High and escalating levels of cocaine intake are dissociable from subsequent incentive motivation for the drug in rats
- 418 Downloads
Taking high and increasing amounts of cocaine is thought to be necessary for the development of addiction. Consequently, a widely used animal model of drug self-administration involves giving animals continuous drug access during long sessions (LgA), as this produces high and escalating levels of intake. However, human cocaine addicts likely use the drug with an intermittent rather than continuous pattern, producing spiking brain cocaine levels.
Using an intermittent-access (IntA) cocaine self-administration procedure in rats, we studied the relationship between escalation of cocaine intake and later incentive motivation for the drug, as measured by responding under a progressive ratio schedule of cocaine reinforcement.
First, under IntA, rats escalated their cocaine use both within and between sessions. However, escalation did not predict later incentive motivation for the drug. Second, incentive motivation for cocaine was similar in IntA-rats limited to low- and non-escalating levels of drug intake (IntA-Lim) and in IntA-rats that took high and escalating levels of drug. Finally, IntA-Lim rats took much less cocaine than rats given continuous drug access during each self-administration session (LgA-rats). However, IntA-Lim rats later responded more for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.
Taking large and escalating quantities of cocaine does not appear necessary to increase incentive motivation for the drug. Taking cocaine in an intermittent pattern—even in small amounts—is more effective in producing this addiction-relevant change. Thus, beyond the amount of drug taken, the temporal kinetics of drug use predict change in drug use over time.
KeywordsAddiction Intravenous drug self-administration Intermittent access Long access Escalation of cocaine intake Binge-like cocaine intake Progressive ratio
We are thankful to Dr. David C. S. Roberts for the scientific inspiration leading to this work and to Dr. Terry E. Robinson for wise comments on this manuscript.
F.A performed research and analyzed the data. F.A and A.N.S designed the research and wrote the paper. F.A and K.B.G wrote and tested the computer code needed to apply the IntA drug self-administration procedure to the operant conditioning cages in the laboratory.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- APA (2013) DSM V Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
- Beveridge TJR, Wray P, Brewer A, Shapiro B, Mahoney JJ, Newton TF (2012) Analyzing human cocaine use patterns to inform animal addiction model development. Published abstract for the College on Problems of Drug Dependence annual meeting. Palm Springs, CAGoogle Scholar
- Briand LA, Flagel SB, Garcia-Fuster MJ, Watson SJ, Akil H, Sarter M, Robinson TE (2008) Persistent alterations in cognitive function and prefrontal dopamine D2 receptors following extended, but not limited, access to self-administered cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:2969–2980CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Martin-Garcia E, Courtin J, Renault P, Fiancette JF, Wurtz H, Simonnet A, Levet F, Herry C, Deroche-Gamonet V (2014) Frequency of cocaine self-administration influences drug seeking in the rat: optogenetic evidence for a role of the prelimbic cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 39:2317–2330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wise RA, Newton P, Leeb K, Burnette B, Pocock D, Justice JB, Jr. (1995) Fluctuations in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentration during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 120: 10–20Google Scholar