Abstract
Juvenile red sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, aggregate under adult conspecifics, whereas sympatric juvenile green sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, are typically more solitary and dispersed. Neither the potential advantage of juvenile sheltering nor the differences in post-settlement behavior between the two species has been demonstrated experimentally, but may be related to protection from predators and/or hydrodynamics. In predation experiments, juvenile vulnerability differed in the two species as the seastar Pycnopodia helianthoides consistently chose juvenile S. franciscanus over S. droebachiensis (100% vs. 0%). When associated with adults, juvenile mortality decreased dramatically in S. franciscanus (90% alone vs. 5% with adults), but very little in S. droebachiensis (85% vs. 75%). Not surprisingly, juvenile behavioral responses in the two species reflect this difference in vulnerability. Juvenile S. franciscanus sheltered under adults when predation risk was high, but not when risk was low (44% vs. 13%), whereas sheltering in S. droebachiensis was infrequent and not related to predation risk (7% for high risk versus 5% for low risk). From a hydrodynamic perspective, the presence of an adult led to the creation of a hydrodynamic refuge for juveniles, where average water velocities were reduced by > 60% around the adult urchin. Again, striking differences in sheltering rate were apparent in S. franciscanus (52% vs. 13% for high flow and low flow, respectively), but not S. droebachiensis (5% for high flow versus 4% for low flow). Sheltering behavior was also species-specific as juveniles did not shelter at high rates under adults of the opposite species (≤ 16%). A field survey confirmed these finding in that juvenile S. franciscanus abundance was associated with both adults and water motion (R 2 = 0.80, P = 0.008, best-subsets regression). These results suggest that sheltering confers juvenile S. franciscanus with a degree of protection from predators and water motion, and that species-specific differences in this post-settlement behavior may be related to the differences in the protection afforded by adults.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman JD, Okubo A (1993) Reduced mixing in a marine macrophyte canopy. Funct Ecol 7:305–309
Ackerman JD, Hoover TM (2001) Measurement of local bed shear stress in streams using a Preston-static tube. Limnol Oceanogr 46:2080–2087
Adkins BE, Harbo RM, Breen PA (1981) A survey of commercial sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) populations in the Gulf Islands, November 1980. Can Manuscr Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1618:1–41
Arsenault DJ, Himmelman JH (1996) Size-related changes in vulnerability to predators and spatial refuge use by juvenile Iceland scallops (Chlamys islandica). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140:115–122
Bouma H, de Vries PP, Duiker JMC, Herman PMJ, Wolff WJ (2001) Migration of the bivalve Macoma balthica on a highly dynamic tidal flat in the Westerschelde estuary, The Netherlands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 224:157–170
Breen PA, Adkins BE (1982) Observations of abalone populations on the north coast of British Columbia, July 1980. Can Manuscr Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1633:1–55
Breen PA, Carolsfeld W, Yamanaka KL (1985) Social behavior of juvenile red sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus (Agassiz). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 92:45–61
Cameron RA, Schroeter SC (1980) Sea urchin Strongylocentrotus spp recruitment: effect of substrate selection on juvenile distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2:243–248
Cardinale BJ, Palmer MA, Collins SL (2002) Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415:426–429
Connolly SR, Menge BA, Roughgarden J (2001) A latitudinal gradient in recruitment of intertidal invertebrates in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Ecology 82:1799–1813
Cowen RK (1983) The effect of sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) predation on red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) populations: an experimental analysis. Oecologia 58:249–255
Duggins DO (1981) Interspecific facilitation in a guild of benthic marine herbivores. Oecologia 48:157–163
Duggins DO (1983) Starfish predation and the creation of mosaic patterns in a kelp-dominated community. Ecology 64:1610–1619
Ebert TA (1983) Recruitment in Echinoderms. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence JM (eds) Echinoderm Studies. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp169–203
Gagnon P, Wagner G, Himmelman JH (2003) Use of a wave tank to study the effects of water motion and algal movement on the displacement of the sea star Asterias vulgaris towards its prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 258:125–132
Gaines S, Roughgarden J (1985) Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. PNAS 82:3707–3711
Gillanders B, Able KJB, Eggleston D, Sheridan P (2003) Evidence of connectivity between juvenile and adult habitats for mobile marine fauna: an important component of nurseries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247:281–295
Gosselin LA, Qian PY (1997) Juvenile mortality in benthic marine invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146:265–282
Hagen NT, Mann KH (1994) Experimental analysis of factors influencing the aggregating behavior of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Muller). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 176:107–126
Harris LG, Chester CM (1996) Effects of location, exposure and physical structure on juvenile recruitment of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in the Gulf of Maine. Invertebr Reprod Dev 30:207–215
Hendler G, Grygier MJ, Maldonado E, Benton J (1999) Babysitting brittlestars: heterospecific symbiosis between ophiuroids (Echinodermata). Invertebr Biol 118:190–201
Hunt HL, Scheibling RE (1997) Role of early post-settlement mortality in recruitment of benthic marine invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 155:269–301
Jonsson PR, Berntsson KM, Larsson AI (2004) Linking larval supply to recruitment: flow-mediated control of initial adhesion of barnacle larvae. Ecology 85(10):2850–2859
Lambert DLH (2000) Larval settlement of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, in the southern Gulf of Maine. Invertebr Biol 119:403–409
Low CG (1975) The effects of grouping of Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, the giant red sea urchin, on its population biology. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Menge BA (2000) Recruitment vs. postrecruitment processes as determinants of barnacle population abundance. Ecol Monogr 70:265–288
Moitoza DJ, Phillips DW (1979) Prey defense, predator preference, and nonrandom diet: the interactions between Pycnopodia helianthoides and two species of sea urchins. Mar Biol 53:299–304
Morgan LE (1997) Spatial variability in growth, mortality and recruitment in the northern California red sea urchin fishery. PhD thesis, UC Davis
Nishizaki MT, Ackerman JD (2001) Gimme shelter: factors influencing juvenile sheltering in Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. In: Barker M (ed) Echinoderms 2000. Swets & Zeitlinger, Dunedin, New Zealand, pp515–520
Nishizaki MT, Ackerman JD (2004) Juvenile-adult associations in sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. droebachiensis: Is nutrition involved? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:93–103
Nishizaki MT, Ackerman JD (2005) A secondary chemical cue facilitates juvenile-adult post-settlement associations in red sea urchins. Limnol Oceanogr 50(1):354–362
Nowell ARM, Jumars PA (1984) Flow environments of aquatic benthos. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:303–328
Pace D (1975) Environmental control of red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) vertical distribution in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University. Vancouver, Canada
Porter ET, Sanford LP, Suttles SE (2000) Gypsum dissolution is not a universal integrator of ‘water motion’. Limnol and Oceanogr 45:145–158
Rogers-Bennett L, Bennett WA, Fastenau HC, Dewees CM (1995) Spatial variation in red sea urchin reproduction and morphology: Implications for harvest refugia. Ecol Appl 5:1171–1180
Rowley RJ (1990) Newly settled sea-urchins in a kelp bed and urchin barren ground—a comparison of growth and mortality. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 62(3):229–240
Rowley RJ (1989) Settlement and recruitment of sea-urchins (Strongylocentrotus spp) in a sea-urchin barren ground and a kelp bed—are populations regulated by settlement or post-settlement processes. Mar Biol 100(4):485–449
Scheibling RE, Hatcher BG (2001) The ecology of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. In: Lawrence J (ed) Edible Sea Urchins: Biology and Ecology. Elsevier Science, pp271–306
Sloan NA, Lauridsen CP, Harbo RM (1987) Recruitment characteristics of the commercially harvested red sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus in southern British Columbia, Canada. Fish Res 5:55–69
Tegner MJ, Dayton PK (1977) Sea urchin recruitment patterns and implications of commercial fishing. Science 196:324–326
Tegner MJ, Dayton PK (1981) Population structure, recruitment and mortality of two sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus) in a kelp forest. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 5:255–268
Tegner MJ, Levin LA (1983) Spiny lobsters and sea urchins: analysis of a predator-prey interaction. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 73:125–150
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge J. Grayson, J. Mortimor, and D. Johnson for their diving assistance in field study, BMSC Director, A. Spencer for providing facilities, Island Scallops for providing juvenile urchins, and several anonymous reviewers for commenting on the manuscript. Financial support was provided by the Pacific Urchin Harvester’s Association, West Coast Green Urchin Harvester’s Association, a WCUMBS graduate award to MTN and Fisheries Renewal BC and NSERC grants to JDA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by R.J. Thompson, St. John´s.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nishizaki, M.T., Ackerman, J.D. Juvenile–adult associations in sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. droebachiensis): protection from predation and hydrodynamics in S. franciscanus . Mar Biol 151, 135–145 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0462-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0462-6