Marine Biology

, Volume 147, Issue 6, pp 1413–1417 | Cite as

Experimental evidence for selection against fish larvae with high metabolic rates in a food limited environment

  • A. B. Bochdansky
  • P. GrønkjærEmail author
  • T. P. Herra
  • W. C. Leggett
Research Article


We provide experimental evidence for a direct link between embryonic metabolism and longevity in the larval stage of a marine fish when food resources are limited. Since growth rates of otoliths are closely related to metabolic rates, the area inside the hatch check (i.e., deposition of otolith matrix during embryonic development) is representative of inherent differences in metabolic rates. When exposed to food limitation, larvae with larger hatch check areas died earlier than larvae with smaller hatch check areas. This relationship did not occur in larvae that fed at saturated levels. A simple explanation for these observations is that larvae, which consumed metabolic fuel at higher rates died earlier unless energy derived from food was not limiting. Since high growth rates are linked to high metabolic rates, this mechanism could efficiently counteract selection for faster average growth but only when resources are limiting.


Metabolic Rate Residual Energy Fish Larva High Metabolic Rate Metabolic Intensity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors wish to thank Pierre Pepin for providing laboratory space and logistical support at the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Center, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. We also like to thank Stephanie Carter, Naomi Brunemeyer and Jonathan Fisher for their support during larval rearing and plankton collections.


  1. Bang A, Grønkjær P (2005) Otolith size-at-hatch reveals embryonic oxygen consumption in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Mar BiolGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey KM, Houde ED (1989) Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem. Adv Mar Biol 25:1–83Google Scholar
  3. Bayne BL (2000) Relations between variable rates of growth, metabolic costs and growth efficiencies in individual Sydney rock oysters (Saccostrea commercialis). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 251:185–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell G (1997) Selection. The mechanism of evolution. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Djawdan M, Rose MR, Bradley TJ (1997) Does selection for stress resistance lower metabolic rates? Ecology 78:828–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garland T Jr, Else PL (1987) Seasonal, sexual, and individual variation in endurance and activity metabolism in lizards. Am J Physiol 252:R439–R449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Haury LR, McGowan JA, Wiebe PH (1978) Patterns and processes in the time-space scales of plankton distributions. In: Steele JH (ed) Spatial patterns in plankton communities. Plenum Press, New York, pp 277–327Google Scholar
  9. Hayes JP, Garland T Jr, Dohm MR (1992) Individual variation in metabolism and reproduction of Mus: are energetics and life history linked? Funct Ecol 6:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Houde ED (1987) Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability. Am Fish Soc Symp 2:17–29Google Scholar
  11. Huuskonen H, Karjalainen J (1998) A preliminary study on the relationships between otolith increment width, metabolic rate and growth in juvenile whitefish (Coregonus larvaretus L.). Arch Hydrobiol 142:371–383Google Scholar
  12. Kieser J (1995). Stress and economical constraints to phenotypic evolution. Evol Theory 10:305–316Google Scholar
  13. Kiørboe T (1989) Growth in fish larvae: are they particularly efficient? Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:383–389Google Scholar
  14. Kleiber M (1961) The fire of life. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Konarzewski M, Diamond J (1995) Evolution of basal metabolic rate and organ masses in laboratory mice. Evolution 49:1239–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meekan MG, Fortier L (1996) Selection for fast growth during the larval life of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua on the Scotian Shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 137:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Metcalfe NB, Taylor AC, Thorpe JE (1995) Metabolic rate, social status and life-history strategies in Atlantic salmon. Anim Behav 49:431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosegaard H, Svedang H, Taberman K (1988) Uncoupling of somatic and otolith growth rates in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) as an effect of differences in temperature response. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:1514–1524Google Scholar
  19. Rombough PJ (1994) Energy partitioning during fish development: additive or compensatory allocation of energy to support growth? Funct Ecol 8:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sasaki A, Ellner S (1995) The evolutionary stable phenotype distribution in a random environment. Evolution 49:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wieser W (1995) Energetics of fish larvae, the smallest vertebrates. Acta Physiol Scand 154:279–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright PJ, Metcalfe NB, Thorpe JE (2001) The relationship between otolith accretion and resting metabolic rate in juvenile Atlantic salmon during a change in temperature. J Fish Biol 59:657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. B. Bochdansky
    • 1
  • P. Grønkjær
    • 2
    Email author
  • T. P. Herra
    • 3
  • W. C. Leggett
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Ocean earth and Atmospheric SciencesOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marine Ecology, Institute of Biological SciencesUniversity of AarhusAarhus NDenmark
  3. 3.Biology DepartmentQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations