Effectiveness of arginase inhibitors against experimentally induced stroke
Stroke is a lethal disease, but it disables more than it kills. Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in adults worldwide, with 90% of survivors having residual deficits. The pathophysiology of stroke is complex and involves a strong inflammatory response associated with oxidative stress and activation of several proteolytic enzymes. The current study was designed to investigate the effect of arginase inhibitors (L-citruline and L-ornithine) against ischemic stroke induced in rats by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). MCAO resulted in alteration in rat behavior, brain infarct, and edema associated with disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This was mediated through overexpression of arginase I and II, inducible NOS (iNOS), malondialdehyde (MDA), advanced glycation end products (AGEs), TNF-α, and IL-1β and downregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Treatment with L-citruline and L-ornithine and the standard neuroprotective drug cerebrolysin ameliorated all the deleterious effects of stroke. These results indicate the possible use of arginase inhibitors in the treatment of stroke after suitable clinical trials are done.
KeywordsStroke MCAO L-citruline L-ornithine Arginase
This study was funded by the University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (S-1438-0096) to Waleed Barakat.
- Alvarez XA, Sampedro C, Cacabelos R, Linares C, Aleixandre M, Garcia-Fantini M et al (2009) Reduced TNF-alpha and increased IGF-I levels in the serum of Alzheimer’s disease patients treated with the neurotrophic agent cerebrolysin. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 12(7):867–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barakat W, Fahmy A, Askar M (2015) Neuroprotective effect of L-Norvaline against ischemic brain damage in rats. Clinical Research and Development 2(3):117–128Google Scholar
- Chang CI, Liao JC, Kuo L (1998) Arginase modulates nitric oxide production in activated macrophages. Am J Phys 274(1 Pt 2):H342–H348Google Scholar
- Ckless K, van der Vliet A, Janssen-Heininger Y (2007) Oxidative-nitrosative stress and post-translational protein modifications: implications to lung structure-function relations. Arginase modulates NF-kappaB activity via a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 36(6):645–653CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Engel O, Kolodziej S, Dirnagl U, Prinz V (2011) Modeling stroke in mice—middle cerebral artery occlusion with the filament model. J Vis Exp 47:2423Google Scholar
- Galler A, Müller G, Schinzel R, Kratzsch J, Kiess W, Münch G (2003) Impact of metabolic control and serum lipids on the concentration of advanced glycation end products in the serum of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy and Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine ELISA. Diabetes Care 26(9):2609–2615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gronros J, Jung C, Lundberg JO, Cerrato R, Ostenson CG, Pernow J (2011) Arginase inhibition restores in vivo coronary microvascular function in type 2 diabetic rats. Am J Phys Heart Circ Phys 300(4):H1174–H1181Google Scholar
- Iadecola C, Zhang F, Xu X (1995b) Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates cerebral ischemic damage. Am J Phys 268(1 Pt 2):R286–R292Google Scholar
- Li ST, Pan J, Hua XM, Liu H, Shen S, Liu JF, Li B, Tao BB, Ge XL, Wang XH, Shi JH, Wang XQ (2014) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase protects neurons against ischemic injury through regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression. CNS Neurosci Ther 20(2):154–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masliah E, Diez-Tejedor E (2012) The pharmacology of neurotrophic treatment with cerebrolysin: brain protection and repair to counteract pathologies of acute and chronic neurological disorders. Drugs Today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998) 48(Suppl A):3–24Google Scholar
- Panahpour H, Nekooeian AA, Dehghani GA (2007) Quantitative evaluation of blood brain barrier permeability in transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Physiol Pharmacol 11(2):99–106Google Scholar