Skip to main content
Log in

Individual preferences in motor coordination seen across the two hands: relations to movement stability and optimality

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis was used to explore variables related to stability of task performance in the two hands of young healthy individuals. Fourteen young adults performed four-finger accurate constant force production tasks interrupted by a voluntary quick force pulse production and by an externally imposed displacement of all fingers. Three groups of variables were used to quantify stability of steady force production: (1) indices of the inter-trial variance were computed within the UCM and orthogonal to the UCM; (2) indices of motor equivalence were computed between steady-state intervals separated by the force pulse and by the finger-lifting episode; and (3) referent coordinate and apparent stiffness were computed using the data during the ascending phase of the finger-lifting episode. In another task, the subjects performed accurate constant force production with visual feedback removal after the 8th second, and the drop in the total force after the removal was computed. There were differences between the right and left hand in some outcome variables such as variance within the UCM, and the timing of anticipatory synergy adjustments prior to the force pulse, consistent with the dynamic dominance hypothesis. There were significant correlations between the two hands for indices that were unrelated to accuracy of performance: variance within the UCM, index of motor equivalence, referent coordinate, apparent stiffness, and the drop of total force after visual feedback removal. We interpret these findings within the concept of stability–optimality trade-off. In particular, we conclude that individual subjects select particular, person-specific solutions within the spectrum allowed by the explicit task constraints, and this choice is consistent between the two hands. We conclude with a hypothesis that selecting specific solutions within the stability–optimality trade-off may represent an individual’s personal preference consistent between the two hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambike S, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2015) Processes underlying unintentional finger force changes in the absence of visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 233:711–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ambike S, Mattos D, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2016a) Synergies in the space of control variables within the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Neurosci 315:150–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ambike S, Mattos D, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2016b) Unsteady steady-states: central causes of unintentional force drift. Exp Brain Res 234:3597–3611

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesqui B, d’Avella A, Portone A, Lacquaniti F (2012) Catching a ball at the right time and place: individual factors matter. PLoS One 7(2):e31770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M, Kato M, Tseng CH (2017) Gender and autistic traits modulate implicit motor synchrony. PLoS One 12(9):e0184083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Curioni A, Minio-Paluello I, Sacheli LM, Candidi M, Aglioti SM (2017) Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior. Mol Autism 8:23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas PB, Freitas SMSF, Lewis MM, Huang X, Latash ML (2018) Stability of steady hand force production explored across spaces and methods of analysis. Exp Brain Res 236:1545–1562

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Ivry RB (2010) The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn Sci 14:31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG (2015) Referent control of action and perception: challenging conventional theories in behavioral science. Springer, NY, p 244

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Latash ML (1998) On the problem of adequate language in movement science. Mot Control 2:306–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haar S, Dinstein I, Shelef I, Donchin O (2017a) Effector-invariant movement encoding in the human motor system. J Neurosci 37:9054–9063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haar S, Donchin O, Dinstein I (2017b) Individual movement variability magnitudes are explained by cortical neural variability. J Neurosci 37:9076–9085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JM, Best CS, Moffat VJ, Spencer MD, Philip RC, Power MJ, Johnstone EC (2008) Autistic traits and cognitive performance in young people with mild intellectual impairment. J Autism Dev Disord 38:1241–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jo HJ, Park J, Lewis MM, Huang X, Latash ML (2015) Prehension synergies and hand function in early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 233:425–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jo HJ, Lucassen E, Huang X, Latash ML (2017) Changes in multi-digit synergies and their feed-forward adjustments in multiple sclerosis. J Mot Behav 49:218–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2010) Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Mot Control 14:294–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2012) The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy). Exp Brain Res 217:1–5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2016) Towards physics of neural processes and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 69:136–146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2017) Biological movement and laws of physics. Mot Control 21:327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Anson JG (1996) What are normal movements in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci 19:55–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Huang X (2015) Neural control of movement stability: lessons from studies of neurological patients. Neurosci 301:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2002) Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 146:412–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MM, Lee E-Y, Jo HJ, Park J, Latash ML, Huang X (2016) Synergy as a new and sensitive marker of basal ganglia dysfunction: a study of asymptomatic welders. Neurotoxicology 56:76–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lingam R, Golding J, Jongmans MJ, Hunt LP, Ellis M, Emond A (2010) The association between developmental coordination disorder and other developmental traits. Pediatrics 126(5):e1109–e1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JR, Budgeon MK, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2011) Stabilization of the total force in multi-finger pressing tasks studied with the ‘inverse piano’ technique. Hum Move Sci 30:446–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattos D, Latash ML, Park E, Kuhl J, Scholz JP (2011) Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence. J Neurophysiol 106:1424–1436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mattos D, Schöner G, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2015) Motor equivalence during accurate multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 233:487–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LE, Saygin AP (2013) Individual differences in the perception of biological motion: links to social cognition and motor imagery. Cognition 128:140–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller H, Sternad D (2003) A randomization method for the calculation of covariation in multiple nonlinear relations: illustrated with the example of goal-directed movements. Biol Cybern 89:22–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Carlton LG (1993) Force variability in isometric responses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olafsdottir H, Yoshida N, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) Anticipatory covariation of finger forces during self-paced and reaction time force production. Neurosci Lett 381:92–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2010) Optimality vs. variability: an example of multi-finger redundant tasks. Exp Brain Res 207:119–132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Wu Y-H, Lewis MM, Huang X, Latash ML (2012) Changes in multi-finger interaction and coordination in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurophysiol 108:915–924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parsa B, O’Shea DJ, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2016) On the nature of unintentional action: a study of force/moment drifts during multi-finger tasks. J Neurophysiol 116:698–708

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosini L, Cutuli D, Picerni E, Laricchiuta D (2015) Cerebellum and personality traits. Cerebellum 14:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picerni E, Petrosini L, Piras F, Laricchiuta D, Cutuli D, Chiapponi C, Fagioli S, Girardi P, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G (2013) New evidence for the cerebellar involvement in personality traits. Front Behav Neurosci 7:133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Prilutsky BI, Zatsiorsky VM (2002) Optimization-based models of muscle coordination. Exer Sport Sci Rev 30:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschechtko S, Latash ML (2017) Stability of hand force production: I. Hand level control variables and multi-finger synergies. J Neurophysiol 118:3152–3164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reschechtko S, Latash ML (2018) Stability of hand force production: II. Ascending and descending synergies. J Neurophysiol 120:1045–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reschechtko S, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2017) The synergic control of multi-finger force production: stability of explicit and implicit task components. Exp Brain Res 235:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142:241–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL (2005) Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 33:206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schöner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schöner G (1995) Recent developments and problems in human movement science and their conceptual implications. Ecol Psychol 8:291–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK, Olafsdottir H, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) The emergence and disappearance of multi-digit synergies during force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 164:260–270

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006) The generalization of perceptual-motor intra-individual variability in young and old adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 6:P304–P310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7:907–915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM (2002) Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res 145:275–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Sainburg RL (2007) The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Exp Brain Res 178:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaback M, Cleworth TW, Carpenter MG, Adkin AL (2015) Personality traits and individual differences predict threat-induced changes in postural control. Hum Mov Sci 40:393–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Sainburg RL, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2006) Hand dominance and multi-finger synergies. Neurosci Lett 409:200–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was in part supported by NIH Grants NS082151 and NS095873.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Latash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Freitas, P.B., Freitas, S.M.S.F., Lewis, M.M. et al. Individual preferences in motor coordination seen across the two hands: relations to movement stability and optimality. Exp Brain Res 237, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5393-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5393-1

Keywords

Navigation