Capillary electrophoresis–tandem mass spectrometry for multiclass analysis of polar marine toxins
Polar marine toxins are more challenging to analyze by mass spectrometry-based methods than lipophilic marine toxins, which are now routinely measured in shellfish by multiclass reversed-phase liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods. Capillary electrophoresis (CE)–MS/MS is a technique that is well suited for the analysis of polar marine toxins, and has the potential of providing very high resolution separation. Here, we present a CE–MS/MS method developed, with use of a custom-built interface, for the sensitive multiclass analysis of paralytic shellfish toxins, tetrodotoxins, and domoic acid in seafood. A novel, highly acidic background electrolyte (5 M formic acid) was designed to maximize protonation of analytes and to allow a high degree of sample stacking to improve the limits of detection. The method was applied to a wide range of regulated and less common toxin analogues, and exhibited a high degree of selectivity between toxin isomers and matrix interference. The limits of detection in mussel tissue were 0.0052 mg/kg for tetrodotoxins, 0.160 mg/kg for domoic acid, and between 0.0018 and 0.120 mg/kg for paralytic shellfish toxins, all of which showed good linearity. Minimal ionization suppression was observed when the response from neat and mussel-matrix-matched standards was corrected with multiple internal standards. Analysis of shellfish matrix reference materials and spiked samples demonstrated good accuracy and precision. Finally, the method was transferred to a commercial CE–MS/MS system to demonstrate its widespread applicability for use in both R & D and routine regulatory settings. The approach of using a highly acidic background electrolyte is of broad interest, and can be considered generally applicable to simultaneous analysis of other classes of small, polar molecules with differing pKa values.
KeywordsBiotoxins Tetrodotoxin Paralytic shellfish poisoning Domoic acid Harmful algal bloom Capillary electrophoresis
The authors thank Michael Boundy from the Cawthron Institute and Aifeng Li from Ocean University of China for generously providing the sea slug and pufferfish tissue, respectively. Thanks are due to Jean-Francois Roy, Sylvie Larocque, and Dat Phan of Agilent Technologies for arranging access to the commercial capillary electrophoresis–tandem mass spectrometry system and for technical assistance with the related experiments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 1.Sanseverino I, Conduto D, Pozzoli L, Dobricic S, Lettieri T. Algal bloom and its economic impact. Report no. EUR 27905 EN. Ispra: Joint Research Centre; 2016.Google Scholar
- 12.Andrew D, Turner AP. A Schofield, D N Lees, C Baker-Austin. Detection of the pufferfish toxin tetrodotoxin in European bivalves, England, 2013 to 2014. Euro Surveillance. 2015;20:1–7.Google Scholar
- 14.Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, et al. Risks for public health related to the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX) and TTX analogues in marine bivalves and gastropods. EFSA J. 2017;15:1–65.Google Scholar
- 15.Turner AD, Dhanji-Rapkova M, Coates L, Bickerstaff L, Milligan S, O'Neill A, Faulkner D, McEneny H, Baker-Austin C, Lees DN, Algoet M. Detection of tetrodotoxin shellfish poisoning (TSP) toxins and causative factors in bivalve molluscs from the UK. Mar Drugs. 2017;15:277-294.Google Scholar
- 16.AOAC International. AOAC official method 959.08. Paralytic shellfish poison, biological method. Gaithersburg: AOAC International; 2000.Google Scholar
- 17.AOAC International. AOAC official method 2011.02. Quantitative determination of paralytic shellfish toxins in mussels, clams, oysters, and scallops using liquid chromatography and post-column oxidation with fluorescence detection. Gaithersburg: AOAC International; 2011.Google Scholar
- 18.AOAC International. AOAC official method 2005.06, Quantitative determination of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in shellfish using pre-chromatographic oxidation and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Gaithersburg: AOAC International; 2005.Google Scholar
- 19.van den Top HJ, Gerssen A, McCarron P, van Egmond HP. Quantitative determination of marine lipophilic toxins in mussels, oysters and cockles using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: inter-laboratory validation study. Food Addit Contam A. 2011;28:1745–57.Google Scholar
- 21.Thomas KM, Beach DG, Reeves KL, Gibbs RS, Kerrin ES, McCarron P, et al. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for quantitation of paralytic shellfish toxins: validation and application to reference materials. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409:5675–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Boundy MJ, Selwood AI, Harwood DT, McNabb PS, Turner AD. Development of a sensitive and selective liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method for high throughput analysis of paralytic shellfish toxins using graphitised carbon solid phase extraction. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1387:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Coleman R, Lemire SW, Bragg W, Garrett A, Ojeda-Torres G, Hamelin E, et al. Development and validation of a high-throughput online solid phase extraction - liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of tetrodotoxin in human urine. Toxicon. 2016;119:64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.van de Riet J, Gibbs RS, Muggah PM, Rourke WA, JD MN, Quilliam MA, et al. Liquid chromatography post-column oxidation (PCOX) method for the determination of paralytic shellfish toxins in mussels, clams, oysters, and scallops: collaborative study. J AOAC Int. 2011;94:1154–76.Google Scholar
- 28.de la Iglesia P, Barber E, Gimenez G, Rodriguez-Velasco ML, Villar-Gonzalez A, Diogene J. High-throughput analysis of amnesic shellfish poisoning toxins in shellfish by ultra-performance rapid resolution LC-MS/MS. J AOAC Int. 2011;94:555–64.Google Scholar
- 35.Pleasance S, Ayer SW, Laycock MV, Thibault P. Ionspray mass spectrometry of marine toxins. III. Analysis of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins by flow-injection analysis, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1992;6:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Reeves K, Thomas K, Quilliam MA. A mussel tissue certified reference material for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins. In: Henshilwood K, Deegan B, McMahon T, Cusack C, Keaveney S, Silke J, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on molluscan shellfish safety. Galway: Marine Institute; 2006. p. 116-22.Google Scholar
- 44.Rossi R, Arace O, Buonomo MG, Capozzo D, Castellano V, Imbimbo S, et al. Monitoring the presence of domoic acid in the production areas of bivalve molluscs. Ital J Food Saf. 2016;5:5706.Google Scholar
- 51.Selwood AI, Waugh C, Harwood DT, Rhodes LL, Reeve J, Sim J, et al. Acute toxicities of the saxitoxin congeners gonyautoxin 5, gonyautoxin 6, decarbamoyl gonyautoxin 2&3, decarbamoyl neosaxitoxin, C-1&2 and C-3&4 to mice by various routes of administration. Toxins. 2017;9:73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.V. González-Ruiz, N. Drouin, E. Reginato, S. Rudaz, J. Schappler. zeecalc 1.0. https://epgl.unige.ch/labs/fanal/zeecalc. Accessed 5 April, 2018.