Abstract
An international intercomparison involving eight national metrology institutes (NMIs) was conducted to establish their current measurement capabilities for determining five selected congeners from the brominated flame retardant classes polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polybrominated biphenyls. A candidate reference material consisting of polypropylene fortified with technical mixtures of penta-, octa- and decabromo diphenyl ether and decabromo biphenyl, which was thoroughly assessed for material homogeneity and stability, was used as study material. The analytical procedures applied by the participants differed with regard to sample pre-treatment, extraction, clean-up, employed calibrants and type of calibration procedure as well as regarding analytical methods used for separation, identification and quantification of the flame retardant congeners (gas chromatography coupled to an electron capture detector (GC-ECD), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the electron ionisation mode (GC-EI-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the electron capture negative ionisation mode (GC-ECNI-MS), and liquid chromatography-inductive coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LC-ICP-MS)). The laboratory means agreed well with relative standard deviations of the mean of means of 1.9%, 4.8%, 5.5% and 5.4% for brominated diphenyl ether (BDE) 47, 183 and 209 and for the brominated biphenyl (BB) congener 209, respectively. For BDE 206, a relative standard deviation of 28.5% was obtained. For all five congeners, within-laboratory relative standard deviations of six measurements obtained under intermediate precision conditions were between 1% and 10%, and reported expanded measurements uncertainties typically ranged from 4% to 10% (8% to 14% for BDE 206). Furthermore, the results are in good agreement with those obtained in the characterization exercise for determining certified values for the flame retardant congeners in the same material. The results demonstrate the state-of-the-art measurement capabilities of NMIs for quantifying representative BDE congeners and BB 209 in a polymer. The outcome of this intercomparison (pilot study) in conjunction with possible improvements for employing exclusively calibrants with thoroughly assessed purity suggests that a key comparison aiming at underpinning calibration and measurement capability (CMC) claims of NMIs can be conducted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Costa LG, Giordano G (2007) Neurotoxicology 28:1047–1067
Ballschmiter K, Bacher R, Mennel A, Fischer R, Riehle U, Swerev MJ (1992) J High Res Chromatogr 15:260–270
Darnerud PO (2003) Environ Int 29:841–853
Legler J, Brouwer A (2003) Environ Int 29:879–885
Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off J Eur Comm L37 (2003) 19
Commission Decision 2005/618/EC. Off J Eur Comm L 214 (2005) 65
Commission Decision 2005/717/EC. Off J Eur Comm L 271 (2005) 48
European Court of Justice, Case C-14/06, 2008
Stapleton H (2006) Anal Bioanal Chem 386:807–817
Dirtu AC, Ravindra K, Roosens L, van Grieken R, Neels H, Blust R, Covaci A (2008) J Chromatogr A 1186:295–301
Schlummer M, Brandl F, Mäurer A, van Eldik R (2005) J Chromatogr A 1064:39–51
de Boer J, Cofino WP (2002) Chemosphere 46:625–633
de Boer J, Wells DE (2006) Trends Anal Chem 25:364–372
Kierkegaard A, Sellström U, McLachlan MS (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:364–375
Linsinger TPJ, Voorspoels S, Liebich A (2008) Anal Bioanal Chem 390:399–409
Linsinger TPJ, Pauwels J, van der Veen AMH, Schimmel H, Lamberty A (2001) Accred Qual Assur 6:20–26
Linsinger T, Birgersson-Liebich A, Pellizzato F, Venelinov T, Voorspoels S, Lamberty A (2009) EUR 23677 EN, ISBN 978-92-79-11105-1
Lamberty A, Schimmel H, Pauwels J (1998) Fres J Anal Chem 360:359–361
Linsinger TPJ, Pauwels J, Lamberty A, Schimmel H, van der Veen AMH, Siekmann L (2001) Fres J Anal Chem 370:183–188
Linsinger TPJ, Birgersson-Liebich A, Lamberty A, Pellizzato F, Venelinov T, Voorspoels S (2009) Anal Chem 81:3792–3800
Acknowledgements
Thanks to all participating laboratories, to NIST for provision of the candidate RMs used as QC solution, and to IRMM for providing the study material.
Disclaimer
Certain commercial equipment, instruments or materials are identified in this paper to specify adequately the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or any other participant; nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 449 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeleny, R., Voorspoels, S., Ricci, M. et al. Evaluation of the state-of-the-art measurement capabilities for selected PBDEs and decaBB in plastic by the international intercomparison CCQM-P114. Anal Bioanal Chem 396, 1501–1511 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3314-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3314-7