Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Second Hip Fracture: Incidence, Trends, and Predictors

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Older persons who have suffered a hip fracture (HFx) are at increased risk of subsequent hip fractures. The cumulative incidence of a second hip fracture (SHFx) has been estimated in 8.4%; however, no studies have been carried out in our country, and the information on risk markers of SHFx is limited. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence, explore trends, and examine predictors of SHFx in a suburban population of Spain. An observational longitudinal retrospective study was performed in a universal health coverage setting (Alcorcón, 1999–2011). Data were obtained from the area hospital discharge database. Annual incidence of HFx was estimated over 100,000 population (general and persons with HFx), and median time to SHFx by Kaplan–Meier tables. Cox regression was used for the analysis of association between SHFx and baseline predictors, measured by hazard ratio (HR). Among the 3430 patients who suffered a first HFx in the study period, 255 (7.4%) experienced a SHFx (4.5% of men and 8.5% of women). Median time between the first and second HFx was 3.7 years (SD 3.2). Annual incidence of HFx in population over 45 was 290.5 per 100,000 inhabitants (131.03 in men and 433.11 in women). Annual incidence of SHFx among persons with a HFx was 956.7 per 100,000 (1052.1 in women and 595.5 in men). There was a decline trend along the study period with an annual reduction of 10.4% (95% CI 7.7–13.0%; p < 0.001) in both sexes. The following associations were found: female sex (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.97–2.02), age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), living in a nursing house (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.10–1.94), and moderate to severe liver disease (HR 4.96, 95% CI 1.23–20.06). In our environment the occurrence of a SHFx is 7.4%, three-fold risk compared to no previous HFx. Being woman, elderly, living in a nursing home, and having severe to moderate liver disease may be important predictors of a SHFx. There seems to be adequate time between the first and the SHFx for interventions that may reduce the risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker M, Johansen A (2006) Hip fracture. BMJ 333:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryg J, Rejnmark L, Overgaard S, Brixen K, Vestergaard P (2009) Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study of 169,145 cases during 1977–2001. J Bone Miner Res 24:1299–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill TW, Roy DK (2005) How many people develop fractures with what outcome? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:879–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cree M, Soskolne CL, Belseck E, Hornig J, McElhaney JE, Brant R, Suarez-Almazor M (2000) Mortality and institutionalization following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:283–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B, Kanis JA, EU Review Panel of IOF (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos 8:137 Epub 2013 Oct 11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 297:387–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huntjens KM, Kosar S, van Geel TA, Geusens PP, Willems P, Kessels A, Winkens B, Brink P, van Helden S (2010) Risk of subsequent fracture and mortality within 5 years after a non-vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 21:2075–2082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. vanStaa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C (2002) Does a fracture at one site predict later fractures at other sites? A British cohort study. Osteoporos Int 13:624–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Port L, Center J, Briffa NK, Nguyen T, Cumming R, Eisman J (2003) Osteoporotic fracture: missed opportunity for intervention. Osteoporos Int 14:780–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bliuc D, Ong CR, Eisman JA, Center JR (2005) Barriers to effective management of osteoporosis in moderate and minimal trauma fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 16:977–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisman J, Clapham S, Kehoe L, Australian BoneCare Study (2004) Osteoporosis prevalence and levels of treatment in primary care: the Australian BoneCare Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:1969–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, Johnson JA, Holroyd BH, Morrish DW, Maksymowych WP, Steiner IP, Harley CH, Wirzba BJ, Hanley DA, Blitz S, Russell AS (2004) A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med 141:366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Briancon D, de Gaudemar JB, Forestier R (2004) Management of osteoporosis in women with peripheral osteoporotic fractures after 50 years of age: a study of practices. Joint Bone Spine 71:128–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukushima T, Sudo A, Uchida A (2006) Bilateral hip fractures. J Orthop Sci 11:435–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:175–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SM, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yoon BK, Min YK, Lee DY, Park YS (2012) Prediction of survival, second fracture, and functional recovery following the first hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. Bone 50:1343–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawrence TM, Wenn R, Boulton CT, Moran CG (2010) Age-specific incidence of first and second fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:258–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lonnroos E, Kautiainen H, Karppi P, Hartikainen S, Kiviranta I, Sulkava R (2007) Incidence of second hip fractures. A population-based study. Osteoporos Int 18:1279–1285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shabat S, Gepstein R, Mann G, Kish B, Fredman B, Nyska M (2003) The second hip fracture—an analysis of 84 elderly patients. J Orthop Trauma 17:613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. vanHelden S, Cals J, Kessels F, Brink P, Dinant GJ, Geusens P (2006) Risk of new clinical fractures within 2 years following a fracture. Osteoporos Int 17:348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. vanGeel Tineke ACM, Huntjens KMB, van den Bergh Dinant GJ, Geusens PP (2010) Timing of subsequent fractures after an initial fracture. Curr Osteoporos Rep 8:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen SH, Huang KC, Tsai YH, Yang TY, Lee MS, Ueng SW, Hsu RW (2014) Risk analysis for second hip fracture in patients after hip fracture surgery: a nationwide population-based study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 15:725–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nymark T, Lauritsen JM, Ovesen O, Röck ND, Jeune B (2006) Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study. Osteoporos Int 17:1353–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen FP, Shyu YC, Fu TS, Sun CC, Chao AS, Tsai TL, Huang TS (2017) Secular trends in incidence and recurrence rates of hip fracture: a nationwide population-based study. Osteoporos Int 28:811–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsiao PC, Chen TJ, Li CY, Chu CM, Su TP, Wang SH, Pan HH, Wang KY (2015) Risk factors and incidence of repeat osteoporotic fractures among the elderly in Taiwan: a population-based cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Omsland TK, Emaus N, Tell GS, Ahmed LA, Center JR, Nguyen ND, Gjesdal CG, Forsmo S, Schei B, Søgaard AJ, Meyer HE (2013) Ten-year risk of second hip fracture. A NOREPOS study. Bone 52:493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ballane G, Cauley JA, Luckey MM, Fuleihan G (2014) Secular trends in hip fractures worldwide: opposing trends East versus West. J Bone Miner Res 29:1745–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, Melton LJ, Cummings SR, Kanis JA, IOF CSA Working Group on Fracture Epidemiology (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 22:1277–1288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu Y, Chen W, Sun T, Zhang Q, Liu S, Zhang Y (2015) Epidemiological characteristics and outcome in elderly patients sustaining non-simultaneous bilateral hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int 15:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, Eisman J, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, Kroger H, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mazzucchelli Esteban R, Perez-Fernandez E, Crespi-Villarias N, Garcia-Vadillo A, Rodriguez-Caravaca G, Gil de Miguel A, Carmona L (2017) Trends in osteoporotic hip fracture epidemiology over a 17-year period in a Spanish population: Alcorcon 1999–2015. Arch Osteoporos 12:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pueyo-Sanchez MJ, Larrosa M, Suris X, Casado E, Auleda J, Fuste J, Ortun V (2016) Secular trend in the incidence of hip fracture in Catalonia, Spain, 2003–2014. Age Ageing 46:324–328

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hawley S, Leal J, Delmestri A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK, Cooper C, Javaid MK, Judge A, REFReSH Study Group (2016) Anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions and incidence of subsequent fracture among primary hip fracture patients in england and wales: an interrupted time-series analysis. J Bone Miner Res 31:2008–2015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sogaard AJ, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Tell GS, Gjesdal CG, Emaus N, Grimnes G, Schei B, Forsmo S, Omsland TK (2016) Continued decline in hip fracture incidence in Norway: a NOREPOS study. Osteoporos Int 27:2217–2222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Giannini S, Sella S, Rossini M, Braghin D, Gatti D, Vilei MT, Amabile A, Fusaro M, Frigo AC, Sergi G, Lovato R, Nobile M, Fabris F, Adami S (2016) Declining trends in the incidence of hip fractures in people aged 65 years or over in years 2000–2011. Eur J Intern Med 35:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramón Mazzucchelli, Elia Pérez Fernández, Natalia Crespí, Alberto García-Vadillo Juan (2017) Trend in osteoporotic hip fracture epidemiology over a 17-year period in a Spanish population: Alcorcón 1999–2015. Arch Osteoporos 12:84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Azagra R, Lopez-Exposito F, Martin-Sanchez JC, Aguye A, Moreno N, Cooper C, Diez-Perez A, Dennison EM (2014) Changing trends in the epidemiology of hip fracture in Spain. Osteoporos Int 25:1267–1274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Berry SD, Samelson EJ, Hannan MT, McLean RR, Lu M, Cupples LA, Shaffer ML, Beiser AL, Kelly-Hayes M, Kiel DP (2007) Second hip fracture in older men and women: the Framingham study. Arch Intern Med 167:1971–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chiu KY, Pun WK, Luk KD, Chow SP (1992) Sequential fractures of both hips in elderly patients–a prospective study. J Trauma 32:584–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yamanashi A, Yamazaki K, Kanamori M, Mochizuki K, Okamoto S, Koide Y, Kin K, Nagano A (2005) Assessment of risk factors for second hip fractures in Japanese elderly. Osteoporos Int 16:1239–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Santos LA, Romeiro FG (2016) Diagnosis and management of cirrhosis-related osteoporosis. Biomed Res Int 2016:1423462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moll MA, Bachmann LM, Joeris A, Goldhahn J, Blauth M (2016) Parameters pointing at an increased risk for contralateral hip fractures: systematic review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 7:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Toledano Martínez E, Hernández García MA, PuñetPellise R y García Vadillo JA (2009) Instauración de tratamiento de la osteoporosis y su cumplimiento tras la fractura de cadera en el area sanitaria 2 de la Comunidad de Madrid. Reumatol Clin. 2009;5(EspecCong 1):62:62

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramón Mazzucchelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ramón Mazzucchelli, Elia Pérez-Fernández, Natalia Crespí, Alberto García-Vadillo, Gil Rodriguez Caravaca, Angel Gil de Miguel and Loreto Carmona declare no conflict of interest in relation to the study and data presented herein.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

The study was approved by the ethical committee of our hospital. Patient consent is not required by the Spanish law for study based on routine electronic data.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 109 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzucchelli, R., Pérez-Fernández, E., Crespí, N. et al. Second Hip Fracture: Incidence, Trends, and Predictors. Calcif Tissue Int 102, 619–626 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0364-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0364-2

Keywords

Navigation