042–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams TD (1995) The Pneguins. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson RP (1984) An improved stomach pump for penguins and other seabirds. J Field Ornithol 55:109–112Google Scholar
  25. Wilson RP, Culik B, Adelung D, Coria NR, Spairani HJ (1991) To slide or stride: when should Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) toboggan? Can J Zool 69:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson RP, Pütz K, Peters G, Culik B, Scolaro AJ, Charrassin J-B, Ropert-Coudert Y (1997) Long-term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds. Wildl Soc Bull 25:101–106Google Scholar
  27. Wilson PR, Ainley DG, Nur N, Jacobs SS, Barton KJ, Ballard G, Comiso JC (2001) Adélie penguin population change in the pacific sector of Antarctica: relation to sea-ice extent and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoda K, Naito Y, Sato K, Takahashi A, Nishikawa J, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kurita M, Le Maho Y (2001) A new technique for monitoring the behaviour of free-ranging Adélie penguins. J Exp Biol 204:685–690PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of Polar ResearchTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations