Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 29, pp 7645–7653 | Cite as

Photoelectrochemical immunoassay of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 via plasmon-enhanced energy transfer between gold nanoparticles and CdS QDs/g-C3N4

  • Dong-Ping Zhang
  • Ling-E Wang
  • Xiao-Ying Liu
  • Zhi-Hua Luo
  • Lei Zheng
  • Yun He
  • Bo ZhangEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

A facile and feasible photoelectrochemical (PEC) immunoassay based on plasmon-enhanced energy transfer between gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and CdS quantum dots (QDs)/g-C3N4 nanosheets was developed for the ultrasensitive detection of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2). To construct such a sensing platform, the immunosensor was prepared by immobilizing Lp-PLA2 on a CdS QDs/g-C3N4-modified electrode. A competitive-type immunoreaction was utilized for Lp-PLA2 detection, with AuNP-labeled anti-Lp-PLA2 antibody used as the competitor. Introducing AuNPs with the specific antibody for the antigen target Lp-PLA2 led to heavy quenching of the photocurrent of CdS QDs/g-C3N4 due to the plasmon-enhanced energy transfer between AuNPs and CdS QDs. The quenching efficiency decreased with increasing target Lp-PLA2 concentration. Under optimal conditions, the PEC immunosensor presented a good photocurrent response to the target Lp-PLA2 in the dynamic linear range of 0.01–300 ng mL−1, with a low detection limit of 5.3 pg mL−1. Other biomarkers and natural enzymes did not interfere with response of this system. The reproducibility and accuracy of this method for the analysis of human serum specimens were evaluated, and the results given by the method developed here were found to closely correspond to the results obtained with commercial Lp-PLA2 ELISA kits. Importantly, this protocol offers promise for the development of exciton–plasmon interaction-based PEC detection systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Photoelectrochemical immunosensor Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 Gold nanoparticles Exciton–plasmon interaction CdS quantum dots/g-C3N4 

Notes

Funding information

Support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos.: 81100149, 81470300, and 81301518) is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were approved by the Xinqiao Hospital of The Army Medical University and Chonggang General Hospital, and were implemented in accordance with the ethical standards of the Xinqiao Hospital of The Army Medical University and the Chonggang General Hospital ethics committees, as well as with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all of the participants who were included in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1375_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (556 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 555 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gianfredi V, Salvatori T, Nucci D, Villarini M, Moretti M. Can chocolate consumption reduce cardo-cerebrovascular risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition. 2018;46:103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hou C, Ji X. Research progress on mechanisms of ischemic conditioning in cardio-cerebrovascular system. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;12:380–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu L, Wang S, Li J. The predictive role of the retinal vascular changes for the cardio-cerebrovascular disease. Ophthalmol China. 2010;19:361–3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tjoelker L, Wilder C, Stafforini D, Dietsch G, Schimpf B, Hooper S, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of a platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase. Nature. 1995;374:549–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moise L, Marta D, Rascu A, Moldoveanu E. Serum lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in males with metabolic syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea. Acta Endocinol. 2018;14:36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Topbas C, Swick A, Razavi M, Anderson N, Pearson T, Bystrom C. Measurement of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 by use of 3 different methods: exploration of discordance between ELISA and activity assays. Clin Chem. 2018;64:697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhuo S, Wolfert R, Yuan C. Biochemical differences in the mass and activity tests of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 explain the discordance in results between the two assay methods. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:1209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shu J, Tang D. Current advances in quantum-dots-based photoelectrochemical immunoassays. Chem Asian J. 2017;12:2780–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shu J, Qiu Z, Lv S, Zhang K, Tang D. Plasmonic-enhancement coupling with defect-engineered TiO2−x: a mode for sensitive photoelectrochemical biosensing. Anal Chem. 2018;90:2425–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baş D, Boyaci IH. Photoelectrochemical competitive DNA hybridization assay using semiconductor quantum dot conjugated oligonucleotides. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400:703–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qiu Z, Shu J, Tang D. Near-infrared-to-ultraviolet light-mediated photoelectrochemical aptasensing platform for cancer biomarker based on core-shell NaYF4:Yb,Tm@TiO2 upconversion microrods. Anal Chem. 2018;90:1021–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou Q, Lin Y, Zhang K, Li M, Tang D. Reduced graphene oxide/BiFeO3 nanohybrids-based signal-on photoelectrochemical sensing system for prostate-specific antigen detection coupling with magnetic microfluidic device. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;101:146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jia S, Zhu B, Guo L. Detection and mechanistic investigation of halogenated benzoquinone induced DNA damage by photoelectrochemical DNA sensor. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397:2395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao E, Lin W, Sun M, Liang W, Song Y. Exciton–plasmon coupling interactions: from principle to applications. Nano. 2018;7:145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dong Y, Cao J, Wang B, Ma S, Liu Y. Exciton–plasmon interactions between CdS@g-C3N4 heterojunction and Au@Ag nanoparticles coupled with DNAase-triggered signal amplification: toward highly sensitive photoelectrochemical bioanalysis of microRNA. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5:10840–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Achermann M. Exciton–plasmon interactions in metal-semiconductor nanostructures. J Phys Chem Lett. 2010;1:2837–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Govorov A, Bryant G, Zhang W, Skeini T, Lee J, Kotov N, et al. Exciton–plasmon interaction and hybrid exciton in semiconductor–metal nanoparticle assemblies. Nano Lett. 2006;6:984–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee J, Hernadez P, Lee J, Govorov A, Kotov N. Exciton–plasmon interactions in molecular spring assemblies of nanowires and wavelength-based protein detection. Nat Mater. 2007;6:291–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fedutik Y, Temnov V, Woggon U, Ustinovich E, Artemyev M. Exciton–plasmon interaction in a composite metal–insulator–semiconductor nanowire system. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14939–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cai G, Yu Z, Ren R, Tang D. Exciton–plasmon interaction between AuNPs/graphene nanohybrids and CdS quantum dots/TiO2 for photoelectrochemical aptasensing of prostate-specific antigen. ACS Sens. 2018;3:632–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao W, Yu P, Shan Y, Wang J, Xu J, Chen H. Exciton–plasmon interactions between CdS quantum dots and ag nanoparticles in photoelectrochemical system and its biosensing application. Anal Chem. 2012;84:5892–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma Z, Xu F, Qin Y, Zhao W, Xu J, Chen H. Invoking direct exciton–plasmon interactions by catalytic Ag deposition on Au nanoparticles: Photoelectrochemical bioanalysis with high efficiency. Anal Chem. 2016;88:4183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang K, Lv S, Lin Z, Tang D. CdS:Mn quantum dot-functionalized g-C3N4 nanohybrids as signal generation tags for photoelectrochemical immunoassay of prostate specific antigen coupling DNAzyme concatamer with enzymatic biocatalytic precipitation. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;95:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Samadi-Maybodi A, Farzinia H. Application of CdS QDs incorporated in magnetized powder activated carbon for degradation of some dyes: photodegradation process and comprehensive catalytic and spectroscopic studies. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2018;357:103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xue X, Zhuang Z, Huang F, Lin Z. Understanding the occurrence of the maximum band-edge photoluminescence of TGA-capped CdS QDs via growth kinetic study. Cryst Growth Des. 2013;13:5220–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang K, Zhang G, Li J, Li Y, Wu X. 0D/2D Z-scheme heterojunctions of bismuth tantalate quantum dots/ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets for highly efficient visible light photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:43704–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hermanson GT. Bioconjugate techniques. 2nd ed. Rockford: Pierce Biotechnology; 2008. p. 929.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhuang J, Lai W, Xu M, Zhou Q, Tang D. Plasmonic AuNP/g-C3N4 nanohybrid-based photoelectrochemical sensing platform for ultrasensitive monitoring of polynucleotide kinase activity accompanying DNAzyme-catalyzed precipitation amplification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:8330–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong-Ping Zhang
    • 1
  • Ling-E Wang
    • 1
  • Xiao-Ying Liu
    • 1
  • Zhi-Hua Luo
    • 1
  • Lei Zheng
    • 1
  • Yun He
    • 2
  • Bo Zhang
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyChonggang General HospitalChongqingChina
  2. 2.Department of Cardiology, Xinqiao HospitalThe Army Medical UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations