Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 11, pp 2723–2737 | Cite as

Combined untargeted and targeted fingerprinting by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: revealing fructose-induced changes in mice urinary metabolic signatures

  • Davide Bressanello
  • Erica Liberto
  • Massimo Collino
  • Fausto Chiazza
  • Raffaella Mastrocola
  • Stephen E. Reichenbach
  • Carlo Bicchi
  • Chiara Cordero
Research Paper

Abstract

This study exploits the information potential of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography configured with a parallel dual secondary column-dual detection by mass spectrometry and flame ionization (GC×2GC-MS/FID) to study changes in urinary metabolic signatures of mice subjected to high-fructose diets. Samples are taken from mice fed with normal or fructose-enriched diets provided either in aqueous solution or in solid form and analyzed at three stages of the dietary intervention (1, 6, and 12 weeks). Automated Untargeted and Targeted fingerprinting for 2D data elaboration is adopted for the most inclusive data mining of GC×GC patterns. The UT fingerprinting strategy performs a fully automated peak-region features fingerprinting and combines results from pre-targeted compounds and unknowns across the sample-set. The most informative metabolites, with statistically relevant differences between sample groups, are obtained by unsupervised multivariate analysis (MVA) and cross-validated by multi-factor analysis (MFA) with external standard quantitation by GC-MS. Results indicate coherent clustering of mice urine signatures according to dietary manipulation. Notably, the metabolite fingerprints of mice fed with liquid fructose exhibited greater derangement in fructose, glucose, citric, pyruvic, malic, malonic, gluconic, cis-aconitic, succinic and 2-keto glutaric acids, glycine acyl derivatives (N-carboxy glycine, N-butyrylglycine, N-isovaleroylglycine, N-phenylacetylglycine), and hippuric acid. Untargeted fingerprinting indicates some analytes which were not a priori pre-targeted which provide additional insights: N-acetyl glucosamine, N-acetyl glutamine, malonyl glycine, methyl malonyl glycine, and glutaric acid. Visual features fingerprinting is used to track individual variations during experiments, thereby extending the panorama of possible data elaboration tools.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Parallel dual secondary column-dual detection Fructose-induced metabolic derangements Urine metabolic profiling Untargeted and targeted fingerprinting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are indebted with Dr. Martina Carbone for the technical help.

Funding information

This work was supported and funded by the University of Turin (Ricerca Locale 2016 and 2017), Regione Toscana (Bando Nutraceutica 2014), Project TAGIDISFRU, ERA-HDHL-ERANET Biomarkers for Nutrition and Health Implementing the JPG HDHL objectives”—Project “SALIVAGES.”

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethics approval

The research was conducted in accordance with the European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes as well as the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals, issued by the Council for the International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Both the Turin University Ethics Committee (Prot. 6437 22/02/2016) and the Italian Ministry of Health (Prot. 42/2017-PR) approved the experimental protocol. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.

Supplementary material

216_2018_950_MOESM11_ESM.pdf (554 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 554 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Malik VS, Hu FB. Fructose and cardiometabolic health what the evidence from sugar-sweetened beverages tells us. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1615–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rizkalla SW. Health implications of fructose consumption: a review of recent data.(review)(report). Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010;7:82.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lim JS, Mietus-Snyder M, Valente A, Schwarz J-M, Lustig RH. The role of fructose in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teff KL, Grudziak J, Townsend RR, Dunn TN, Grant RW, Adams SH, et al. Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming fructose- and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals in obese men and women: influence of insulin resistance on plasma triglyceride responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1562–9.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lê KA, Ith M, Kreis R, Faeh D, Bortolotti M, Tran C, et al. Fructose overconsumption causes dyslipidemia and ectopic lipid deposition in healthy subjects with and without a family history of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1760–5.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwarz JM, Noworolski SM, Wen MJ, Dyachenko A, Prior JL, Weinberg ME, et al. Effect of a high-fructose weight-maintaining diet on lipogenesis and liver fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:2434–42.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-3678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ritze Y, Bárdos G, D’Haese JG, Ernst B, Thurnheer M, Schultes B, et al. Effect of high sugar intake on glucose transporter and weight regulating hormones in mice and humans. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101702.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mastrocola R, Ferrocino I, Liberto E, Chiazza F, Cento AS, Querio G., Nigro D, Bitonto V, Cutrin JC, Rantsiou K, Durante M, Masini E, Aragno M, Cordero C, Cocolin L CM. Fructose liquid and solid formulations differently affect gut integrity, microbiota composition and related liver toxicity: a comparative in vivo study. J Biochem Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.02.003.
  9. 9.
    Hunter P. Reading the metabolic fine print. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:20–3.  https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Almstetter MF, Oefner PJ, Dettmer K. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography in metabolomics. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402:1993–2013.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5630-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reichenbach SE, Tian X, Tao Q, Ledford EB, Wu Z, Fiehn O. Informatics for cross-sample analysis with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry (GCxGC-HRMS). Talanta. 2011;83:1279–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.09.057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koek MM, Muilwijk B, van Stee LLP, Hankemeier T. Higher mass loadability in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for improved analytical performance in metabolomics analysis. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1186:420–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicolotti L, Cordero C, Bressanello D, Cagliero C, Liberto E, Magagna F, et al. Parallel dual secondary column-dual detection: a further way of enhancing the informative potential of two-dimensional comprehensive gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1360:264–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reichenbach SE, Rempe DW, Tao Q, Bressanello D, Liberto E, Bicchi C, et al. Alignment for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with dual secondary columns and detectors. Anal Chem. 2015;87:10056–63.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sgorbini B, Cagliero C, Boggia L, Liberto E, Reichenbach SE, Rubiolo P, et al. Parallel dual secondary-column-dual detection comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: a flexible and reliable analytical tool for essential oils quantitative profiling. Flavour Fragr J. 2015;30:366–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cordero C, Rubiolo P, Cobelli L, Stani G, Miliazza A, Giardina M, et al. Potential of the reversed-inject differential flow modulator for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography in the quantitative profiling and fingerprinting of essential oils of different complexity. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1417:79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cordero C, Rubiolo P, Reichenbach SE, Carretta A, Cobelli L, Giardina M, et al. Method translation and full metadata transfer from thermal to differential flow modulated comprehensive two dimensional gas chromatography: profiling of suspected fragrance allergens. J Chromatogr A. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.011.
  18. 18.
    Magagna F, Valverde-Som L, Ruíz-Samblás C, Cuadros-Rodríguez L, Reichenbach SE, Bicchi C, et al. Combined untargeted and targeted fingerprinting with comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography for volatiles and ripening indicators in olive oil. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;936:245–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang Q, Wang G, Du Y, Zhu L, A J. GC/MS analysis of the rat urine for metabonomic research. J Chromatogr B 2007;854:20–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.03.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reichenbach SE, Carr PW, Stoll DR, Tao Q. Smart templates for peak pattern matching with comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216:3458–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sgorbini B, Cagliero C, Boggia L, Liberto E, Reichenbach SE, Rubiolo P, Cordero C, Bicchi C. Parallel dual secondary-column-dual detection comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: a flexible and reliable analytical tool for essential oils quantitative profiling. Flavour Fragr J. 2015;  https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3255.
  22. 22.
    Reichenbach SE, Tian X, Boateng AA, Mullen CA, Cordero C, Tao Q. Reliable peak selection for multisample analysis with comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography. Anal Chem. 2013;85:4974–81.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303773v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reichenbach SE, Tian X, Cordero C, Tao Q. Features for non-targeted cross-sample analysis with comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1226:140–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bressanello D, Liberto E, Collino M, Reichenbach SE, Benetti E, Chiazza F, et al. Urinary metabolic fingerprinting of mice with diet-induced metabolic derangements by parallel dual secondary column-dual detection two-dimensional comprehensive gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1361:265–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hollingsworth B V., Reichenbach SE, Tao Q, Visvanathan A. Comparative visualization for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. 2006; 51–58.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Magnusson B, Örnemark U. (eds.) Eurachem Guide: The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods – A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics, (2nd ed. 2014). Available from www.eurachem.org. Last accessed February the 1st, 2018.
  27. 27.
    Barwick V. (Ed), Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Guide to Quality in Analytical Chemistry: An Aid to Accreditation (3 rd ed. 2016). Available from www.eurachem.org. Last accessed on February the 1st, 2018.
  28. 28.
    Commission E. Commission Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Union. 2002;L221:8–36.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao X, Han Q, Liu Y, Sun C, Gang X, Wang G. The relationship between branched-chain amino acid related metabolomic signature and insulin resistance: a systematic review. J Diabetes Res. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2794591.
  30. 30.
    Fontana L, Cummings NE, Apelo SIA, Joshua C, Kasza I, Schmidt BA, et al. HHS public access. Cell Rep. 2016;16:520–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.092.Decreased.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tulipani S, Palau-Rodriguez M, Miñarro Alonso A, Cardona F, Marco-Ramell A, Zonja B, et al. Biomarkers of morbid obesity and prediabetes by metabolomic profiling of human discordant phenotypes. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;463:53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCarty MF, DiNicolantonio JJ. The cardiometabolic benefits of glycine: is glycine an “antidote” to dietary fructose? Open Heart. 2014;1:e000103.  https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cordero C, Zebelo SA, Gnavi G, Griglione A, Bicchi C, Maffei ME, et al. HS-SPME-GC×GC-qMS volatile metabolite profiling of Chrysolina herbacea frass and Mentha spp. leaves. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402:1941–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5600-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cordero C, Liberto E, Bicchi C, Rubiolo P, Reichenbach SE, Tian X, et al. Targeted and non-targeted approaches for complex natural sample profiling by GCxGC-qMS. J Chromatogr Sci. 2010;48:251–61.  https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/48.4.251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Purcaro G, Cordero C, Liberto E, Bicchi C, Conte LS. Toward a definition of blueprint of virgin olive oil by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1334:101–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.01.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Bressanello
    • 1
  • Erica Liberto
    • 1
  • Massimo Collino
    • 1
  • Fausto Chiazza
    • 1
  • Raffaella Mastrocola
    • 2
  • Stephen E. Reichenbach
    • 3
  • Carlo Bicchi
    • 1
  • Chiara Cordero
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del FarmacoUniversità degli Studi di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Clinical and Biological SciencesUniversità degli Studi di TorinoTorinoItaly
  3. 3.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations