Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 16, pp 3827–3833 | Cite as

FractionOptimizer: a method for optimal peptide fractionation in bottom-up proteomics

  • Elizaveta M. Solovyeva
  • Anna A. Lobas
  • Arthur T. Kopylov
  • Irina Y. Ilina
  • Lev I. Levitsky
  • Sergei A. Moshkovskii
  • Mikhail V. Gorshkov
Research Paper

Abstract

Recent advances in mass spectrometry and separation technologies created the opportunities for deep proteome characterization using shotgun proteomics approaches. The “real world” sample complexity and high concentration range limit the sensitivity of this characterization. The common strategy for increasing the sensitivity is sample fractionation prior to analysis either at the protein or the peptide level. Typically, fractionation at the peptide level is performed using linear gradient high-performance liquid chromatography followed by uniform fraction collection. However, this way of peptide fractionation results in significantly suboptimal operation of the mass spectrometer due to the non-uniform distribution of peptides between the fractions. In this work, we propose an approach based on peptide retention time prediction allowing optimization of chromatographic conditions and fraction collection procedures. An open-source software implementing the approach called FractionOptimizer was developed and is available at http://hg.theorchromo.ru/FractionOptimizer. The performance of the developed tool was demonstrated for human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cell line lysate. In these experiments, we improved the uniformity of the peptides distribution between fractions. Moreover, in addition to 13,492 peptides, we found 6787 new peptides not identified in the experiments without fractionation and up to 800 new proteins (or 25%).

Graphical abstract

The analysis workflow employing FractionOptimizer software.

Keywords

Proteomics Peptide fractionation Mass spectrometry Bottom-up proteomics Liquid chromatography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 14-14-00971. The authors thank Dr. Irina A. Tarasova and Mark V. Ivanov for helpful discussions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2018_1054_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1577 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ferguson PL, Smith RD. Proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003;32:399–424.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pirmoradian M, Budamgunta H, Chingin K, Zhang B, Astorga-Wells J, Zubarev RA. Rapid and deep human proteome analysis by single-dimension shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12:3330–8.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O113.028787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang Y, Fonslow BR, Shan B, Baek M, Yates JR. Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. Chem Rev. 2013;113:2343–94.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr3003533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harper JW, Bennett EJ. Proteome complexity and the forces that drive proteome imbalance. Nature. 2016;537:328–38.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michalski A, Cox J, Mann M. More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC−MS/MS. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:1785–93.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr101060v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelstrup CD, Jersie-Christensen RR, Batth TS, Arrey TN, Kuehn A, Kellmann M, et al. Rapid and deep proteomes by faster sequencing on a benchtop quadrupole ultra-high-field Orbitrap mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:6187–95.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr500985w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagaraj N, Alexander Kulak N, Cox J, Neuhauser N, Mayr K, Hoerning O, et al. System-wide perturbation analysis with nearly complete coverage of the yeast proteome by single-shot ultra HPLC runs on a bench top Orbitrap. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:M111.013722.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.013722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hebert AS, Richards AL, Bailey DJ, Ulbrich A, Coughlin EE, Westphall MS, et al. The one hour yeast proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:339–47.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.034769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chick JM, Kolippakkam D, Nusinow DP, Zhai B, Rad R, Huttlin EL, et al. A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:743–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gholami AM, Hahne H, Wu Z, Auer FJ, Meng C, Wilhelm M, et al. Global proteome analysis of the NCI-60 cell line panel. Cell Rep. 2013;4:609–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aguilar M. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. In: Aguilar MI, editors. HPLC of Peptides and Proteins. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2004. pp. 9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-742-4:9.
  12. 12.
    Mant CT, Hodges RS. Analysis of peptides by high-performance liquid chromatography. In: Eckenhoff RG, Dmochowski IJ, editors. Methods in enzymology. New York: Academic Press; 1996. pp. 3–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(96)71003-0.
  13. 13.
    Mitulović G. New HPLC techniques for proteomics analysis: a short overview of latest developments. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2015;38:390–403.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2014.941266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gokce E, Andrews GL, Dean RA, Muddiman DC. Increasing proteome coverage with offline RP HPLC coupled to online RP nanoLC-MS. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011;879:610–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.01.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moruz L, Pichler P, Stranzl T, Mechtler K, Käll L. Optimized nonlinear gradients for reversed-phase liquid chromatography in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem. 2013;85:7777–85.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac401145q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Y, Yang F, Gritsenko MA, Wang Y, Clauss T, Liu T, et al. Reversed-phase chromatography with multiple fraction concatenation strategy for proteome profiling of human MCF10A cells. Proteomics. 2011;11:2019–26.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dwivedi RC, Spicer V, Harder M, Antonovici M, Ens W, Standing KG, et al. Practical implementation of 2D HPLC scheme with accurate peptide retention prediction in both dimensions for high-throughput bottom-up proteomics. Anal Chem. 2008;80:7036–42.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac800984n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorshkov AV, Tarasova IA, Evreinov VV, Savitski MM, Nielsen ML, Zubarev RA, et al. Liquid chromatography at critical conditions: comprehensive approach to sequence-dependent retention time prediction. Anal Chem. 2006;78:7770–7.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac060913x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goloborodko AA, Levitsky LI, Ivanov MV, Gorshkov MV. Pyteomics—a Python framework for exploratory data analysis and rapid software prototyping in proteomics. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2013;24:301–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-012-0516-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lobas AA, Karpov DS, Kopylov AT, Solovyeva EM, Ivanov MV, Ilina IY, et al. Exome-based proteogenomics of HEK-293 human cell line: coding genomic variants identified at the level of shotgun proteome. Proteomics. 2016;16:1980–91.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Craig R, Beavis RC. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1466–7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ivanov MV, Levitsky LI, Lobas AA, Panic T, Laskay ÜA, Mitulovic G, et al. Empirical multidimensional space for scoring peptide spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:1911–20.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr401026y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choi M, Eren-Dogu ZF, Colangelo C, Cottrell J, Hoopmann MR, Kapp EA, et al. ABRF proteome informatics research group (iPRG) 2015 study: detection of differentially abundant proteins in label-free quantitative LC-MS/MS experiments. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:945–57.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:2513–26.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.031591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou Y, Gao J, Zhu H, Xu J, He H, Gu L, et al. Enhancing membrane protein identification using a simplified centrifugation and detergent-based membrane extraction approach. Anal Chem. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03710.
  26. 26.
    Laskay ÜA, Lobas AA, Srzentić K, Gorshkov MV, Tsybin YO. Proteome digestion specificity analysis for rational design of extended bottom-up and middle-down proteomics experiments. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:5558–69.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr400522h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Griffin NM, Yu J, Long F, Oh P, Shore S, Li Y, et al. Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomic analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:83–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1592. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bubis JA, Levitsky LI, Ivanov MV, Tarasova IA, Gorshkov MV. Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification methods for shotgun proteomics. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017;31:606–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, Rappsilber J, et al. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4:1265–72.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500061-MCP200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res. 2006;5:2339–47.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr060161n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizaveta M. Solovyeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anna A. Lobas
    • 2
  • Arthur T. Kopylov
    • 3
  • Irina Y. Ilina
    • 3
  • Lev I. Levitsky
    • 2
  • Sergei A. Moshkovskii
    • 3
    • 4
  • Mikhail V. Gorshkov
    • 2
  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)DolgoprudnyRussia
  2. 2.V.L. Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical PhysicsRASMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Biomedical ChemistryMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Pirogov Russian National Research Medical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations