Skip to main content
Log in

Center-stable manifold of the ground state in the energy space for the critical wave equation

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We construct a center-stable manifold of the ground state solitons in the energy space for the critical wave equation without imposing any symmetry, as the dynamical threshold between scattering and blow-up, and also as a collection of solutions which stay close to the ground states. Up to energy slightly above the ground state, this completes the 9-set classification of the global dynamics in our previous paper (DCDS 33:6, 2013). We can also extend the manifold to arbitrary energy size by adding large radiation. The manifold contains all the solutions scattering to the ground state solitons, and also some of those blowing up in finite time by concentration of the ground states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The exclusion of \(d=4\) is by the same reason as in [14], namely to preclude type-II blow-up in the scattering region by [6]. The argument in this paper or [14] is not sensitive to the dimension.

  2. The sign of \(\mu \) is switched from [14] for better notational symmetry.

  3. Here for simplicity we use the exponents available only for \(d\le 6\), but it is clear that we only need Hölder continuity of \(f''\), i.e. \(2^*>2\), and so it can be easily modified for all dimensions \(d\ge 3\).

  4. Note that the proof of Lemma 2.2 did not use any particular structure of \({\triangleleft N}(v^\triangleright )\).

  5. The constant \(\iota _I\) is chosen here to be the same as in Lemma 2.2, just for convenience. It does not mean that the admissible range of \(\iota _I\) is exactly the same for these two lemmas.

References

  1. Beceanu, M.: A centre-stable manifold for the energy-critical wave equation in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) in the symmetric setting. arXiv:1212.2285

  2. Bizoń, P., Chmaj, T., Tabor, Z.: On blowup for semilinear wave equations with a focusing nonlinearity. Nonlinearity 17(6), 2187–2201 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Donninger, R., Huang, M., Krieger, J., Schlag, W.: Exotic blowup solutions for the \(u^5\) focusing wave equation in \(\mathbb{R}^3\). arXiv:1212.4718

  4. Donninger, R., Krieger, J.: Nonscattering solutions and blow up at infinity for the critical wave equation. arXiv:1201.3258v1

  5. Duyckaerts, T., Kenig, C., Merle, F.: Universality of blow-up profile for small radial type II blow-up solutions of energy-critical wave equation. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 13(3), 533–599 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Duyckaerts, T., Kenig, C., Merle, F.: Universality of the blow-up profile for small type II blow-up solutions of energy-critical wave equation: the non-radial case. arXiv:1003.0625, to appear in JEMS

  7. Duyckaerts, T., Kenig, C., Merle, F.: Profiles of bounded radial solutions of the focusing, energy-critical wave equation. arXiv:1201.4986, to appear in GAFA

  8. Duyckaerts, T., Kenig, C., Merle, F.: Classification of radial solutions of the focusing, energy-critical wave equation. arXiv:1204.0031

  9. Duyckaerts, T., Merle, F.: Dynamic of threshold solutions for energy-critical wave equation. Int. Math. Res. Pap. IMRP 2007. 2007(4), 67, Art. ID rpn002 (2008)

  10. Hillairet, M., Raphaël, P.: Smooth type II blow up solutions to the four dimensional energy critical wave equation. arXiv:1010.1768

  11. Kenig, C., Merle, F.: Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical focusing non-linear wave equation. Acta Math. 201(2), 147–212 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Krieger, J., Nahas, J.: Instability of type II blow up for the quintic nonlinear wave equation on \(\mathbb{R}^{3+1}\). arXiv:1212.4628

  13. Krieger, J., Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Global dynamics away from the ground state for the energy-critical nonlinear wave equation. Am. J. Math. 135(4), 935–965 (2013)

  14. Krieger, J., Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Global dynamics of the nonradial energy-critical wave equation above the ground state energy. DCDS 33, 6 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Krieger, J., Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Threshold phenomenon for the quintic wave equation in three dimensions. arXiv:1209.0347

