Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 5, pp 1907–1915 | Cite as

Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) egg density measurements in the Bay of Biscay: evidence for the spatial variation in egg density with sea surface salinity

  • Anne Goarant
  • Pierre PetitgasEmail author
  • Paul Bourriau
Research Article


Knowledge of the pelagic vertical distribution of fish eggs is central for several aspects of fisheries science including fisheries recruitment and egg production studies. In modelling egg vertical distributions, variation in fish egg density is an important issue. Though variation in egg density between individual eggs has been reported, evidence for significant spatial variation in egg density is novel. The present study provides evidence that egg density of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) varies spatially across spawning sites in the Bay of Biscay, depending on the regional scale variation in sea water properties due to river discharge. We measured the density of the eggs using a density gradient column at 17 stations in 2005 and 2006 as well as their diameter. At station, the variability in the individual egg density was statistically distributed according to a Gaussian probability function. Significant variation in the mean egg density was observed across stations. Mean egg density displayed a significant correlation with sea surface salinity. Results are discussed in light of the mechanisms determining the egg density.


Surface Salinity Oocyte Hydration Block Kriging Purse Seine Fishery Ichthyoplankton Sampling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank Jacques Massé (Ifremer in Nantes) for organising the PelGas cruise in a way that allowed for the egg sampling and density measurements. Daniel Halgand (Ifremer in Nantes) contributed to the measurements on board. The study was supported by the Ifremer project FOREVAR affiliated to GLOBEC, and the European projects FISBOAT and UNCOVER.


  1. Bourriau P (1991) The “Carré Net”. ICES CM 1991/L:53Google Scholar
  2. Boyra G, Rueda L, Coombs S, Sundby S, Adlandsvisk B, Santos M, Uriarte A (2003) Modelling the vertical distribution of eggs of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus). Fish Oceanogr 12(4/5):381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coombs S (1981) A density-gradient column for determining the specific gravity of fish eggs with particular reference to eggs of mackerel Scomber scombrus. Mar Biol 63:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coombs S, Fosh C, Keen M (1985) The buoyancy and vertical distribution of eggs of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and pilchard (Sardina pilchardus). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 65:461–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coombs S, Boyra G, Rueda L, Uriarte A, Santos M, Conway D, Halliday N (2004) Buoyancy measurements and vertical distribution of eggs of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus). Mar Biol 145:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craik J, Harvey S (1987) The causes of buoyancy in eggs of marine teleosts. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 67:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fabra M, Raldúa D, Power DM, Deen PMT, Cerdà J (2005) Marine fish egg hydration is aquaporin-mediated. Science 307:545–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gordina AD, Nikolskiy VN, Niermann U, Bingel F, Subbotin AA (1997) New data on the morphological differences of anchovy eggs (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Black Sea. Fish Res 31:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koutsikopoulos C, Le Cann B (1996) Physical processes and hydrological structures related to the Bay of Biscay anchovy. Scientia Marina 60(Suppl.2):9–19Google Scholar
  10. Manly B (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, 399pGoogle Scholar
  11. Matheron G (1971) The Theory of Regionalised Variables and its Applications. Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathématique de Fontainebleau. Fascicule 5, Ecole des Mines de Paris, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Mellinger J (1994) La flottabilité des oeufs de téléostéens. Année biologique 33(3):117–138Google Scholar
  13. Motos L (1996) Reproductive biology and fecundity of the Bay of Biscay anchovy population (Engraulis encrasicolus L.). Scientia Marina 60(Suppl.2):195–207Google Scholar
  14. Motos L, Uriarte A, Valencia V (1996) The spawning environment of the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.). Scientia Marina 60(Suppl.2):117–140Google Scholar
  15. Nissling A, Vallin L (1996) The ability of cod eggs to maintain neutral buoyancy and the opportunity for survival in fluctuating conditions in the Baltic Sea. J Fish Biol 48:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nissling A, Müller A, Hinrichsen HH (2003) Specific gravity and vertical distribution of sprat eggs in the Baltic Sea. J Fish Biol 63:280–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palomera I (1991) Vertical distribution of eggs and larvae of Engraulis encrasicolus in stratified waters of the western Mediterranean. Mar Biol 111:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parada C, van der Lingen C, Mullon C, Penven P (2003) Modelling the effect of buoyancy on the transport of anchovy (Engraulis capensis) eggs from spawning to nursery grounds in the southern Benguela: an IBM approach. Fish Oceanogr 12:170–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petitgas P, Magri S, Lazure P (2006) One-dimensional biophysical modelling of fish egg vertical distribution in shelf seas. Fish Oceanogr 15:413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Planque B, Lazure P, Jegou AM (2006) Typology of hydrological structures modelled and observed over the Bay of Biscay shelf. Scientia Marina 70(Suppl.1):43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russel FS (1976) The eggs and planktonic stages of British marine fishes. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3–4):591–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solemdal P (1971) Prespawning flounders transferred to different salinities and the effects on their eggs. Vie et milieu 1(Suppl 22):409–423Google Scholar
  24. Sundby S (1983) A one-dimensional model for the vertical distribution of pelagic fish eggs in the mixed layer. Deep Sea Res 30(6A):645–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sundby S (1991) Factors affecting the vertical distribution of eggs. ICES Mar Sci Symp 192:33–38Google Scholar
  26. Westgård T (1989) Two models for the vertical distribution of pelagic fish eggs in the turbulent upper layer of the ocean. In: Rapp P-V, Réun Const Int Explor Mer 191: 195–200Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Ecology and Models for FisheriesIFREMERcdx 3, NantesFrance

Personalised recommendations