Abstract
Gauge fields have a natural metric interpretation in terms of horizontal distance. The latest, also called Carnot-Carathéodory or subriemannian distance, is by definition the length of the shortest horizontal path between points, that is to say the shortest path whose tangent vector is everywhere horizontal with respect to the gauge connection. In noncommutative geometry all the metric information is encoded within the Dirac operator D. In the classical case, i.e. commutative, Connes’s distance formula allows to extract from D the geodesic distance on a riemannian spin manifold. In the case of a gauge theory with a gauge field A, the geometry of the associated U(n)-vector bundle is described by the covariant Dirac operator D+A. What is the distance encoded within this operator? It was expected that the noncommutative geometry distance d defined by a covariant Dirac operator was intimately linked to the Carnot-Carathéodory distance dh defined by A. In this paper we make precise this link, showing that the equality of d and d H strongly depends on the holonomy of the connection. Quite interestingly we exhibit an elementary example, based on a 2 torus, in which the noncommutative distance has a very simple expression and simultaneously avoids the main drawbacks of the riemannian metric (no discontinuity of the derivative of the distance function at the cut-locus) and of the subriemannian one (memory of the structure of the fiber).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chamseddine A.H., Connes A. (1996). The Spectral Action Principle. Commun. Math. Phys. 186:737–750
Connes A. (1994). Noncommutative geometry. Academic Press, London-New York
Connes A. (1996). Gravity Coupled with Matter and the Foundation of Noncommutative Geometry. Commun. Math. Phys. 182:155–176
Connes A., Lott J. (1992). The metric aspect of noncommutative geometry. In: Fröhlich J. et al. (eds) Proceedings of 1991 Cargèse summer conference. Plenum, New York
Doubrovine D., Novikov S., Fomenko A. (1982). Géométrie contemporaine, méthodes et applications. Mir, Moscow
Iochum B., Krajewski T., Martinetti P. (2001). Distance in finite spaces from non commutative geometry. J. Geom. Phys. 37:100–125
Kadison R.V. (1983). Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras. Academic Press, London-New York
Kastler D., Testard D. (1993). Quantum forms of tensor products. Commun. Math. Phys. 155:135–142
Kobayashi S., Nomizu K. (1963). Foundations of differential geometry. Interscience, New York
Lang S. (1995). Algebra. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Lazzarini S., Schucker T. (2001). A Farewell To Unimodularity. Phys. Lett. B510:277–284
Lichnerowicz A. (1962). Théorie globale des connexions et des groupes d’holonomie. Edizioni Cremonese, Rome
Martinetti P., Wulkenhaar R. (2002). Discrete Kaluza Klein from scalar fluctuations in non commutative geometry. J. Math. Phys. 43:182–204
Montgomery R. (2002). A tour of subriemannian geometries, their geodesics and applications. AMS, Providence, RI
Schelp, R.: Fermion masses in noncommutative geometry. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B14, 2477–2484, (2000); Martinetti, P.: A brief introduction to the noncommutative geometry description of particle physics standard model. http:arxiv.org/list/math-ph/0306046
Vanhecke F.J. (1999). On the product of real spectral triples. Lett. Math. Phys. 50(2):157–162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Connes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinetti, P. Carnot-Carathéodory Metric and Gauge Fluctuation in Noncommutative Geometry. Commun. Math. Phys. 265, 585–616 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-0001-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-0001-9