Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 410, Issue 6, pp 1725–1733 | Cite as

Bioleaching of two different genetic types of chalcopyrite and their comparative mineralogical assessment

  • Sha Deng
  • Guohua Gu
  • Jing Ji
  • Baoke Xu
Research Paper


The bioleaching of two different genetic types of chalcopyrite by the moderate thermophile Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans was investigated by leaching behaviors elucidation and their comparative mineralogical assessment. The leaching experiment showed that the skarn-type chalcopyrite (STC) revealed a much faster leaching rate with 33.34% copper extracted finally, while only 23.53% copper was bioleached for the porphyry-type chalcopyrite (PTC). The mineralogical properties were analyzed by XRD, SEM, XPS, and Fermi energy calculation. XRD indicated that the unit cell volume of STC was a little larger than that of PTC. SEM indicated that the surface of STC had more steps and ridges. XPS spectra showed that Cu(I) was the dominant species of copper on the surfaces of the two chalcopyrite samples, and STC had much more copper with lower Cu 2p3/2 binding energy. Additionally, the Fermi energy of STC was much higher than that of PTC. These mineralogical differences were in good agreement with the bioleaching behaviors of chalcopyrite. This study will provide some new information for evaluating the oxidation kinetics of chalcopyrite.


Chalcopyrite Bioleaching Genetic types Mineralogical properties 



This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51374249) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973) (No. 2010CB630903).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Hiroyoshi N, Arai M, Miki H, Tsunekawa M, Hirajima T. A new reaction model for the catalytic effect of silver ions on chalcopyrite leaching in sulfuric acid solutions. Hydrometallurgy. 2002;63:257–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Córdoba EM, Muñoz JA, Blázquez ML, González F, Ballester A. Leaching of chalcopyrite with ferric ion. Part I: general aspects. Hydrometallurgy. 2008;93:81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ma L, Wang X, Feng X, Liang Y, Xiao Y, Hao X, et al. Co-culture microorganisms with different initial proportions reveal the mechanism of chalcopyrite bioleaching coupling with microbial community succession. Bioresour Technol. 2017;223:121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rohwerder T, Gehrke T, Kinzler K, Sand W. Bioleaching review part A: progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;63:239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Panda S, Akcil A, Pradhan N, Deveci H. Current scenario of chalcopyrite bioleaching: a review on the recent advances to its heap-leach technology. Bioresour Technol. 2015;196:694–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li Y, Kawashima N, Li J, Chandra AP, Gerson AR. A review of the structure, and fundamental mechanisms and kinetics of the leaching of chalcopyrite. Adv Colloid Interf. 2013;197-198:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao H, Wang J, Gan X, Zheng X, Tao L, Hu M, et al. Effects of pyrite and bornite on bioleaching of two different types of chalcopyrite in the presence of Leptospirillum ferriphilum. Bioresour Technol. 2015;194:28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hiroyoshi N, Hirota M, Hirajima T, Tsunekawa M. A case of ferrous sulfate addition enhancing chalcopyrite leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 1997;47:37–45.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konishi Y, Tokushige M, Asai S, Suzuki T. Copper recovery from chalcopyrite concentrate by acidophilic thermophile Acidianus brierleyi in batch and continuous-flow stirred tank reactors. Hydrometallurgy. 2001;59:271–82.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vilcaez J, Suto K, Inoue C. Bioleaching of chalcopyrite with thermophiles: temperature-pH-ORP dependence. Int J Miner Process. 2008;88:37–44.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fu K, Hai L, Xiaolan M, Yingbo D. Passivation of different genetic types of chalcopyrite bioleaching. J Cent South Univ (Sci Technol). 2011;42:3245–50. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong Y, Lin H, Fu K, Xu X, Zhou S. Bioleaching of two different types of chalcopyrite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2013;20:119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bai J, Wen J, Huang S, Wu B, Liu X, Liu S, et al. Chemical leaching difference characteristics of chalcopyrite with different genetic types. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2014;24:2856–63. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng S, Gu GH, Ji J, Xu BK. Bioleaching of chalcopyrite with two different metallogenic types: a mineralogical perspective. Solid State Phenom. 2017;262:277–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu W, Wei D, Wang B, Fang P, Wang X, Cui B. A new collector used for flotation of oxide minerals. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc. 2009;19:1326–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bulut G, Yenial Ü, Emiroğlu E, Sirkeci AA. Arsenic removal from aqueous solution using pyrite. J Clean Prod. 2014;84:526–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sirkeci AA. Electrokinetic properties of pyrite, arsenopyrite and quartz in the absence and presence of cationic collectors and their flotation behaviour. Miner Eng. 2000;13:1037–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bulut G, Yurtsever Ç. Flotation behaviour of Bitlis kyanite ore. Int J Miner Process. 2004;73:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silverman MP, Lundgren DG. Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cell yields. J Bacteriol. 1959;77:642–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shirley DA. High-resolution X-ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold. Phys Rev B. 1972;5:4709–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sandstrom A, Shchukarev A, Paul J. XPS characterisation of chalcopyrite chemically and bio-leached at high and low redox potential. Miner Eng. 2005;18:505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hiroyoshi N, Miki H, Hirajima T, Tsunekawa M. A model for ferrous-promoted chalcopyrite leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 2000;57:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koleini SMJ, Aghazadeh V, Sandstrom A. Acidic sulphate leaching of chalcopyrite concentrates in presence of pyrite. Miner Eng. 2011;24:381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mikhlin YL, Tomashevich YV, Asanov IP, Okotrub AV, Varnek VA, Vyalikh DV. Spectroscopic and electrochemical characterization of the surface layers of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) reacted in acidic solutions. Appl Surf Sci. 2004;225:395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keller L, Murr LE. Acid-bacterial and ferric sulfate leaching of pyrite single crystals. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24:83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Junta JL, Hochella MF. Manganese (II) oxidation at mineral surfaces: a microscopic and spectroscopic study. Geoehim Cosmochim Acta. 1994;58:4985–99.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li Y, Chandra AP, Gerson AR. Scanning photoelectron microscopy studies of freshly fractured chalcopyrite exposed to O2 and H2O. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2014;133:372–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hung A, Muscat J, Yarovsky I, Russo SP. Density-functional theory studies of pyrite FeS2(100) and (110) surfaces. Surf Sci. 2002;513:511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cai J, Philpott MR. Electronic structure of bulk and (001) surface layers of pyrite FeS2. Comput Mater Sci. 2004;30:358–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qiu G, Qi X, Hu Y. First-principles calculation of the electronic structure of the stoichiometric pyrite FeS2(100) surface (no. 03-11). Comput Mater Sci. 2004;29:89–94.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chandra AP, Gerson AR. The mechanisms of pyrite oxidation and leaching: a fundamental perspective. Surf Sci Rep. 2010;65:293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khoshkhoo M, Dopson M, Shchukarev A, Sandström Å. Chalcopyrite leaching and bioleaching: an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) investigation on the nature of hindered dissolution. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;149:220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harmer SL, Thomas JE, Fornasiero D, Gerson AR. The evolution of surface layers formed during chalcopyrite leaching. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2006;70:4392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baer DR, Engelhard MH, Gaspar DJ, Lea AS, Windisch CF. Use and limitations of electron flood gun control of surface potential during XPS: two non-homogeneous sample types. Surf Interface Anal. 2002;33:781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nesbitt HW, Muir IJ. Oxidation states and speciation of secondary products on pyrite and arsenopyrite reacted with mine waste waters and air. Mineral Petrol. 1998;62:123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schaufu AG, Nesbitt HW, Kartio I, Laajalehto K, Bancroft GM, Szargan R. Reactivity of surface chemical states on fractured pyrite. Surf Sci. 1998;411:321–28.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Klauber C, Parker A, van Bronswijk W, Watling H. Sulphur speciation of leached chalcopyrite surfaces as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Int J Miner Process. 2001;62:65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khoshkhoo M, Dopson M, Engström F, Sandström Å. New insights into the influence of redox potential on chalcopyrite leaching behaviour. Miner Eng. 2017;100:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Crundwell FK. The influence of the electronic structure of solids on the anodic dissolution and leaching of semiconducting sulphide minerals. Hydrometallurgy. 1988;21:155–90.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Crundwell FK. Effect of iron impurity in zinc sulfide concentrates on the rate of dissolution. AICHE J. 1988;34:1128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Morrison SR. Electrochemistry at semiconductor and oxidized metal electrodes. New York: Plenum Press; 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Minerals Processing and BioengineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations