Adaptive threshold hunting for the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex inhibition

  • Ronan A. Mooney
  • John Cirillo
  • Winston D. Byblow
Research Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Primary motor cortex excitability can be modulated by anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). These neuromodulatory effects may, in part, be dependent on modulation within gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory networks. GABAergic function can be quantified non-invasively using adaptive threshold hunting paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The previous studies have used TMS with posterior–anterior (PA) induced current to assess tDCS effects on inhibition. However, TMS with anterior–posterior (AP) induced current in the brain provides a more robust measure of GABA-mediated inhibition. The aim of the present study was to assess the modulation of corticomotor excitability and inhibition after anodal and cathodal tDCS using TMS with PA- and AP-induced current. In 16 young adults (26 ± 1 years), we investigated the response to anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS in a repeated-measures double-blinded crossover design. Adaptive threshold hunting paired-pulse TMS with PA- and AP-induced current was used to examine separate interneuronal populations within M1 and their influence on corticomotor excitability and short- and long-interval inhibition (SICI and LICI) for up to 60 min after tDCS. Unexpectedly, cathodal tDCS increased corticomotor excitability assessed with AP (P = 0.047) but not PA stimulation (P = 0.74). SICIAP was reduced after anodal tDCS compared with sham (P = 0.040). Pearson’s correlations indicated that SICIAP and LICIAP modulation was associated with corticomotor excitability after anodal (P = 0.027) and cathodal tDCS (P = 0.042). The after-effects of tDCS on corticomotor excitability may depend on the direction of the TMS-induced current used to make assessments, and on modulation within GABA-mediated inhibitory circuits.

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation Transcranial direct current stimulation Adaptive threshold hunting Intracortical inhibition Current direction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank April Ren for the assistance with data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amandusson Å, Flink R, Axelson HW (2017) Comparison between adaptive and fixed stimulus paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) in normal subjects. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2:91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammann C, Lindquist MA, Celnik PA (2017) Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions. Brain Stimul 10:757–763.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Antal A, Terney D, Kuhnl S, Paulus W (2010) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:890–903.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonenko D et al (2017) tDCS-induced modulation of GABA levels and resting-state functional connectivity in older adults. J Neurosci 37:4065–4073.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0079-17.2017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Awiszus F (2003) TMS and threshold hunting. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 56:13–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Awiszus F, Borckardt JJ (2011) TMS motor threshold assessment tool (MTAT 2.0). http://www.clinicalresearcher.org/software.htm
  7. Awiszus F, Feistner H, Urbach D, Bostock H (1999) Characterisation of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation conditions yielding intracortical inhibition or I-wave facilitation using a threshold-hunting paradigm. Exp Brain Res 129:317–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bachtiar V, Near J, Johansen-Berg H, Stagg CJ (2015) Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Elife.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartlett JW, Frost C (2008) Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:466–475.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5256 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA (2013) Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol Lond 591:1987–2000.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 86:127–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cirillo J, Byblow WD (2016) Threshold tracking primary motor cortex inhibition: the influence of current direction. Eur J Neurosci.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13369 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cirillo J, Lavender AP, Ridding MC, Semmler JG (2009) Motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation is enhanced in physically active individuals. J Physiol 587:5831–5842.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181834 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Darling WG, Wolf SL, Butler AJ (2006) Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation. Exp Brain Res 174:376–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Lazzaro V, Ziemann U (2013) The contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the functional evaluation of microcircuits in human motor cortex. Front Neural Circ 7:18.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2013.00018 Google Scholar
  16. Di Lazzaro V et al (1998) Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 119:265–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Lazzaro V et al (2001) The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 138:268–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Lazzaro V et al (2013) Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on the excitability of corticospinal axons of the human cerebral cortex. Brain Stimul 6:641–643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujiyama H, Hyde J, Hinder MR, Kim SJ, McCormack GH, Vickers JC, Summers JJ (2014) Delayed plastic responses to anodal tDCS in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci 6:115.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00115 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117:845–850.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamada M, Murase N, Hasan A, Balaratnam M, Rothwell JC (2013) The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex 23:1593–1605.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs147 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heise KF, Niehoff M, Feldheim JF, Liuzzi G, Gerloff C, Hummel FC (2014) Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age. Front Aging Neurosci 6:146.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00146 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hordacre B, Moezzi B, Goldsworthy MR, Rogasch NC, Graetz LJ, Ridding MC (2017) Resting state functional connectivity measures correlate with the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 45:837–845.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13508 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ilić TV, Meintzschel F, Cleff U, Ruge D, Kessler KR, Ziemann U (2002) Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity. J Physiol 545:153–167.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.030122 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Keel JC, Smith MJ, Wassermann EM (2001) A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 112:720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kidgell DJ, Goodwill AM, Frazer AK, Daly RM (2013) Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. BMC Neurosci 14:64.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-64 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiers L, Cros D, Chiappa KH, Fang J (1993) Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89:415–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kronberg G, Bridi M, Abel T, Bikson M, Parra LC (2017) Direct current stimulation modulates LTP and LTD: activity dependence and dendritic effects. Brain Stimul 10:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kujirai T et al (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:501–519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuo HI, Bikson M, Datta A, Minhas P, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA (2013) Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul 6:644–648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopez-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Rio-Rodriguez D, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M (2014) Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul 7:372–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lopez-Alonso V, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M, Costantini A, Gonzalez-Henriquez JJ, Cheeran B (2015) Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 126:2342–2347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McCambridge AB, Stinear JW, Byblow WD (2015) ‘I-wave’ recruitment determines response to tDCS in the upper limb, but only so far. Brain Stimul 8:1124–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonnell MN, Orekhov Y, Ziemann U (2006) The role of GABA(B) receptors in intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 173:86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0365-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mooney RA, Cirillo J, Byblow WD (2017) GABA and primary motor cortex inhibition in young and older adults: a multimodal reliability study. J Neurophysiol 118:425–433.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00199.2017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakamura H, Kitagawa H, Kawaguchi Y, Tsuji H (1997) Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans. J Physiol 498(Pt 3):817–823CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(Pt 3):633–639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57:1899–1901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nitsche MA et al (2003a) Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol 553:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W (2003b) Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 114:600–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nitsche MA et al (2004) GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19:2720–2726.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03398.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nitsche MA et al (2005) Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 568:291–303.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Radman T, Ramos RL, Brumberg JC, Bikson M (2009) Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro. Brain Stimul 2:215–228, 228e.211–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rahman A, Reato D, Arlotti M, Gasca F, Datta A, Parra LC, Bikson M (2013) Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J Physiol 591:2563–2578.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Rom DM (1990) A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni Inequality. Biometrika 77:663–665.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/77.3.663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sakai K, Ugawa Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Furubayashi T, Kanazawa I (1997) Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. Exp Brain Res 113:24–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sale MV, Ridding MC, Nordstrom MA (2008) Cortisol inhibits neuroplasticity induction in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 28:8285–8293.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1963-08.2008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sale MV, Lavender AP, Opie GM, Nordstrom MA, Semmler JG (2015) Increased intracortical inhibition in elderly adults with anterior–posterior current flow: a TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.062 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sasaki R, Miyaguchi S, Kotan S, Kojima S, Kirimoto H, Onishi H (2016) Modulation of cortical inhibitory circuits after cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Front Hum Neurosci 10:30.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00030 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuck P, Zwingmann C (2003) The ‘smallest real difference’ as a measure of sensitivity to change: a critical analysis. Int J Rehabil Res 26:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mrr.0000070759.63544.65 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Silbert BI, Patterson HI, Pevcic DD, Windnagel KA, Thickbroom GW (2013) A comparison of relative-frequency and threshold-hunting methods to determine stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 124:708–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith MJ, Keel JC, Greenberg BD, Adams LF, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DA, Wassermann EM (1999) Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability. Neurology 53:2069–2072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Stagg CJ et al (2014) Local GABA concentration is related to network-level resting functional connectivity. Elife 3:e01465.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01465 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Stinear CM, Petoe MA, Byblow WD (2015) Primary motor cortex excitability during recovery after stroke: implications for neuromodulation. Brain Stimul.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.015 Google Scholar
  55. Terwee CB et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tremblay S, Beaule V, Lepage JF, Theoret H (2013) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates GABAB-related intracortical inhibition in the M1 of healthy individuals. Neuroreport 24:46–50.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c36b8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tremblay S, Larochelle-Brunet F, Lafleur LP, El Mouderrib S, Lepage JF, Theoret H (2016) Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability. Eur J Neurosci 44:2184–2190.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13321 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Valls-Sole J, Pascual-Leone A, Wassermann EM, Hallett M (1992) Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85:355–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Veale JF (2014) Edinburgh Handedness Inventory—short Form: a revised version based on. confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality 19:164–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC (2014) Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul 7:468–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang X, Woolley DG, Swinnen SP, Feys H, Meesen R, Wenderoth N (2014) Changes in corticomotor excitability and intracortical inhibition of the primary motor cortex forearm area induced by anodal tDCS. PLoS One 9:e101496.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101496 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W (1996) Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol 40:367–378.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400306 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zoghi M, Pearce SL, Nordstrom MA (2003) Differential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective activation of an intrinsic hand muscle. J Physiol 550:933–946.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042606 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronan A. Mooney
    • 1
  • John Cirillo
    • 1
  • Winston D. Byblow
    • 1
  1. 1.Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, Centre for Brain ResearchThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations