Skip to main content
Log in

Herbivory in the gammarid amphipod Aora typica: relationships between consumption rates, performance and abundance across ten seaweed species

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reveals a substantial capacity for herbivory of seaweeds in the gammarid amphipod Aora typica, adults eating seven of ten taxonomically and morphologically diverse seaweed species offered to them in a no-choice assay. The green algae Ulva spathulata and Enteromorpha intestinalis were consumed at the highest rates in both no-choice (2.3–2.5 mg blotted weight individual−1 day−1) and multiple-choice assays (0.5–1.3 mg blotted weight individual−1 day−1). Adult A. typica collected from two different species of brown seaweeds had very similar feeding preferences to each other. Juvenile A. typica grew to reproductive maturity on the green algae E. intestinalis and U. spathulata, and the brown algae Carpophyllum maschalocarpum and Ecklonia radiata. In common with previous studies on members of other amphipod families, survivorship of juvenile amphipods was positively correlated with feeding preferences of adults across seaweed species (r 2=0.43, P=0.04). However, densities of A. typica on seaweeds in the field (excluding the intertidal E. intestinalis and U. spathulata) were not significantly correlated with feeding preferences of adults (r 2=0.07, P=0.5) or survivorship of juveniles (r 2=0.17, P=0.31). This suggests that either host seaweeds are not a major dietary component of these amphipods in nature, or that the host’s value as a food source is overridden by other properties such as the degree of shelter it affords from larger consumers. This study provides the first demonstration that a member of the cosmopolitan amphipod family Aoridae is capable of consuming a diverse range of seaweeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams NM (1994) Seaweeds of New Zealand: an illustrated guide. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrontes J (1999) On the evolution of interactions between marine mesoherbivores and algae. Bot Mar 42:137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard JL (1972) The marine fauna of New Zealand: algae-living littoral Gammaridea (Crustacea Amphipoda). N Z Oceanogr Inst Mem 62:1–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry JP, Ehret MJ (1993) Diet, food preference, and algal availability for fishes and crabs on intertidal reef communities in southern California. Environ Biol Fishes 37:75–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS (1991) Amphipods as insect equivalents? An alternative view. Ecology 72:350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowsky B (1980) The pattern of tube-sharing in Microdeutopus gryllotalpa (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Anim Behav 28:790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowsky R, Borowsky B (1990) Feeding inhibition of the salt marsh amphipod Gammarus palustris Bousfield, 1969 by heat-labile substances in Ulva lactuca L. Crustaceana 59:299–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH (1992) Mesoherbivores. In: John DM, Hawkins SJ, Price JH (eds) Plant–animal interactions in the marine benthos. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 235–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschmann AH (1990) Intertidal macroalgae as refuge and food for Amphipoda in central Chile. Aquat Bot 36:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle G, Peck LS (1995) The influence of acclimation and substratum on the metabolism of the Antarctic amphipods Waldeckia obesa (Chevreux 1905) and Bovallia gigantea (Pfeffer 1888). Polar Biol 15:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlan KE (1994) Amphipod crustaceans and environmental disturbance: a review. J Nat Hist 28:519–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Rivera E, Hay ME (2000) Can quantity replace quality? Food choice, compensatory feeding, and fitness of marine mesograzers. Ecology 81:201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Rivera E, Hay ME (2001) Macroalgal traits and the feeding and fitness of an herbivorous amphipod: the roles of selectivity, mixing, and compensation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 218:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon IMT, Moore PG (1997) A comparative study on the tubes and feeding behaviour of eight species of corophioid Amphipoda and their bearing on phylogenetic relationships within the Corophioidea. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Hay ME (1991) Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecology 72:1286–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Hay ME (1994) Herbivore resistance to seaweed chemical defense: the roles of mobility and predation risk. Ecology 75:1304–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ (1983) The ecology of south-east Tasmanian phytal animal communities. I. Spatial organization on a local scale. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 70:129–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enequist P (1950) Studies on the soft-bottom amphipods of the Skagerak. Zool Bidr Upps 28:297–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox G A (1993) Failure-time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship, and other waiting times. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 253–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Galán Jiménez E, Hauxwell J, Heckscher E, Rietsma C, Valiela I (1996) Selection of nitrogen-enriched macroalgae (Cladophora vagabunda and Gracilaria tikvahiae) by the herbivorous amphipod Microdeutopus gryllotalpa. Biol Bull 191:323–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart CB (1939) Notes on the bionomics of the tube-building amphipod, Leptocheirus pilosus Zaddach. J Mar Biol Assoc 23:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1992) The role of seaweed chemical defenses in the evolution of feeding specialization and in the mediation of complex interactions. In: Paul VJ (ed) Ecological roles of marine natural products. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, pp 93–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1997) The ecology and evolution of seaweed–herbivore interactions on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 16(Suppl): S67–S76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Duffy JE, Pfister CA, Fenical W (1987) Chemical defense against different marine herbivores: are amphipods insect equivalents? Ecology 68:1567–1580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Renaud PE, Fenical W (1988) Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses. Oecologia 75:246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Steinberg PD (1992) The chemical ecology of plant-herbivore interactions in marine versus terrestrial communities. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites, 2nd edn, vol II: Evolutionary and ecological processes. Academic, San Diego, pp 371–413

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher E, Hauxwell J, Galán Jiménez E, Rietsma C, Valiela I (1996) Selectivity by the herbivorous amphipod Microdeutopus gryllotalpa among five species of macroalgae. Biol Bull 191:324–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littler MM, Littler DS (1980) The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. Am Nat 116:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1978) Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. Am Nat 112:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH (1988) The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can J Zool 66:2329–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBane CD, Croker RA (1983) Animal–algal relationships of the amphipod Hyale nilssoni (Rathke) in the rocky intertidal. J Crustacean Biol 3:592–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers AA, Costello MJ (1984) The amphipod genus Aora in British and Irish waters. J Mar Biolog Assoc UK 64:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers AA, Moore PG (1983) The New Zealand and south-east Australian species of Aora Krøyer (Amphipoda, Gammaridea). Rec Aust Mus 35:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotri ME (1980) Factors involved in herbivore food preference. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JA, Nelson WA (1998) Typification of the Australasian brown alga Zonaria turneriana J. Agardh (Dictyotales) and description of the endemic New Zealand species, Zonaria aureomarginata sp. nov. Bot Mar 41:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore AGB (1994) Selective herbivory by amphipods inhabiting the brown alga Zonaria angustata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poore AGB, Steinberg PD (1999) Preference-performance relationships and effects of host plant choice in an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecol Monogr 69:443–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AI, Lucas JS (1983) Food choice, feeding rates, and the turnover of macrophyte biomass by a surf-zone inhabiting amphipod. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 72:99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandifer PA, Zielinski PB, Castro WE (1975) Enhanced survival of larval grass shrimp in dilute solutions of the synthetic polymer, polyethylene oxide. Fish Bull 73:678–680

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1990) SAS/STAT® user’s guide, version 6, 4th edn, vol 2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

  • Shillaker RO, Moore PG (1987) The feeding habits of the amphipods Lembos websteri Bate and Corophium bonnellii Milne Edwards. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 110:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RB, Cole RG (1994) Mobile epifauna on subtidal brown seaweeds in northeastern New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 115:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RB, Steinberg PD (2005) Host use by Australasian seaweed mesograzers in relation to feeding preferences of larger grazers. Ecology 86:2955–2967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegner MJ, Dayton PK (1987) El Niño effects on southern California kelp forest communities. Adv Ecol Res 17:243–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne KL, Wolfe GV, Freidenburg TL, Neill A, Hicken C (2001) Activated defense systems in marine macroalgae: evidence for an ecological role for DMSP cleavage. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R, Gibson R, Harrington J (1979) Herbivory and detritivory among gammaridean amphipods from a Florida seagrass community. Mar Biol 54:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a University of Auckland Early Career Research Excellence Award to R. Taylor. We thank N. Barr for sharing his observations, and L. Zemke-White for collecting Ulva pertusa from the Mokohinau Islands. Ulva pertusa was identified by L. McIvor. Thanks also to A. Poore for initially alerting us to the capacity of Aora spp. to consume seaweeds, and M. Costello and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive criticism of the manuscript. The experiments comply with the current laws of New Zealand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard B. Taylor.

Additional information

Communicated by G.F. Humphrey, Sydney

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, R.B., Brown, P.J. Herbivory in the gammarid amphipod Aora typica: relationships between consumption rates, performance and abundance across ten seaweed species. Mar Biol 149, 455–463 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0245-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0245-0

Keywords

Navigation