Abstract
When reaching to grasp for an object in the absence of obstacles, the choice of contact points is highly consistent within and between healthy humans, suggesting a preplanning of grasping movements (Gilster et al. in Exp Brain Res 217:137–151, 2012). In real life, objects may obstruct the favored contact points at a target object, requiring adjustments to avoid collision. In the present study, we investigated how an obstacle that directly obstructs the favored contact points for two-digit grasping changes the planning and execution of reach-to-grasp movements. Furthermore, we elucidated to what extent an obstacle placed at various angular positions around the target object (thereby not directly obstructing the favored contact points) still influences trajectories, contact points, and time-related parameters. When obstacles directly obstructed favored contact points participants either chose a completely new contact point or grasped the object only slightly away from the favored contact point. Obstacles located near the favored contact points but not directly obstructing them still resulted in a repulsive effect, meaning that contact points were shifted away from the obstacle to ensure sufficient distance to the obstacle. We found that the position of an obstacle even influences the direction in which the fingers set off. This leads to a deviation of the trajectory very early in the time course, yielding longer movement times if the main contact points are obstructed. Taken together, the early significant influence of obstacles on the grasping movement supports the assumption that grasping movements are preplanned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Craje C, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B (2008) The effect of the “rod-and-frame” illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task. Exp Brain Res 185:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1130-x
Cuijpers RH, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2004) On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. J Neurophysiol 91:2598–2606. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00644.2003
Gilster R, Hesse C, Deubel H (2012) Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects. Exp Brain Res 217:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2980-9
Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bulthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI (1994) Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4:604–610
Hesse C, De Grave DDJ, Franz VH, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2008) Planning movements well in advance. Cognit Neuropsychol 25:985–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701862399
Huber M, Su YH, Kruger M, Faschian K, Glasauer S, Hermsdorfer J (2014) Adjustments of speed and path when avoiding collisions with another pedestrian. PLoS One 9:e89589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089589
Lederman SJ, Wing AM (2003) Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry. Exp Brain Res 152:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1522-5
Milgram P (1987) A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 19:449–456. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205613
Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR, Coppard VL, Carson RG (2001) The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 137:497–501
Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234
Peacock JA (1983) Two-dimensional goodness-of-fit testing in astronomy. Mon Not R Astron Soc 202:615–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/202.3.615
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1996) Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge university press, Cambridge
Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J, Barnes HJ, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18:1058–1073
Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE (1996) From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) 94:59–85
Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RJ, Vaughan J, Jansen C (2001) Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 108:709–734
Schot WD, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2010) Posture of the arm when grasping spheres to place them elsewhere. Exp Brain Res 204:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2261-z
Tresilian JR (1998) Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension. Exp Brain Res 120:352–368
Voudouris D, Brenner E, Schot WD, Smeets JBJ (2010) Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points? Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung Experimentation Cerebrale 206:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2382-4
Voudouris D, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2012) Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points? Hum Mov Sci 31:1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.01.005
Voudouris D, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2013) Ultra-fast selection of grasping points. J Neurophysiol 110:1484–1489. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00066.2013
Zhang W, Rosenbaum DA (2008) Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction. Exp Brain Res 184:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1106-x
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GI 964/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garzorz, I.T., Knorr, A.G., Gilster, R. et al. The influence of obstacles on grasp planning. Exp Brain Res 236, 2639–2648 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5321-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5321-4