Sex-specific attenuation of impulsive action by progesterone in a go/no-go task for cocaine in rats
- 200 Downloads
Previous work indicated that progesterone (PRO) reduced impulsive choice for cocaine in female but not male rats (Smethells et al. Psychopharmacology 233:2999–3008, 2016). Impulsive action, typically measured by responding for a reinforcer during a signaled period of nonavailability of natural reinforcers, predicts initiation and escalation of drug use in animals and humans. The present study examined impulsive action for cocaine using PRO in male and female rats trained on a go/no-go task.
Rats were trained on a go/no-go task to respond for cocaine infusions (0.4 mg/kg/inf). During the “go” component, responding was reinforced on a VI 30-s schedule, whereas during the “no-go” component, withholding a response was reinforced on a differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) 30-s schedule. A response during the no-go component resets the DRO timer and served as a measure of impulsive action. After baseline responding was established, rats were pretreated with vehicle (VEH) or PRO (0.5 mg/kg), and DRO resets and responding during the go component for cocaine were compared in males vs. females.
DRO resets were significantly lower following PRO treatment compared to VEH in female, but not male, rats. Response rates and overall infusions during the go component were not significantly altered by PRO in either females or males.
Treatment with PRO resulted in a sex-specific reduction in impulsive action for cocaine, while not affecting cocaine self-administration.
KeywordsDrug addiction Go/no-go Impulsive action Progesterone Rats Sex differences
This study was supported by NIH/NIDA P50 DA033942 (MEC) and NIDA training grant T32 DA007097 (JRS: Thomas Molitor, PI).
- Anker JJ, Carroll ME (2011) Females are more vulnerable to drug abuse than males: evidence from preclinical studies and role of ovarian hormones. In: Neill JC, Kulkarni J (eds) Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Psychopharmacology: Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Springer, London, pp 73–96Google Scholar
- Bayless DW, Darling JS, Stout WJ, Daniel JM (2012) Sex differences in attentional processes in adult rats as measured by performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task. Behav Brain Res 235(1):48–54Google Scholar
- Carroll ME, Smethells JR (2016) Sex differences in behavioral dyscontrol: role in drug addiction and novel treatments. Front Psych 6:175Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2011) Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edn. The National Academic Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Papaleo F, Erickson L, Liu G, Chen J, Weinberger DR (2012) COMT genetic reduction produces sexually divergent effects on cortical analomy and working memory in mice and humans. Creeb Cortex 25:2529–2541Google Scholar
- Solinas M, Thiriet C, Jaber M (2010) Prevention and treatment of drug addiction by environmental enrichment. Neurobiology 96:572–592Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (2015) Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-50, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 15-4927. NSDUH Series H-50). Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data/