Direct inversion of the iterative subspace (DIIS) convergence accelerator for crystalline solids employing Gaussian basis sets

Regular Article
  • 56 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. In Memoriam of Claudio Zicovich

Abstract

When dealing with crystalline solids, convergence of iterative procedures such as self-consistent field (SCF) or coupled–perturbed equations is often more difficult than in the case of molecular systems, specially when a local basis set of atom-centered Gaussians is adopted. Reasons are usually to be found in the close packing of atoms and peculiar chemical characters, such as metallic bond. In this work, a periodic implementation of the direct inversion of the iterative subspace (DIIS) method for crystalline solids is presented for SCF and electric field response up to second order. The error vectors are computed in reciprocal space and implemented for the energy, polarizability and up to second hyperpolarizability. The performance of different DIIS flavors is benchmarked on a representative set of 42 systems including metallic, ionic, molecular and covalent crystals, bulk crystals, surfaces and nanotubes, adopting all-electron basis sets as well as pseudopotentials. Interestingly, it is seen that the error vectors evaluated in the central (gamma) point of the Brillouin zone are sufficient in all cases for an optimal DIIS performance.

Keywords

DIIS CDIIS CPHF/CPKS ab initio Gaussian basis sets 

Supplementary material

214_2018_2238_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (229 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 228 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Pulay P (1980) Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences. The case of SCF iteration. Chem Phys Lett 73(2):393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pulay P (1982) Improved SCF convergence acceleration. J Comput Chem 3(4):556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson DD (1988) Modified Broyden’s method for accelerating convergence in self-consistent calculations. Phys Rev B 38:12807–12813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson DG (1965) Iterative procedures for nonlinear integral equations. J Assoc Comput Mach 12:547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graves-Morris PR, Roberts DE, Salamc A (2000) The epsilon algorithm and related topics. J Comput Appl Math 122:51–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kudin KN, Scuseria GE, Cancès E (2002) A black-box self-consistent field convergence algorithm: one step closer. J Chem Phys 116(19):8255–8261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garza AJ, Scuseria GE (2012) Comparison of self-consistent field convergence acceleration techniques. J Chem Phys 137(5):054110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu X, Yang W (2010) Accelerating self-consistent field convergence with the augmented Roothaan Hall energy function. J Chem Phys 132(5):054109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen YK, Wang YA (2011) Listb: a better direct approach to list. J Chem Theory Comput 7(10):3045–3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li H, Yaron DJ (2016) A least-squares commutator in the iterative subspace method for accelerating self-consistent field convergence. J Chem Theory Comput 12(11):5322–5332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pople JA, Krishnan R, Schlegel HB, Binkley JS (1979) Derivative studies in Hartree–Fock and Møller–Plesset theories. Int J Quant Chem 16(S13):225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dovesi R, Erba A, Orlando R, Zicovich-Wilson CM, Civalleri B, Maschio L, Ferrabone M, Rérat M, Casassa S, Baima J, Salustro S, Kirtman B (2018) Quantum-mechanical condensed matter simulations with crystal. WIREs Comput Mol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1360 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zicovich-Wilson CM, Dovesi R (1998) On the use of symmetry-adapted crystalline orbitals in SCF-LCAO periodic calculations. I. The construction of the symmetrized orbitals. Int J Quantum Chem 67:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Intel(R) Math Kernel Libraries 2017 update 3 for LinuxGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrero M, Rérat M, Kirtman B, Dovesi R (2008) Calculation of first and second static hyperpolarizabilities of one- to three-dimensional periodic compounds. Implementation in the CRYSTAL code. J Chem Phys 129:244110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Helgaker T, Jørgensen P, Olsen J (2000) Molecular electronic structure theory. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamilton TP, Pulay P (1986) Direct inversion in the iterative subspace (DIIS) optimization of open-shell, excited-state, and small multiconfiguration SCF wave functions. J Chem Phys 84(10):5728–5734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maschio L, Kirtman B, Rérat M, Orlando R, Dovesi R (2013) Ab initio analytical Raman intensities for periodic systems through a coupled perturbed Hartree–Fock/Kohn–Sham method in an atomic orbital basis. I. Theory. J Chem Phys 139:164101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    King-Smith RD, Vanderbilt D (1993) Theory of polarization of crystalline solids. Phys Rev B 47:1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bishop DM, Gu FL, Kirtman B (2001) Coupled–perturbed Hartree–Fock theory for infinite periodic systems: calculation of static electric properties of (LiH)n,(LiH)n, (FH)n,(FH)n, (H2O)n,(H2O)n, (–CNH–)n,(–CNH–)n, and (–CH=CH–)n. J Chem Phys 114:7633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sadlej AJ (1978) Comments on the geometric approximation to the second-order perturbed energies. Chem Phys Lett 58(4):561–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Császár P, Pulay P (1984) Geometry optimization by direct inversion in the iterative subspace. J Mol Struct 114:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Chimica, NIS (Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces) Centre and C3S (Centre of Competence for Scientific Computing)Università di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations