Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid molecular typing of Tuber melanosporum, T. brumale and T. indicum from tree seedlings and canned truffles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have developed new DNA extraction and purification procedures for investigation of mycorrhized seedlings and canned truffles. Use of these procedures on approximately 100 mg initial material enabled good sample representation. For mycorrhized seedlings, Taq polymerase inhibitors were discarded irrespective of tree species. In routine analysis we systematically used consensus primers ITS1/ITS4 to check the absence of Taq polymerase inhibitors and the presence of fungus DNA. Positive response with ITS validates other positive or negative PCR results. Absence of amplification with ITS prevents validation of other results. For canned truffles, DNA harvested from ascocarps sterilized for one and a half hours at 115°C was amplified with specific primers. We have developed consensus primers, named R12/F12, to check for the presence of amplifiable fungus DNA and the absence of Taq polymerase inhibitors. Here also, positive response with consensus R12/F12 validates other positive or negative PCR results. We have developed one primer pair specific for T. brumale and another specific for T. melanosporum. We can then characterize these two taxa, which enables the use of “truffle or truffled” French designations. We can also characterize T. indicum, the Asiatic black truffle that might fraudulently be sold as T. melanosporum and T. brumale. These three specific primer pairs were used independently of DNA extraction from tree seedlings or canned truffles. Our process is specific, sensitive, convenient, and quick.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Decision no. 67 of the C.T.C.P.A. (Dury Les Amiens, France) dated from 26 July 1973, approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (J.O. of 13 October 1973)

  2. Decision no. 72 of the C.T.C.P.A. approved by the French Service of Frauds Repression (letter no. 83926 of 1 July 1974)

  3. Technique Note came into effect 26 July 1973 by conjoined decision of CTCPA and Ctifl, approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (J.O. of 13 October 1973)

  4. Fourré G, Riousset G, Riousset L (1996) Bull Fed Assoc Mycol Mediterr 9:3–21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pandey RN, Adams RP, Flournoy LE (1996) Plant Mol Biol Rep 14:17–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson DG, Boehm KS, Stack SM (1997) Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:148–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tengel C, Schüssler P, Setzke E, Balles J, Sprenger-Haussels M (2001) Biotechniques 31:426–429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henrion B, Chevalier G, Martin F (1994) Mycol Res 98:37–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Paolocci F, Rubini A, Granetti B, Arcioni S (1999) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chevalier G, Grente J (1979) Mushroom Sci 10:483–505

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cesarone CF, Bolognesi C, Santi L (1979) Anal Biochem 100:188–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocol: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, San Diego, pp 315–322

  13. Gandeboeuf D, Dupré C, Roeckel-Drevet P, Nicolas P, Chevalier G (1997) Can J Microbiol 43:723–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mabru D, Dupré C, Douet JP, Leroy P, Ravel C, Ricard JM, Médina B, Castroviejo M, Chevalier G (2001) Mycorrhiza 11:89–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martsinkovskaya AI, Moukhamedov RS, Abdukarimov AA (1996) Plant Mol Biol Rep 14:44–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amicucci A, Zambonelli A, Giomaro G, Potenza L, Stocchi V (1998) Mol Ecol 7:273–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Watson RJ, Blackwell B (2000) Can J Microbiol 46:633–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Douet JP, Gandeboeuf D, Di Battista C, Bardet MC, Martin F, Médina B, Chevalier G, Castroviejo M (1999) Actes du V congrès International, Science et culture de la truffe: 2.66–2.69

  19. Meyer R (1999) Food Control 10:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rehbein H, Mackie IM, Pryde S, Gonzales-Sotelo C, Medina I, Perez-Martin R, Quinteiro J, Rey-Mendez M (1999) Food Chem 64:263–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) Nucleic Acid Res 24:4876–4882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Douet.

Additional information

J.P. Douet and D. Mabru have contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douet, J.P., Castroviejo, M., Mabru, D. et al. Rapid molecular typing of Tuber melanosporum, T. brumale and T. indicum from tree seedlings and canned truffles. Anal Bioanal Chem 379, 668–673 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2643-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2643-9

Keywords

Navigation