  16. Krieger, J., Schlag, W.: On the focusing critical semi-linear wave equation. Am. J. Math. 129(3), 843–913 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Krieger, J., Schlag, W., Tataru, D.: Slow blow-up solutions for the \(H^1(\mathbb{R}^3)\) critical focusing semilinear wave equation. Duke Math. J. 147(1), 1–53 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine, H.A.: Instability and nonexistence of global solutions to nonlinear wave equations of the form \(Pu_{tt} = -A u + \cal F(u)\). Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 192, 1–21 (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Global dynamics above the ground state energy for the focusing nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. J. Diff. Eq. 250, 2233–2299 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Global dynamics above the ground state energy for the cubic NLS equation in 3D. Calc. Var. PDE 44(1–2), 1–45 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Global dynamics above the ground state for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation without a radial assumption. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 203(3), 809–851 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakanishi, K., Schlag, W.: Invariant manifolds around soliton manifolds for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 44(2), 1175–1210 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Payne, L.E., Sattinger, D.H.: Saddle points and instability of nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Israel J. Math. 22(3–4), 273–303 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Szpak, N.: Relaxation to intermediate attractors in nonlinear wave equations. Theor. Math. Phys. 127, 817 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Krieger.

Additional information

Support by the Swiss National Science foundation for the first author is acknowledged.

Support of the National Science Foundation DMS-0617854, DMS-1160817 for the third author is gratefully acknowledged.

Appendices

Appendix A: Concentration blowup in the interior of blowup region

Here we observe that type-II blow-up is not always on the dynamical boundary between the scattering to \(0\) and blow-up. More precisely, we have

Proposition 6.1

Let \(0<T<\infty \), \(\vec {u}^0\in \mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{olution }}([0,T))\cap L^\infty ([0,T);\mathcal {H})\). Then for any \(\delta >0\), there is \(\vec {u}^1\in \mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{olution }}([0,T))\) with the following property: \(\vec {u}^1(t)-\vec {u}^0(t)\) has a strong limit as \(t\nearrow T\), and for any \(t\in [0,T)\) and any \(\psi \in \mathcal {H}\) with \(\Vert \psi \Vert _\mathcal {H}<\delta \), the solution starting from \(\vec {u}^1(t)+\psi \) blows up in positive finite time.

In other words, for any blow-up with bounded energy norm, there is another solution with the same blow-up profile, whose orbit is in the interior of the blow-up set of initial data, with arbitrarily large distance from the exterior.

Proof

Fix \(R \ge 1+T\) such that \(\Vert \vec {u}^0(0)\Vert _{\mathcal {H}(|x|>R)} \ll 1\). Let \(u^2\) be the solution for the initial data \(\vec {u}^2(0)=\Gamma (x/R)\vec {u}^0(0)\), where \(\Gamma \) is a smooth radial function on \(\mathbb {R}^d\) satisfying \(\Gamma (x)=1\) for \(|x|\le 3\) and \(\Gamma (x)=0\) for \(|x|\ge 4\). Then the finite speed of propagation implies that for \(0<t<T\) and as long as \(u^2\) exists,

  1. (1)

    \(\vec {u}^2(t)=\vec {u}^0(t)\) on \(|x|<3R-t\),

  2. (2)

    \(\Vert \vec {u}^2(t)\Vert _{\mathcal {H}(|x|>R+t)}\ll 1\),

  3. (3)

    \(\mathrm{supp }\vec {u}^2(t)\subset \{|x|<4R+t\}\).

Since the regions for (1) and for (2) cover \([0,T)\times \mathbb {R}^d\), we deduce that \(u^2\) extends beyond \(t<T\). Moreover, both \(u^0\) and \(u^2\) extend to \(|x|>R+t\) for all \(t>0\) by the smallness in the exterior cone. Hence \(\vec {u}^2(t)-\vec {u}^0(t)\) has a strong limit in \(\mathcal {H}\) as \(t\nearrow T\).

Now fix \(\delta >0\). Since \(u^2\) is bounded in \(\mathcal {H}\) for \(0<t<T\),

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} M:=\sup \{E_{|x|<5R}(\vec {u}^2(t)+\psi )\mid t\in [0,T),\ \Vert \psi \Vert _\mathcal {H}<\delta \} \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$
(7.1)

is finite. Then we can find a strong radial solution \(u^3\) such that

  1. (1)

    \(\mathrm{supp }\vec {u}^3(t)\subset \{|x|>6R-t\}\).

  2. (2)

    \(\sup \{E_{|x|>5R}(\vec {u}^3(t)+\psi )\mid t\in [0,T),\ \Vert \psi \Vert _\mathcal {H}<\delta \}<-M-1\).

Indeed, it is easy to satisfy (1) and (2) at \(t=0\) by using a very flat radial smooth function, since for any \(\varphi ,\psi \in \mathcal {H}\) and any \(0<\varepsilon \ll 1\),

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} E_{|x|>5R}(\varphi +\psi ) \le (1+\varepsilon )E_{|x|>5R}(\varphi )+C_\varepsilon (\Vert \psi \Vert _\mathcal {H}^2+\Vert \psi _1\Vert _{2^*}^{2^*}). \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$
(7.2)

(1) is preserved for \(t>0\) by the finite speed of propagation. For such initial data, the solution may blow up in finite time, but we can delay the blow-up time as much as we like by the rescaling \(\vec S^\sigma \) with \(\sigma \rightarrow -\infty \), which makes both (1) and (2) easier. This yields \(u^3\in \mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{olution }}([0,2T])\) with the above properties.

Now let \(u^1\) be the strong solution for the initial data

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \vec {u}^1(0)=\vec {u}^2(0)+\vec {u}^3(0). \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$
(7.3)

Then the finite propagation property together with the disjoint supports of \(u^2\) and \(u^3\) implies that \(\vec {u}^1=\vec {u}^2\) for \(|x|<6R-t\), \(\vec {u}^1=\vec {u}^3\) for \(|x|>4R+t\), so \(\vec {u}^1=\vec {u}^2+\vec {u}^3\) for \(0<t<T\), and \(\vec {u}^1(t)-\vec {u}^0(t)\) has a strong limit in \(\mathcal {H}\) as \(t\nearrow T\). Moreover, for any \(t\in [0,T)\) and any \(\psi \in \mathcal {H}\) satisfying \(\Vert \psi \Vert <\delta \) we have

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} E(\vec {u}^1(t)+\psi ) =E_{|x|<5R}(\vec {u}^2(t)+\psi ) + E_{|x|>5R}(\vec {u}^3(t)+\psi )<-1, \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$
(7.4)

hence the solution starting from \(\vec {u}^1(t)+\psi \) has to blow up in finite time because of the negative energy, see [11, 18]. \(\square \)

Appendix B: Table of notation

\({\triangleleft X^\triangleright }\)

\(=X^1-X^0\)

(2.12)

\(\vec {u}\)

\(=(u,\dot{u})\) vector in the phase space

(1.2)

\(\varphi ^\dagger \)

\(=(\varphi _1,-\varphi _2)\) time inversion

(1.17)

\({\langle \cdot |\cdot \rangle }\)

\(L^2\) inner product

(1.36)

\(\fancyscript{B}_d\)

Borel sets in \(\mathbb {R}^d\)

 

(CW)

The critical wave equation

(1.1)

\(\mathcal {H}\), \(\mathcal {H}_\perp \)

Energy space, its subspace

(1.2),(1.35)

\(\mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{olution }}(I)\)

Solutions of (CW) on \(I\)

(1.27)

\(E(\vec {u}),P(\vec {u})\)

Total energy and momentum

(1.4),(1.5)

\(E_B(\varphi ),K_B(\varphi )\)

Restricted energy functionals

(3.15)

\(U(t)\)

Free propagator

(1.12)

\(\mathcal {T}^c,\mathcal {S}^\sigma ,S_a^\sigma \)

Invariant translation and scaling

(1.28)

\({\mathrm{St }},{\mathrm{St }}_*^*,q_s,q_m\)

Strichartz norms and exponents

(1.22)

\(W\), \(\mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{tatic }}(W)\)

Ground states

(1.8),(1.9)

\(\mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{oliton }}(W)\)

Ground solitons

(1.10)

\(\mathrm{dist }_W\), \(d_W\)

Distances to the ground states

(1.16),(1.59)

\(L_+\), \(\mathcal {L}\)

Linearized operators around \(W\)

(1.30),(1.32)

\(N(v),\underline{N}(v)\)

Higher order terms

(1.31),(1.54)

\(\rho \), \(k\), \(P_\perp \)

Ground state of \(L_+\)

(1.34)

\(g_\pm \), \(\Lambda _\pm \)

(un)stable modes of \(J\mathcal {L}\)

(1.39),(1.40)

\(v,\lambda ,\gamma ,\lambda _\pm \)

Components of \(u\) around \(W\)

(1.38),(1.39)

\((\alpha ,\mu )\)

Parameters to define the orthogonality

(1.42)

\((\widetilde{\sigma },\widetilde{c})\), \(\fancyscript{T}_\varphi \), \(\widetilde{\lambda }\)

Local coordinates by the orthogonality

(1.52), Lemma 1.4

\(Z=(Z_1,Z_2)\)

Modulation operator in the equation

(1.54)

\(\tau \)

Rescaled time variable

(1.53)

\(\Vert \varphi \Vert _E\), \(\nu (\tau )\)

Linearized energy norms

(1.43),(2.42)

\(\mathcal {B}_\delta \), \(\mathcal {B}_\delta ^+\), \(\mathcal {B}_\delta '\)

Small balls for different components

(1.45), (2.1)

\(\mathcal {N}_\delta \), \(\mathcal {N}_{\delta _1,\delta _2}\)

Neighborhoods of \(\mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{tatic }}(W)\)

(1.45),(2.2)

\(\Phi _{\sigma ,c}\), \(\Psi _{\sigma ,c}\)

Local coordinates around \(\mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{tatic }}(W)\)

(1.44)

\(\mathcal {M}_0\sim \mathcal {M}_5\)

Local manifold and its extensions

(2.8),(3.1),(3.33),(5.1)

\(m_+,M_+\)

Functions defining the local manifold

Theorem 2.1,(2.11)

\(a_W,b_W\)

Positive constants

(1.48),(1.49)

\(\varepsilon _S\)

Small Strichartz norm for scattering

(1.24)

\(\delta _\Phi \), \(\delta _m\)

Small distances from \(\mathrm{S }_{\mathrm{tatic }}(W)\)

Lemma 1.4, Theorem 2.1

\(\iota _I\)

Smallness in the ignition lemma

Lemma 2.2

\(\eta _l\)

\(\tau \)-length for uniform Strichartz bound

Lemma 2.3

\(\varsigma _m,\varsigma _*\)

Smallness in radiative distance

(5.1), Theorems 6.3,6.5

\(\varepsilon _*,\delta _*\)

Smallness in the one-pass theorem

[14, Theorem 5.1]

\(\kappa (\delta )\)

Variational bound on \(K\)

[14, Lemma 4.1]

\(B_{+a},B_{-a}\)

Fattened and thinned sets by radius \(a\)

(3.3),(3.5)

\({\mathcal {H}\!\downharpoonright \!B},\widetilde{\mathcal {H}}(B)\)

Restrictions of \(\mathcal {H}\) to \(B\)

(3.7),(3.10)

\(X_B\)

Extension operator from \(B\) to \(\mathbb {R}^d\)

(3.14)

\(\fancyscript{D}(u)\), \(t_\pm (\varphi ,x)\)

Maximal space-time domain of solution

(3.26)

\(\fancyscript{R}_B^T\)

Seminorm measuring radiation

(4.1)

\(u^{\mathrm{\mathbf d }}\),\(u^{\mathrm{\mathbf x }}\)

Detached interior and exterior solutions

Lemma 4.4

\(d_{\fancyscript{R}}(\varphi )\)

Radiative distance to the ground states

(6.1)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krieger, J., Nakanishi, K. & Schlag, W. Center-stable manifold of the ground state in the energy space for the critical wave equation. Math. Ann. 361, 1–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-014-1059-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-014-1059-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation