Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strictly nef divisors

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boucksom, S., Demailly, J.P., Paun, M., Peternell, Th.: The pseudo-effective cone of a compact Kähler manifold and varieties of negative Kodaira dimension. math.AG/0405285

  2. Hacon C.: A derived category approach to generic vanishing. J. Reine Angew. Math. 575, 173–187 (2004)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartshorne R.: Ample subvarieties of algebraic varieties. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 156. Springer, Heidelberg (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hartshorne R.: Algebraic geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52. Springer, Heidelberg (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kollár J.: Shafarevich maps and automorphic forms. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kollár, J.: Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds. Astérisque 211, (1992)

  7. Kollár J., Mori S.: Birational geometry of algebraic varieties. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 134. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawamata Y., Matsuki K., Matsuda K.: Introduction to the minimal model program. Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 10, 283–360 (1987)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuki K.: A criterion for the canonical bundle of a 3-fold to be ample. Math. Ann. 276, 557–564 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mori S.: Threefolds whose anticanonical bundles are not numerically effective. Ann Math. 116, 133–176 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyanishi M.: Algebraic threefolds. Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 1, 69–99 (1983)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukai S.: Duality between D(X) and \({D(\hat {X})}\) with application to Picard sheaves. Nagoya Math. J. 81, 153–175 (1981)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Peternell T.: Algebraicity criteria for compact complex manifolds. Math. Ann. 275, 653–672 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Serrano F.: Strictly nef divisors and Fano threefolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. 464, 187–206 (1995)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Uehara H.: On the canonical threefolds with strictly nef anticanonical divisors. J. Reine Angew. Math. 522, 81–91 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département de Mathématiques, Université de Nancy, 54506, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France

    Frédéric Campana

  2. Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan

    Jungkai A. Chen

  3. Taida Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei Office, Taipei, Taiwan

    Jungkai A. Chen

  4. Mathematisches Institut, Universität Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany

    Thomas Peternell

Authors
  1. Frédéric Campana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jungkai A. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Peternell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Peternell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campana, F., Chen, J.A. & Peternell, T. Strictly nef divisors. Math. Ann. 342, 565–585 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-008-0248-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-008-0248-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation