Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 29, pp 7749–7764 | Cite as

High-affinity graphene oxide-encapsulated magnetic Zr-MOF for pretreatment and rapid determination of the photosensitizers hematoporphyrin and hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether in human urine prior to UPLC-HRMS

  • Xin Hua
  • Guosheng Gao
  • Shengdong PanEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

In this paper, a high-affinity graphene oxide-encapsulated magnetic Zr-MOF (GO-Mag@Zr-MOF) was synthesized and characterized by SEM, TEM, and XPS for its morphology, structure, and components. Subsequently, the as-prepared GO-Mag@Zr-MOF was, for the first time, employed as magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) adsorbent for pretreatment and determination of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with the photosensitizers hematoporphyrin (Hp) and hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME) in human urine samples coupled with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS). The synthesized GO-Mag@Zr-MOF revealed excellent adsorption efficiency for Hp and HMME in urine samples. Under optimal conditions, the spiked recoveries of the developed method were in the range of 89.5–105.6% with RSDs less than 10%. The limits of detection (LODs) were found to be 0.036 and 0.042 μg/L for Hp and HMME, respectively, while limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 0.12 and 0.14 μg/L. The proposed method was found to be rapid, effective, sensitive, and accurate for clinical analysis. Moreover, this paper, for the first time, carefully expounded the mass spectrum cracking mechanisms of Hp and HMME.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Graphene oxide-encapsulated magnetic Zr-MOF (GO-Mag@Zr-MOF) UPLC-HRMS Hematoporphyrin Hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether Human urine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LQ19B050001), Ningbo Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 2018A610404, No. 2016A610178), Ningbo Municipal Program for Leading and Top-Notch Talents, Zhejiang Provincial Program for Public Welfare of Technology Application Research Plan (No. 2015C31148), and the Opening Foundation of Key Laboratory of Emergency Detection for Public Health of Zhejiang Province for their financial support of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed consents were obtained from three volunteers who donated urine samples. This was not a medical study in any form. Urine samples were used to optimize liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of Hp and HMME.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Brozek-Pluska B, Kopec M. Raman microspectroscopy of hematoporphyrins. Imaging of the noncancerous and the cancerous human breast tissues with photosensitizers. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2016;169:182–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tian ZD, Quan XM, Xu CS, Dan L, Guo H, Leung WN. Hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether enhances the killing action of ultrasound on osteosarcoma in vivo. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sibille A, Lambert R, Souquet JC, Sabben G, Descos F. Long-term survival after photodynamic therapy for esophageal cancer. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(2):337–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang J, Shen H, Jin H, Lou Q, Zhang X. Treatment of unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using hematoporphyrin photodynamic therapy: a prospective study. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2016;16:110–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tang Y, Xie H, Li J, Jian D. The association between treatment reactions and treatment efficiency of Hemoporfin-photodynamic therapy on port wine stains: a prospective double blind randomized controlled trial. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2017;18:171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y, Zuo Z, Liao X, Gu Y, Qiu H, Zeng J. Investigation of photodynamic therapy optimization for port wine stain using modulation of photosensitizer administration methods. Exp Biol Med. 2013;238(12):1344–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qin ZP, Li KL, Ren L, Liu XJ. Photodynamic therapy of port wine stains-a report of 238 cases. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2007;4(1):53–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiu H, Gu Y, Wang Y, Huang N. Twenty years of clinical experience with a new modality of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for port wine stains. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertoloni G, Lauro FM, Cortella G, Merchat M. Photosensitizing activity of hematoporphyrin on staphylococcus aureus cells. BBA-Gen Subjects. 2000;1475(2):169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aharon D, Weitman H, Ehrenberg B. The effect of liposomes’ surface electric potential on the uptake of hematoporphyrin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808(8):2031–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCaughan JS, Mertens BF, Cho C, Barabash RD, Payton HW. Photodynamic therapy to treat tumors of the extrahepatic biliary ducts. A case report. Arch Surg. 1991;126(1):111–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao Y, Tu P, Zhou G, Zhou Z, Lin X, Yang H, et al. Hemoporfin photodynamic therapy for port-wine stain: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0156219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klein A, Baumler W, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Laser and IPL treatment of port-wine stains: therapy options, limitations, and practical aspects. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(6):845–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gasco MR, Trotta M. Determination of hematoporphyrin and protoporphyrin by ion-pair extraction with chlorpromazine. J Pharm Sci. 1981;70(11):1294–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan EN, Goodall DM. Capillary electrophoresis analysis of polyhaematoporphyrin, a photosensitizer used in photodynamic therapy. J Chromatogr A. 1993;636(1):171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Houle JM, Strong A. Clinical pharmacokinetics of verteporfin. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42(5):547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen Z, Song T, Chen X, Wang S, Chen J. Study on the interaction between hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether and DNA and the determination of hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether using the resonance light scattering technique. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2010;77(3):605–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ackroyd R, Brown N, Vernon D, Roberts D, Stephenson T, Marcus S, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic acid photosensitization of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a pharmacokinetic study. Photochem Photobiol. 1999;70(4):656–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li P, Sun JG, Huang CR, Pan GY, Xu MJ, Li J, et al. Development and validation of a sensitive quantification method for hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006;20(12):1277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koster RA, Alffenaar J-WC, Greijdanus B, VanDerNagel JE, Uges DR. Application of sweat patch screening for 16 drugs and metabolites using a fast and highly selective LC-MS/MS method. Ther Drug Monit. 2014;36(1):35–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoff RB, Rübensam G, Jank L, Barreto F, Peralba MCR, Pizzolato TM, et al. Analytical quality assurance in veterinary drug residue analysis methods: matrix effects determination and monitoring for sulfonamides analysis. Talanta. 2015;132:443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montesano C, Simeoni MC, Curini R, Sergi M, Sterzo CL, Compagnone D. Determination of illicit drugs and metabolites in oral fluid by microextraction on packed sorbent coupled with LC-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407(13):3647–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soleimani M, Ahmadi M, Madrakian T, Afkhami A. Magnetic solid phase extraction of rizatriptan in human urine samples prior to its spectrofluorimetric determination. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2018;254:1225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng G, Liu Y-L, Wang Z-G, Zhang J-L, Sun D-H, Ni J-Z. The GO/rGO–Fe3O4 composites with good water-dispersibility and fast magnetic response for effective immobilization and enrichment of biomolecules. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(41):21998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng G, Wang ZG, Liu YL, Zhang JL, Sun DH, Ni JZ. A graphene-based multifunctional affinity probe for selective capture and sequential identification of different biomarkers from biosamples. Chem Commun. 2012;48(82):10240–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Amiri A, Saadati-Moshtaghin HR, Zonoz FM, Targhoo A. Preparation and characterization of magnetic Wells-Dawson heteropoly acid nanoparticles for magnetic solid-phase extraction of aromatic amines in water samples. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1483:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sorribas S, Zornoza B, Serra-Crespo P, Gascon J, Kapteijn F, Téllez C, et al. Synthesis and gas adsorption properties of mesoporous silica-NH2-MIL-53(Al) core–shell spheres. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016;225:116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wan H, Chen C, Wu Z, Que Y, Feng Y, Wang W, et al. Encapsulation of heteropolyanion-based ionic liquid within the metal–organic framework MIL-100(Fe) for biodiesel production. ChemCatChem. 2015;7(3):441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qu Q, Gao T, Zheng H, Li X, Liu H, Shen M, et al. Graphene oxides-guided growth of ultrafine Co3O4 nanocrystallites from MOFs as high-performance anode of Li-ion batteries. Carbon. 2015;92:119–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ban Y, Li Z, Li Y, Peng Y, Jin H, Jiao W, et al. Confinement of ionic liquids in nanocages: tailoring the molecular sieving properties of ZIF-8 for membrane-based CO2 capture. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;127(51):15703–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmed I, Panja T, Khan NA, Sarker M, Yu JS, Jhung SH. Nitrogen-doped porous carbons from ionic liquids@MOF: remarkable adsorbents for both aqueous and nonaqueous media. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(11):10276–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cheng G, Wang ZG, Denagamage S, Zheng SY. Graphene-templated synthesis of magnetic metal organic framework nanocomposites for selective enrichment of biomolecules. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(16):10234–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    He Z, Liu D, Li R, Zhou Z, Wang P. Magnetic solid-phase extraction of sulfonylurea herbicides in environmental water samples by Fe3O4@dioctadecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride@silica magnetic particles. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;747(1):29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li B, Liu Z, Han C, Wei M, Zhao S. In situ synthesis, characterization, and catalytic performance of tungstophosphoric acid encapsulated into the framework of mesoporous silica pillared clay. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;377(1):334–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical LaboratoryNingboChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Health Risk Appraisal for Trace Toxic Chemicals of Zhejiang ProvinceNingbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and PreventionNingboChina

Personalised recommendations