Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 144, Issue 4, pp 675–684 | Cite as

Induced anti-predator responses of the green mussel, Perna viridis (L.), on exposure to the predatory gastropod, Thais clavigera Küster, and the swimming crab, Thalamita danae Stimpson

  • S. G. CheungEmail author
  • S. Lam
  • Q. F. Gao
  • K. K. Mak
  • P. K. S. Shin
Research Article

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was conducted to test whether anti-predator responses could be induced in the green mussel, Perna viridis, on exposure to waterborne cues from two predators, the muricid gastropod, Thais clavigera, and the portunid crab, Thalamita danae, and from damaged conspecifics. There were five treatments in this study. Aquaria of two treatments housed either Thalamita danae or Thais clavigera. Another three treatments housed only intact mussels, broken and intact mussels, or no mussels. No significant differences were found among these five treatments in final shell weight and tissue dry weight. Induced defensive responses were predator-specific. Experimental mussels exposed to waterborne cues of T. clavigera had a higher percentage increase in shell length, height and width, whereas those exposed to waterborne cues of T. danae had a higher percentage increase in shell width and height. Mussels raised in the presence of crabs developed thicker shell at the umbo and lip margin, whereas mussels raised in the presence of gastropods had thicker shell lip. Predator preference for mussels from the control group and for those pre-exposed to waterborne cues of either of the predators was studied. T. clavigera preferentially selected mussels from the control group, whereas no prey preference was found for T. danae, although shell breaking time for mussels exposed to a crab was longer than that for the control. While the present results should be viewed with caution in the absence of a dietary control, this was the first time that prey handling was shown to be affected by defensive changes in the morphology of mussels.

Keywords

Shell Thickness Shell Length Shell Height Thick Shell Shell Width 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from City University of Hong Kong (Project No. 7100160). We thank Prof. Raymond Seed and Dr. Desmond O’Toole for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Constructive comments from the two anonymous reviewers are also appreciated.

References

  1. Appleton RD, Palmer AR (1988) Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 85:4387–4391Google Scholar
  2. Carriker MR (1981) Shell penetration and feeding by naticacean and muricacean predatory gastropods: a synthesis. Malacologia 20:403–422Google Scholar
  3. Cheung SG (1991) Energetics of transplanted populations of green-lipped mussel Perna viridis (Bivalvia: Mytilacea) in Hong Kong. I. Growth, condition and reproduction. Asian Mar Biol 8:117–131Google Scholar
  4. Cheung SG (1993) Population dynamics and energy budgets of green-lipped mussel Perna viridis (Linnaeus) in a polluted harbour. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 163:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Côťe IM (1995) Effects of predatory crab effluent on byssus production in mussels. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 188:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Currey JD (1979) The effect of drying on the strength of mollusc shells. J Zool (Lond) 188:301–308Google Scholar
  7. Davidson RJ (1986) Mussel selection by the paddle crab Ovalipes catharus (White): evidence of flexible foraging behaviour. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 102:281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeWitt TJ (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity: tests with predator-induced morphology and life history in a freshwater snail. J Evolut Biol 11:465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elner RW (1978) The mechanics of predation by the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L.), on the edible mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Oecologia 36:333–344Google Scholar
  10. Gelowitz CM, Mathis A, Smith RJF (1993) Chemosensory recognition of northern pike (Esox lucius) by brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans): population differences and the influence of predator diet. Behaviour 127:105–118Google Scholar
  11. Hagen NT, Andersen Å, Stabell OB (2002) Alarm responses of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, induced by chemically labeled durophagous predators and simulated acts of predation. Mar Biol 140:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q Rev Biol 65:323–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hay ME, Fenical W (1996) Chemical ecology and marine biodiversity: insights and products from the sea. Oceanography 9:10–20Google Scholar
  14. Huang ZG, Lee SY, Mak PMS (1985) The distribution and population structure of Perna viridis (Bivalvia: Mytilacea) in Hong Kong waters. In: Morton BS, Dudgeon D (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 465–471Google Scholar
  15. Hughes RN, Dunkin SB (1984) Behavioural components of prey selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.) feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis L. in the laboratory. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 77:45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394Google Scholar
  17. Lee SY (1985) The population dynamics of the green mussel, Perna viridis (L.) in Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong—dominance in a polluted environment. Asian Mar Biol 2:107–118Google Scholar
  18. Leonard GH, Bertness MD, Yund PO (1999) Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defenses in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Ecology 80:1–14Google Scholar
  19. Lin J (1990) Mud crab predation on ribbed mussels in salt marshes. Mar Biol 107:103–109Google Scholar
  20. Liu JH, Morton B (1994) The temperature tolerances of Tetraclita squamosa (Crustacea: Cirripedia) and Septifer virgatus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) on a subtropical rocky shore in Hong Kong. J Zool (Lond) 234:325–339Google Scholar
  21. Lockwood JR III (1998) On the statistical analysis of multiple-choice feeding preference experiments. Oecologia 116:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mascaró M, Seed R (2000) Foraging behaviour of Carcinus maenas (L.): comparisons of size-selective predation on four species of bivalve prey. J Shellfish Res 19:283–291Google Scholar
  23. Mathis A, Smith RJF (1993) Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). J Chem Ecol 19:1967–1979Google Scholar
  24. Morton B (1995) The population dynamics and reproductive cycle of Septifer virgatus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in an exposed rocky shore in Hong Kong. J Zool (Lond) 235:485–500Google Scholar
  25. Morton B, Morton J (1983) The sea shore ecology of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  26. Pisut DP, Pawlik JR (2002) Anti-predatory chemical defenses of ascidians: secondary metabolites or inorganic acids? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 270:203–214Google Scholar
  27. Reimer O, Harms-Ringdahl S (2001) Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator-free Baltic Sea. Mar Biol 139:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reimer O, Tedengren M (1996) Phenotypical improvement of morphological defences in the mussel, Mytilus edulis, induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens. Oikos 75:383–390Google Scholar
  29. Ruppert EE, Barnes RD (1994) Invertebrate zoology. Saunders College Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Seed R (1990a) Predator–prey relationships between the swimming crab Thalamita danae Stimpson (Decapoda: Portunidae) and the mussels Perna viridis (L.) and Brachidontes variabilis (Krauss). In: Morton B (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Marine Biological Workshop: The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and southern China. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 993–1013Google Scholar
  31. Seed R (1990b) Behavioural and mechanical aspects of predation by the swimming crab Thalamita danae on the green-lipped mussel Perna viridis. In: Barnes M, Gibson RN (eds) Trophic relationships in the marine environment. Proceedings of the 24th European Marine Biological Symposium. Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen, pp 528–540Google Scholar
  32. Seed R (1993) Invertebrate predators and their role in structuring coastal and estuarine populations of filter feeding bivalves. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 149–194Google Scholar
  33. Seelig B, Bergsrud F, Derickson R (1992) Activated carbon filtration. North Dakota State University Extension Service. Report AE-1029Google Scholar
  34. Siddall SE (1980) A clarification of the genus Perna (Mytilidae). Bull Mar Sci 30:858–870Google Scholar
  35. Smith LD, Jennings JA (2000) Induced defensive responses by the bivalve Mytilus edulis to predators with different attack modes. Mar Biol 136:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor JD (1980) Diets and habitats of shallow water predatory gastropods around Tolo Channel, Hong Kong. In: Morton B (ed) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on the Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 163–180Google Scholar
  38. Taylor JD (1996) The diets of predatory gastropods in the Cape D’Aguilar marine reserve, Hong Kong. Asian Mar Biol 13:141–166Google Scholar
  39. Tong LKY (1986) The feeding ecology of Thais clavigera and Morula musiva (Gastropoda: Muricidae) in Hong Kong. Asian Mar Biol 3:163–178Google Scholar
  40. Trussell GC (1996) Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator. Evolution 50:448–454Google Scholar
  41. Trussell GC, Smith LD (2000) Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical and geographical phenotypic change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2123–2127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Vermeij GJ (1978) Biogeography and adaptation. Harvard University Press, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
  44. Vermeij GJ (1987) Evolution and escalation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  45. Wainwright SA (1969) Stress and design in the bivalve mollusc shell. Nature 224:777–779Google Scholar
  46. Williams GA, Morritt D (1995) Habitat partitioning and thermal tolerance in a tropical limpet, Cellana grata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:89–103Google Scholar
  47. Wisenden BD, Millard MC (2001) Aquatic flatworms use chemical cues from injured conspecifics to assess predation risk and to associate risk with novel cues. Anim Behav 62:761–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. G. Cheung
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Lam
    • 1
  • Q. F. Gao
    • 1
  • K. K. Mak
    • 1
  • P. K. S. Shin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and ChemistryCity University of Hong KongKowloonPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations