Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 267, Issue 1, pp 265–277 | Cite as

Self-Organized Forest-Fires Near the Critical Time

  • J. van den BergEmail author
  • R. Brouwer
Article

Abstract

We consider a forest-fire model which, somewhat informally, is described as follows: Each site (vertex) of the square lattice is either vacant or occupied by a tree. Vacant sites become occupied at rate 1. Further, each site is hit by lightning at rate λ. This lightning instantaneously destroys (makes vacant) the occupied cluster of the site.

This model is closely related to the Drossel-Schwabl forest-fire model, which has received much attention in the physics literature. The most interesting behaviour seems to occur when the lightning rate goes to zero. In the physics literature it is believed that then the system has so-called self-organized critical behaviour.

We let the system start with all sites vacant and study, for positive but small λ, the behaviour near the ‘critical time’ t c , defined by the relation 1 − exp(− t c ) = p c , the critical probability for site percolation.

Intuitively one might expect that if, for fixed t > t c , we let simultaneously λ tend to 0 and m to ∞, the probability that some tree at distance smaller than m from O is burnt before time t goes to 1. However, we show that under a percolation-like assumption (which we can not prove but believe to be true) this intuition is false. We compare with the case where the square lattice is replaced by the directed binary tree, and pose some natural open problems.

Keywords

Critical Time Vacant Site Physics Literature Intuitive Reasoning Site Percolation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van den Berg J., Járai A.A. (2004) On the asymptotic density in a one-dimensional self-organized critical forest-fire model. Commun. Math. Phys. 253, 633–644CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van den Berg, J., Brouwer, R. Self-destructive percolation. Random Structures and Algorithms 24, Issue 4, 480–501 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drossel B., Schwabl F. (1992) Self-organized critical forest-fire model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1629–1632CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dürre, M. Existence of multi-dimensional infinite volume self-organized critical forest-fire models. Preprint (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grassberger P. (2002) Critical behaviour of the Drossel-Schwabl forest fire model. New J. Phys. 4, 17.1–17.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimmett G.R. (1999) Percolation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen H.J. (1998) Self-Organized Criticality, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malamud B.D., Morein G., Turcotte D.L. (1998) Forest Fires: An example of self-organized critical behaviour. Science 281, 1840–1841CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schenk K., Drossel B., Schwabl F. Self-organised critical forest-fire model on large scales. Phys. Revi. E 65, 026135-1-8 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CWIAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations