Abstract
Rationale
Modafinil is increasingly used by healthy humans as a neuroenhancer in order to improve cognitive functioning. Research on the effects of modafinil on cognition yielded most consistent findings for complex tasks relying on the prefrontal cortex (PFC).
Objectives
The present randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study aimed to investigate the effect of a single dose of modafinil (200 mg) on everyday moral decision making and its neural correlates, which have been linked to the ventro- and dorsomedial PFC.
Methods
Healthy male study participants were presented with short stories describing everyday moral or neutral dilemmas. Each moral dilemma required a decision between a personal desire and a moral standard, while the neutral dilemmas required decisions between two personal desires. The participants underwent this task twice, once under the influence of modafinil and once under placebo. Brain activity associated with the processing of the dilemmas was assessed by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Results
For the processing of moral vs. neutral dilemmas, activations were found in a network of brain regions linked to social cognitive processes including, among others, the bilateral medial PFC, the insula, and the precuneus. Modafinil was found to increase the number of moral decisions and had no effect on brain activity associated with dilemma processing. Exploratory analyses revealed reduced response-locked activity in the dorsomedial PFC for moral compared to neutral dilemmas under modafinil, but not under placebo.
Conclusions
The results are discussed in terms of altered predictions of others’ emotional states under modafinil, possibly due to higher processing efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akintomide GS, Rickards H (2011) Narcolepsy: a review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 7:507–518. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S23624
Aron AR (2007) The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 13:214–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407299288
Battleday RM, Brem A-K (2015) Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in healthy non-sleep-deprived subjects: a systematic review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 25:1865–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.028
Becker PM, Schwartz JRL, Feldman NT, Hughes RJ (2004) Effect of modafinil on fatigue, mood, and health-related quality of life in patients with narcolepsy. Psychopharmacology 171:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1508-9
Bellebaum C, Kuchinke L, Roser P (2017) Modafinil alters decision making based on feedback history—a randomized placebo-controlled double blind study in humans. J Psychopharmacol 31:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116668591
Bernhardt BC, Singer T (2012) The neural basis of empathy. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150536
Bhanji JP, Beer JS, Bunge SA (2010) Taking a gamble or playing by the rules: dissociable prefrontal systems implicated in probabilistic versus deterministic rule-based decisions. Neuroimage 49:1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.030
Bond AJ, Lader MH (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x
Bzdok D, Schilbach L, Vogeley K, Schneider K, Laird AR, Langner R, Eickhoff SB (2012) Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Struct Funct 217:783–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y
Cabanis M, Pyka M, Mehl S, Müller BW, Loos-Jankowiak S, Winterer G, Wölwer W, Musso F, Klingberg S, Rapp AM, Langohr K, Wiedemann G, Herrlich J, Walter H, Wagner M, Schnell K, Vogeley K, Kockler H, Shah NJ, Stöcker T, Thienel R, Pauly K, Krug A, Kircher T (2013) The precuneus and the insula in self-attributional processes. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 13:330–345. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0143-5
Decety J, Lamm C (2007) The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 13:580–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407304654
Dietz P, Striegel H, Franke AG, Lieb K, Simon P, Ulrich R (2013) Randomized response estimates for the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in university students. Pharmacotherapy 33:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1166
Esposito R, Cilli F, Pieramico V, Ferretti A, Macchia A, Tommasi M, Saggino A, Ciavardelli D, Manna A, Navarra R, Cieri F, Stuppia L, Tartaro A, Sensi SL (2013) Acute effects of modafinil on brain resting state networks in young healthy subjects. PLoS One 8:e69224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069224
Ethofer T, Bretscher J, Wiethoff S, Bisch J, Schlipf S, Wildgruber D, Kreifelts B (2013) Functional responses and structural connections of cortical areas for processing faces and voices in the superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage 76:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.064
Fernández A, Mascayano F, Lips W, Painel A, Norambuena J, Madrid E (2015) Effects of modafinil on attention performance, short-term memory and executive function in university students: a randomized trial. Medwave 15:e6166. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2015.05.6166
Franke AG, Bonertz C, Christmann M, Huss M, Fellgiebel A, Hildt E, Lieb K (2011) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 44:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268417
Franke AG, Bagusat C, Dietz P, Hoffmann I, Simon P, Ulrich R, Lieb K (2013) Use of illicit and prescription drugs for cognitive or mood enhancement among surgeons. BMC Med 11:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-102
Franke AG, Bagusat C, Rust S, Engel A, Lieb K (2014) Substances used and prevalence rates of pharmacological cognitive enhancement among healthy subjects. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 264(Suppl 1):90–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0537-1
Funayama T, Ikeda Y, Tateno A, Takahashi H, Okubo Y, Fukayama H, Suzuki H (2014) Modafinil augments brain activation associated with reward anticipation in the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 231:3217–3228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3499-0
Garrigan B, Adlam ALR, Langdon PE (2016) The neural correlates of moral decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis of moral evaluations and response decision judgements. Brain Cogn 108:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.07.007
Ghio M, Vaghi MMS, Perani D, Tettamanti M (2016) Decoding the neural representation of fine-grained conceptual categories. Neuroimage 132:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.009
Greene JD (2007) Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cogn Sci 11:322–323; author reply 323-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004
Greene JD, Nystrom LE, Engell AD, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2004) The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44:389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293:2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
Kim W, Tateno A, Arakawa R, Sakayori T, Ikeda Y, Suzuki H, Okubo Y (2014) In vivo activity of modafinil on dopamine transporter measured with positron emission tomography and 18FFE-PE2I. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17:697–703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145713001612
Kulendran M, Borovoi L, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, Vlaev I (2017) Impulsivity predicts weight loss after obesity surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.031
Madras BK, Xie Z, Lin Z, Jassen A, Panas H, Lynch L, Johnson R, Livni E, Spencer TJ, Bonab AA, Miller GM, Fischman AJ (2006) Modafinil occupies dopamine and norepinephrine transporters in vivo and modulates the transporters and trace amine activity in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 319:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.106583
Maher B (2008) Poll results: look who’s doping. Nature 452:674–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/452674a
Marchant NL, Kamel F, Echlin K, Grice J, Lewis M, Rusted JM (2009) Modafinil improves rapid shifts of attention. Psychopharmacology 202:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1395-1
Minzenberg MJ, Watrous AJ, Yoon JH, Ursu S, Carter CS (2008) Modafinil shifts human locus coeruleus to low-tonic, high-phasic activity during functional MRI. Science 322:1700–1702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164908
Minzenberg MJ, Yoon JH, Carter CS (2011) Modafinil modulation of the default mode network. Psychopharmacology 215:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2111-5
Mitchell JP, Macrae CN, Banaji MR (2004) Encoding-specific effects of social cognition on the neural correlates of subsequent memory. J Neurosci 24:4912–4917. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0481-04.2004
Mitchell JP, Macrae CN, Banaji MR (2006) Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50:655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040
Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R (2007) Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends Cogn Sci 11:319–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.001
Müller U, Rowe JB, Rittman T, Lewis C, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2013) Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers. Neuropharmacology 64:490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.009
Müller U, Steffenhagen N, Regenthal R, Bublak P (2004) Effects of modafinil on working memory processes in humans. Psychopharmacology 177:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1926-3
Murillo-Rodríguez E, Barciela Veras A, Barbosa Rocha N, Budde H, Machado S (2018) An overview of the clinical uses, pharmacology, and safety of modafinil. ACS Chem Neurosci 9:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00374
Ott T, Nieder A (2019) Dopamine and cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 23:213–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.006
Pelphrey KA, Singerman JD, Allison T, McCarthy G (2003) Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context. Neuropsychologia 41:156–170
Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2012) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59:2142–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018
Qu W-M, Huang Z-L, Xu X-H, Matsumoto N, Urade Y (2008) Dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors are essential for the arousal effect of modafinil. J Neurosci 28:8462–8469. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1819-08.2008
Raichle ME (2015) The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 38:433–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030
Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
Randall DC, Fleck NL, Shneerson JM, File SE (2004) The cognitive-enhancing properties of modafinil are limited in non-sleep-deprived middle-aged volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 77:547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2003.12.016
Randall DC, Shneerson JM, File SE (2005a) Cognitive effects of modafinil in student volunteers may depend on IQ. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 82:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2005.07.019
Randall DC, Shneerson JM, Plaha KK, File SE (2003) Modafinil affects mood, but not cognitive function, in healthy young volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol 18:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.456
Randall DC, Viswanath A, Bharania P, Elsabagh SM, Hartley DE, Shneerson JM, File SE (2005b) Does modafinil enhance cognitive performance in young volunteers who are not sleep-deprived? J Clin Psychopharmacol 25:175–179
Rasetti R, Mattay VS, Stankevich B, Skjei K, Blasi G, Sambataro F, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Goldberg TE, Callicott JH, Apud JA, Weinberger DR (2010) Modulatory effects of modafinil on neural circuits regulating emotion and cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2101–2109. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.83
Reniers RLEP, Corcoran R, Völlm BA, Mashru A, Howard R, Liddle PF (2012) Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network. Biol Psychol 90:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.009
Repantis D, Schlattmann P, Laisney O, Heuser I (2010) Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: a systematic review. Pharmacol Res 62:187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002
Schaich Borg J, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA (2011) Neural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation. Soc Neurosci 6:398–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.559363
Schultz W (2016) Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nat Rev Neurosci 17:183–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.26
Sevinc G, Spreng RN (2014) Contextual and perceptual brain processes underlying moral cognition: a quantitative meta-analysis of moral reasoning and moral emotions. PLoS One 9:e87427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087427
Shamay-Tsoory SG (2011) The neural bases for empathy. Neuroscientist 17:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410379268
Shiner T, Seymour B, Wunderlich K, Hill C, Bhatia KP, Dayan P, Dolan RJ (2012) Dopamine and performance in a reinforcement learning task: evidence from Parkinson’s disease. Brain 135:1871–1883. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws083
Siegel JS, Power JD, Dubis JW, Vogel AC, Church JA, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2014) Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high-motion data points. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1981–1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22307
Sommer M, Rothmayr C, Döhnel K, Meinhardt J, Schwerdtner J, Sodian B, Hajak G (2010) How should I decide? The neural correlates of everyday moral reasoning. Neuropsychologia 48:2018–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.023
Teter CJ, McCabe SE, LaGrange K, Cranford JA, Boyd CJ (2006) Illicit use of specific prescription stimulants among college students: prevalence, motives, and routes of administration. Pharmacotherapy 26:1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.26.10.1501
Tobler PN, Kalis A, Kalenscher T (2008) The role of moral utility in decision making: an interdisciplinary framework. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 8:390–401. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.4.390
Turner DC, Robbins TW, Clark L, Aron AR, Dowson J, Sahakian BJ (2003) Cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 165:260–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-002-1250-8
van Overwalle F (2009) Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 30:829–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547
Vogelsang DA, D’Esposito M (2018) Is there evidence for a rostral-caudal gradient in fronto-striatal loops and what role does dopamine play? Front Neurosci 12:242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00242
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Logan J, Alexoff D, Zhu W, Telang F, Wang G-J, Jayne M, Hooker JM, Wong C, Hubbard B, Carter P, Warner D, King P, Shea C, Xu Y, Muench L, Apelskog-Torres K (2009) Effects of modafinil on dopamine and dopamine transporters in the male human brain: clinical implications. JAMA 301:1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.351
Watson R, Latinus M, Charest I, Crabbe F, Belin P (2014) People-selectivity, audiovisual integration and heteromodality in the superior temporal sulcus. Cortex 50:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.011
Winder-Rhodes SE, Chamberlain SR, Idris MI, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ, Müller U (2010) Effects of modafinil and prazosin on cognitive and physiological functions in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol 24:1649–1657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881109105899
Funding
We would like to thank the Mercator Foundation for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ngo, T., Ghio, M., Kuchinke, L. et al. Moral decision making under modafinil: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover fMRI study. Psychopharmacology 236, 2747–2759 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05250-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05250-y