Advertisement

Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 701–716 | Cite as

Investigating the interaction between internal structural changes and water sorption of MDF and OSB using X-ray computed tomography

  • Wanzhao Li
  • Jan Van den Bulcke
  • Jelle Dhaene
  • Xianxu Zhan
  • Changtong Mei
  • Joris Van Acker
Original

Abstract

Both medium density fiberboard (MDF) and oriented strand board (OSB) are increasingly used in construction, yet when exposed, water sorption can cause internal structural changes, as such decreasing mechanical strength and increasing decay risk. It is, therefore, essential to understand the interaction between structural changes and water sorption of MDF and OSB. Detailed water sorption behavior and related structural changes in two types of MDF and two types of OSB were periodically monitored using a gantry-based X-ray CT scanner. Water sorption causes local swelling in MDF, resulting in reduced swelling or even shrinkage in neighboring regions. Then again, local shrinkage can increase water resistance and possibly decrease water content locally. Obviously, local swelling results in structural changes. Such structural changes predominantly seem to appear in the transition area between high and low porosity regions. Structural changes, such as glue bonding detachment and cracking, could facilitate water intake in both MDF and OSB. For the studied T-MDF and OSB-A, the relative position of wood fibers/strands and the volume of the voids hardly changed during water sorption, which probably contributes to the decrease in water sorption along newly formed cracks and voids induced by structural changes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Stijn Willen and Mr. Pieter Vanderniepen for technical assistance. The authors also thank Norbord (www.norbord.co.eu) and Accsys Technologies (mdfosb.com.en/) for supplying the specimens. This study was financially supported by Open Found of MOE Key Laboratory of Wooden Material Science and Application (Beijing Forestry University) (No.2017KF), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20170923) and University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (17KJB220003). The special research fund of the Ghent University (BOF-UGent) is acknowledged for the financial support of the UGCT Centre of Expertise (BOF.EXP.2017.0007).

References

  1. Aro MD, Brashaw BK, Donahue PK (2014) Mechanical and physical properties of thermally modified plywood and oriented strand board panels. For Prod J 64:281–289Google Scholar
  2. Chen SG, Du CG, Wellwood R (2010) Effect of panel density on major properties of oriented strandboard. Wood Fiber Sci 42:177–184Google Scholar
  3. Dierick M, Van Loo D, Masschaele B, Van den Bulcke J, Van Acker J, Cnudde V, Van Hoorebeke L (2014) Recent micro-CT scanner developments at UGCT. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 324:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EN300 (2006) Oriented strand board (OSB)-Definitions, classification and specifications. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  5. EN317 (1993) Particleboards and fibreboards-Determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  6. Febrianto F, Sahroni Hidayat W, Bakar ES, Kwon G-J, Kwon J-H, Hong S-I, Kim N-H (2012) Properties of oriented strand board made from Betung bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper (Schultes.f) Backer ex Heyne). Wood Sci Technol 46:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ganev S, Cloutier A (2005) Mechanical properties of MDF as a function of density and moisture content. Wood Fiber Sci J Soc Wood Sci Technol 37:314–326Google Scholar
  8. Gu H, Wang S, Neimsuwan T, Wang S (2005) Comparison study of thickness swell performance of commercial oriented strandboard flooring products. For Prod J 121:139–147Google Scholar
  9. Gul W, Khan A, Shakoor A (2017) Impact of hot pressing temperature on medium density fiberboard (MDF) performance. Adv Mater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4056360 Google Scholar
  10. Li WZ, Van den Bulcke J, De Windt I, Van Loo D, Dierick M, Brabant L, Van Acker J (2013) Combining electrical resistance and 3-D X-ray computed tomography for moisture distribution measurements in wood products exposed in dynamic moisture conditions. Build Environ 67:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li WZ, Van den Bulcke J, De Schryver T, Van Acker J (2016a) Investigating water transport in MDF and OSB using a gantry-based X-ray CT scanning system. Wood Sci Technol 50:1197–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li WZ, Van Den Bulcke J, De Windt I, Dhaene J, Van Acker J (2016b) Moisture behavior and structural changes of plywood during outdoor exposure. Eur J Wood Prod 74:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Painter G, Budman H, Pritzker M (2006) Prediction of oriented strand board properties from mat formation and compression operating conditions. 2. MOE prediction and process optimization. Wood Sci Technol 40:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rathke J, Sinn G, Konnerth J, Müller U (2012) Strain measurements within fiber boards. Part I: inhomogeneous strain distribution within medium density fiberboards (MDF) loaded perpendicularly to the plane of the board. Materials 5:1115–1124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 7:676–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schnabel T, Huber H, Petutschnigg A (2017) Modelling and simulation of deformation behaviour during drying using a concept of linear difference method. Wood Sci Technol 51:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sebera V, Tippner J, Šimek M, Šrajer J, Děcký D, Klímová H (2014) Poisson’s ratio of the MDF in respect to vertical density profile. Eur J Wood Prod 72:407–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Semple KE, Zhang PK, Smith GD (2015) Hybrid oriented strand boards made from Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens Mazel) and Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.): species-separated three-layer boards. Eur J Wood Prod 73:527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Suttie E, Alexander J, Maes M (2015) Durable fibre for durable MDF—testing Tricoya. The international research group on wood protection, Viña del Mar, p IRG/WP/40704Google Scholar
  20. Taghiyari HR, Samadi YS (2016) Effects of wollastonite nanofibers on fluid flow in medium-density fiberboard. J For Res 27:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vlassenbroeck J, Dierick M, Masschaele B, Cnudde V, Van Hoorebeke L, Jacobs P (2007) Software tools for quantification of X-ray microtomography at the UGCT. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 580:442–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walker JCF (2006) Primary wood processing: principles and practice. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang S, Winistorfer PM (2003) An optical technique for determination of layer thickness swell of MDF and OSB. For Prod J 53:64–71Google Scholar
  24. Zhan TY, Lu JX, Jiang JL, Peng H, Li AX, Chang JM (2016) Viscoelastic properties of the Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) during moisture sorption processes determined by harmonic tests. Materials 9:1020.  https://doi.org/10.3390/Ma9121020 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhan TY, Lu JX, Zhang HY, Jiang JL, Peng H, Chang JM (2017) Changes of time dependent viscoelasticity of Chinese fir wood and its frequency-dependency during moisture desorption processes. Sci Silvae Sin 53:7Google Scholar
  26. Zhang Y, Jin J, Wang S (2007) Effects of resin and wax on the water uptake behavior of wood strands. Wood Fiber Sci J Soc Wood Sci Technol 39:271–278Google Scholar
  27. Zuo YF, Wu YQ, Lu JX, Liu Y (2016) Effect of process parameters on the properties of rice straw board with inorganic adhesive. J For Eng 1:7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanzhao Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Van den Bulcke
    • 3
  • Jelle Dhaene
    • 5
  • Xianxu Zhan
    • 4
  • Changtong Mei
    • 1
  • Joris Van Acker
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Materials Science and TechnologyBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.UGCT - Laboratory of Wood Technology, Department of Forest and Water Management, Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.DeHua TB New Decoration Material Co., LtdDeqingChina
  5. 5.UGCT, Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity Ghent Centre for X-ray TomographyGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations